İzmir Institute of Technology - IZTECH vs Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University vs Odessa National Polytechnic University - ONPU vs Odesa State Economic University vs Indonesian State College of Meteorology Climatology and Geophysics - STMKG

Side-by-side comparison from 9 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: İzmir Institute of Technology - IZTECH (4.60)
İzmir Institute of Technology - IZTECH: wins 1/2 categories
Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University: wins 0/2 categories
Odessa National Polytechnic University - ONPU: wins 0/2 categories
Odesa State Economic University: wins 0/2 categories
Indonesian State College of Meteorology Climatology and Geophysics - STMKG: wins 0/2 categories
Providence University: wins 0/2 categories
University of Wyoming - UW: wins 1/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics
Taichung, Taiwan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Laramie, Wyoming, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Studies
Category ratings
Facilities
4.67
Win
2.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.67
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.67
2.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.00
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Student life
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.00
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
2.33
2.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Experienced professors and high-quality technical programs
  • +Strong research facilities and technology-focused environment
  • +Opportunities for international students and industry connections
  • +Foundational science education
  • +Excellent teaching and materials
  • +Desire for modern teaching methods and staff

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
  • +Flexible and responsive teaching approach
  • +(No other recurring positive themes beyond professor-related ones in the provided text)
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Outdated curriculum and lack of willingness to improve it are major concerns.
  • -Poor communication and disorganization from the university administration are frequent issues.
  • -Facilities are often described as very old and in poor condition.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently problematic.
  • -Insufficient communication and administrative issues cause significant frustration.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as outdated and lacking in practical relevance.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines in its **facilities** and **professors**, both receiving exceptional scores. Its **value** is also rated highly. Conversely, **accommodation** emerges as a significant area for improvement, with the lowest score. **Student life** and **internationality** are rated moderately, while **location** falls somewhere in between.

The university shows a mixed performance, excelling in location and value, both receiving 3.67. Student life is rated a solid 3. In contrast, internationality is the lowest-rated area at 2, with facilities and accommodation also scoring a low 2.33. Professors are rated moderately at 2.67.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution exhibits a highly uneven rating profile. The standout area is undoubtedly the quality of professors, which received a perfect score. Conversely, facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all garnered zero ratings, indicating significant shortcomings in these aspects. Internationality and value for money are moderately positive, scoring a 3 and a 4 respectively, suggesting these are areas of relative strength compared to the weakest categories.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 5 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.6/5. Students highlight experienced professors, state-of-the-art labs, English instruction, and entrepreneurial opportunities.

With a 2.67 average rating, roughly 33% of reviews are negative, citing outdated curriculum and teaching methods. One positive review highlights excellent fundamental science education but notes a lack of modern teaching approaches.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This university receives strong positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being positive. Students praise knowledgeable and accommodating professors. A minor point of improvement mentioned relates to administrative rigidity.

Rating distribution
5★
60%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
40%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
The future of Engineering

IZTECH has everything a student would need to brighten his/her future. For example. in the computer engineering department, professors are so experienced and good at teaching that, wow. It is just awesome.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close