Universidad Tecnológica Privada de Santa Cruz De La Sierra - UTEPSA vs Universidad Autónoma Gabriel René Moreno - UAGRM vs Transylvania University vs Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano - ITM vs Universidad Privada de Santa Cruz de la Sierra - UPSA
Side-by-side comparison from 21 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible modular system for work-life balance
- +Focus on individual subject progression over semester loads
- +Accessible education, affordability, and respected degree programs
- +Engaged professors and a supportive learning environment
- +Vibrant campus life and diverse student community
- +Engaging academics and supportive faculty
- +Strong sense of community and extracurricular opportunities
- +Small class sizes and personalized attention
Nothing to show
- +Experienced, industry-connected teachers and practical, hands-on learning
- +Opportunities for international study and valuable networking
- +Encouragement of entrepreneurship and business development
- +Historic building and excellent transportation access
- +Convenient downtown location for breaks and socializing
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated or poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often perceived as lacking or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum that is not relevant to current industry needs are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative & management issues.
- -Outdated facilities.
- -Poor career services.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Course content or delivery is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly executed.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Lack of necessary resources and outdated curriculum hinder learning.
Nothing to show
Outstanding ratings were awarded for its location, achieving a perfect score. Facilities also received a high mark of 4. Conversely, the university received very low scores for accommodation and internationality. Professors, student life, and value were rated moderately at 3.
Rankings reveal a university excelling in several key areas. Its strongest performing categories are Location and Value, both scoring exceptionally high. Student Life and Professors also received very positive feedback. Conversely, Accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Facilities and Internationality fall in the mid-range.
Academic strengths are evident, with professors receiving a commendable 4.5 rating. The university also fares well in location (4) and value (3.75). Areas for improvement include accommodation, rated at a low 2.5, and facilities and student life, both scoring a moderate 3. Internationality is rated at 3.25.
Nothing to show
Overall, this university receives positive feedback. Student life stands out as its strongest aspect, with a rating of 4.6. Facilities, professors, and value are also highly regarded, all scoring 4.14. Location and accommodation received a solid rating of 4, while internationality scored 4.29. The university demonstrates a well-rounded offering with particular strengths in student engagement and academic quality.
This institution garners exceptional scores for its **facilities** and **location**, both receiving perfect marks. **Student life** also shines with a top rating. Conversely, **accommodation** presents a significant area for improvement, scoring a low 2 out of 5. Other aspects like **professors**, **internationality**, and overall **value** are rated positively, indicating a generally well-rounded experience despite the noted housing challenges.
Nothing to show
The single review is overwhelmingly positive (100%), highlighting a flexible modular modality that suits student life and work. The average rating is 5/5.
With an average rating of 4.38/5, about 88% of reviews are positive, praising excellent academic atmosphere, qualified professors, and good infrastructure. A small percentage of feedback noted potential improvements needed in some program facilities and equipment.
Approximately 75% of reviews are positive, highlighting engaging academics, supportive professors, and a strong sense of community with great extracurriculars. A small portion of feedback expressed some concerns.
Nothing to show
With a 4.29/5 average, ~86% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent teachers, practical learning, and networking opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~14%) suggests a need for campus renovations and equipment updates.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. Recurring themes highlight the historic and elegant building, convenient downtown location with excellent public transport access, and enjoyable social opportunities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I consider UPSA as the first option for many people to carry out their studies for the simple fact of being the best university in the city. A UPSA professional has many privileges, as an institution motivates its students to be the best. As well as good things, it also has its drawbacks; the fact that it is a private university, its cost is very high and each year it tends to continue to rise. On the other hand, in my opinion, I believe that being the number one university, it should have more special offers for its students, such as being a student residence or dorms, and it could also have special transport for students since its location is not very central.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show