National Sun Yat-sen University - NSYSU vs TIAS School for Business and Society vs Escuela Superior de Cine y Audiovisuales de Cataluña - ESCAC vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs University of Opole

Side-by-side comparison from 27 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
National Sun Yat-sen University - NSYSU: wins 0/5 categories
TIAS School for Business and Society: wins 3/5 categories
Escuela Superior de Cine y Audiovisuales de Cataluña - ESCAC: wins 0/5 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 0/5 categories
University of Opole: wins 0/5 categories
Mohammed VI Polytechnic University - UM6P: wins 0/5 categories
College of Health Technology - COHTECH: wins 2/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Foreign Languages and Literature
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Film Studies
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Best programme: Intercultural Communication
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Best programme: Community Health
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.50
4.40
4.33
4.67
4.00
Location
Not rated
5.00
4.50
4.70
4.00
3.78
5.00
Professors
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
4.60
4.00
4.33
4.00
Internationality
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
4.60
3.33
4.56
4.00
Student life
Not rated
2.00
4.50
3.90
4.00
4.33
5.00
Win
Value
Not rated
5.00
3.50
3.90
4.67
4.56
5.00
Accommodation
Not rated
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.67
4.56
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive environment for language and cultural immersion
  • +Accessible international programs taught in English
  • +Democratic atmosphere for cultural exploration
  • +Personal assistance and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Engaging professors and insightful discussions
  • +Engaging and passionate faculty and visiting lecturers
  • +Electric energy and inspiring community
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Practical application of studies
  • +Welcoming community and inclusive environment
  • +High quality education and professors
  • +Excellent campus environment and facilities
  • +Global partnerships and industry connections
  • +Engaging learning activities, positive environment, and excellent lectures.
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Lack of student support and resources.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Overcrowded and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Ineffective communication and bureaucratic administrative processes.
  • -Lack of engaging and up-to-date curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hindered learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency led to disappointment.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders academic success.
  • -Ineffective and outdated teaching methods are a recurring concern.
  • -The institution suffers from poor administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this university received consistently low ratings across all surveyed aspects, with no areas standing out as particularly strong or weak. Scores of zero were recorded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This suggests significant room for improvement in every facet of the university experience.

Across the surveyed categories, this institution excels in its **facilities, professors, location, internationality, and perceived value**, all receiving perfect scores. In contrast, areas for development appear to be **student life and accommodation**, with significantly lower ratings in these aspects.

Across various aspects, this university demonstrates notable strengths in **professors, location, student life, and internationality**, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as a weaker area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Facilities and overall value received moderate ratings of 3.5.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

This institution receives top marks for its **Facilities** and **Value**, with both scoring exceptionally high. **Student Life**, **Location**, and **Professors** are also rated positively. Areas with room for improvement include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**, which received lower scores compared to other aspects. Overall, it presents a strong offering, particularly in its resources and perceived worth.

This university achieves a strong overall rating, with particularly high marks for its **Facilities** (4.67) and excellent scores in **Student Life** (4.33), **Accomodation** (4.56), **Internationality** (4.56), and **Value** (4.56). **Professors** also received a commendable rating (4.33). The **Location** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect at 3.78.

This university garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in its Location, Student Life, Accomodation, and Value, all receiving a perfect score. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated at 4. Internationality is similarly strong with a score of 4. The weakest area, though still a strong score, is Facilities at 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, the feedback highlights a great environment for learning Chinese, including native speakers and cultural exploration. Programs taught in English are also a positive aspect for international students.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This suggests a highly positive experience, with feedback praising personal assistance and engaging professors. No negative feedback was reported.

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~99%). Reviews highlight engaging teachers and an electric atmosphere. No negative reviews were received.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

With an average rating of 4.33/5 and 100% positive feedback, students highlight supportive lecturers and opportunities to pursue passions. The curriculum is praised for its comprehensiveness, with early clinical contact being an advantage for medical students.

With an average rating of 4.56/5 from 9 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~89%). Students praise the high quality of education, strong academic programs, excellent campus facilities, and valuable global partnerships. No negative feedback was reported.

With one review received, the university earns a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review was positive, highlighting great learning activities, environment, and lectures.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
100%
50%
60%
33%
67%
100%
4★
100%
0%
0%
40%
67%
22%
0%
3★
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
11%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close