Eskisehir Osmangazi University vs University of Kentucky vs Queensland University of Technology vs Loyola Marymount University - LMU vs Comenius University in Bratislava

Side-by-side comparison from 62 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava - STU (5.00)
Eskisehir Osmangazi University: wins 0/6 categories
University of Kentucky: wins 1/6 categories
Queensland University of Technology: wins 1/6 categories
Loyola Marymount University - LMU: wins 0/6 categories
Comenius University in Bratislava: wins 0/6 categories
Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava - STU: wins 4/6 categories
University of Economics in Bratislava: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Nanotechnology
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
4.40
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of International Studies
Best programme: International Business
Los Angeles, California, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Biology
Best programme: Chemical Technology
Best programme: Business Administration and Management
Category ratings
Facilities
2.85
4.75
Win
4.54
4.45
4.17
4.00
3.00
Location
5.00
4.40
4.62
4.47
4.46
5.00
4.50
Professors
3.50
4.40
4.62
Win
4.38
4.16
3.00
3.50
Internationality
4.05
4.80
4.38
4.14
4.12
5.00
Win
2.00
Student life
3.50
4.80
4.00
4.38
4.05
5.00
Win
3.50
Value
2.30
4.60
4.46
4.33
4.12
5.00
Win
3.00
Accommodation
3.75
4.60
3.67
4.10
3.52
5.00
Win
2.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Welcoming and open-minded city and people
  • +Hospitable university staff and teachers
  • +Focus on personal development and character building
  • +Welcoming community & diverse programs
  • +Helpful professors & good facilities
  • +Career opportunities & campus involvement
  • +Supportive environment and accessible, expert faculty.
  • +Real-world relevant assignments and hands-on learning.
  • +Welcoming campus and diverse opportunities for growth.
  • +Welcoming community and supportive professors
  • +Beautiful and engaging campus environment
  • +Smooth transition and strong academic experience
  • +Knowledgeable, approachable, and supportive professors
  • +Well-organized online platform and fair grading system
  • +Wide range of study programs and career options
  • +Comprehensive preparation for life's challenges
  • +Ample opportunities for study and practical work experience
  • +Widely accepted European degree providing sufficient living standards
  • +Wide program selection in the capital.
  • +Progressive teaching methods used by some instructors.
  • +Business Management program valued for practical usefulness.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant and poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinder academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication create frustration.
  • -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinder academic progress.
  • -Unengaging lectures and outdated course material are problematic.
  • -Limited hands-on experience hinders practical learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring frustration.
  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -Many students are unhappy with the outdated facilities and lack of resources.
  • -There are recurring complaints about poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff.
  • -Unengaging and outdated academic content.
  • -Lack of practical application and international opportunities.
Rating summary
What students say

This university excels in **Location**, scoring a perfect 5.0. It also demonstrates considerable strengths in **Internationality** (4.05) and **Accomodation** (3.75), with positive feedback for **Professors** and **Student Life** (both 3.5). However, **Facilities** (2.85) and particularly **Value** (2.3) represent its weakest areas, indicating potential room for improvement in these aspects.

Overall, this institution garners very positive feedback from students. It shines brightest in Student Life and Internationality, both scoring an impressive 4.8. Facilities also receive excellent marks at 4.75. The area with the comparatively lowest rating is Professors, though still strong at 4.4.

This institution demonstrates excellent performance in several key areas. Professors and location received exceptionally high scores, closely followed by facilities and value. Student life and internationality also scored well. However, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, receiving a notably lower rating compared to other aspects.

This university receives strong marks across most categories. Its location stands out as the highest-rated aspect, followed closely by facilities. Student life and professors also garnered positive feedback. Accommodations represent the lowest-rated area, with internationality and value falling somewhere in between. The university demonstrates a solid overall performance with particular strengths in its surroundings and infrastructure.

This university demonstrates a strong showing across most aspects of student experience. Its highest-rated category is Location, followed closely by Professors, Facilities, Internationality, and Value. Student Life also received positive marks. The area receiving the lowest score is Accomodation, indicating room for improvement in that specific domain.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its **location**, **student life**, **accommodation**, **internationality**, and overall **value**. These aspects are clearly areas of significant investment and positive student experience. Conversely, the **professors** received a comparatively lower rating of 3, suggesting this might be an area for potential improvement when contrasted with its other highly-rated features. The **facilities** also scored well at 4.

Performance is particularly strong in location, receiving a high rating. Conversely, accommodation and internationality represent areas needing significant improvement, indicated by lower scores. Overall, the university presents a mixed profile with average ratings in facilities, professors, student life, and value.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~67% of feedback being positive, students highlight the welcoming and respectful nature of the city and its people, noting the university as a place for personal growth and a good experience for foreigners.

With a 4.4/5 average rating from five reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent facilities, professors, and diverse opportunities, while a small portion notes occasional administrative issues.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, averaging 4.54/5 from 13 feedback entries. Students highlight supportive faculties, practical/real-world assignments, and convenient campus locations with modern facilities. No negative feedback was reported.

With an average rating of 4.48/5 from 21 reviews, ~90% highlight positive experiences. Students praise the stunning campus, strong community, and supportive professors, noting a smooth transition and enjoyable academic environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

Most university student reviews are positive (~76%), praising easy-to-use online platforms, knowledgeable and approachable professors, and a wide range of study options. A small percentage (~6%) express minor disappointments with specific programs.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This feedback is entirely positive, recommending the university for its comprehensive preparation for life's challenges and broad educational opportunities.

Reviews are split, with a 3/5 average rating. Approximately 50% of feedback is negative, highlighting a need for modernized teaching and more practical, international projects. Positive comments mention the capital location and program variety.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
40%
54%
57%
41%
100%
0%
4★
67%
60%
46%
33%
35%
0%
50%
3★
33%
0%
0%
10%
18%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
50%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Mixed feelings

Comenius University in Bratislava has its strengths, but the biological chemistry program has been somewhat disappointing. While the university is well-regarded, the lectures often lack energy, and I feel the course material could be more engaging and up-to-date. Hands-on experience is limited, which makes it hard to stay motivated. That said, the university does offer a solid foundation, and the faculty is knowledgeable, so with some effort, you can still gain a lot. However, for anyone looking for a more interactive and stimulating program, it might be worth exploring other options.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close