Universidad Tecnológica Privada de Santa Cruz De La Sierra - UTEPSA vs Universidad Autónoma Gabriel René Moreno - UAGRM vs Excelia Business School vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS vs Universidad Privada de Santa Cruz de la Sierra - UPSA
Side-by-side comparison from 42 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible modular system for work-life balance
- +Focus on individual subject progression over semester loads
- +Accessible education, affordability, and respected degree programs
- +Engaged professors and a supportive learning environment
- +Vibrant campus life and diverse student community
- +Supportive professors and practical, relevant coursework
- +Strong international environment and diverse student community
- +Numerous opportunities for personal growth and engagement
Nothing to show
- +Experienced, industry-connected teachers and practical, hands-on learning
- +Opportunities for international study and valuable networking
- +Encouragement of entrepreneurship and business development
- +Supportive faculty and individual attention
- +Diverse and engaging student body
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated or poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often perceived as lacking or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum that is not relevant to current industry needs are frequently criticized.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication from staff and administration.
- -Lack of adequate support and resources.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Course content or delivery is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly executed.
- -Poor course structure and confusing administration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources.
- -Limited career support and unclear future prospects.
Nothing to show
Outstanding ratings were awarded for its location, achieving a perfect score. Facilities also received a high mark of 4. Conversely, the university received very low scores for accommodation and internationality. Professors, student life, and value were rated moderately at 3.
Rankings reveal a university excelling in several key areas. Its strongest performing categories are Location and Value, both scoring exceptionally high. Student Life and Professors also received very positive feedback. Conversely, Accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Facilities and Internationality fall in the mid-range.
The university demonstrates exceptional strength in **Internationality**, achieving a score of 4.6. Student Life also garners high marks, rating at 4.37. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.8. Other areas, including Facilities, Professors, Location, and Value, all receive positive ratings, generally falling between 4.1 and 4.3.
Nothing to show
Overall, this university receives positive feedback. Student life stands out as its strongest aspect, with a rating of 4.6. Facilities, professors, and value are also highly regarded, all scoring 4.14. Location and accommodation received a solid rating of 4, while internationality scored 4.29. The university demonstrates a well-rounded offering with particular strengths in student engagement and academic quality.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks in several key areas, notably Professors, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, all scoring a perfect 5. Facilities are rated well at 4. The weakest area, according to these ratings, is Location, with a score of 3. Overall, the university presents a very strong offering with minimal drawbacks.
Nothing to show
The single review is overwhelmingly positive (100%), highlighting a flexible modular modality that suits student life and work. The average rating is 5/5.
With an average rating of 4.38/5, about 88% of reviews are positive, praising excellent academic atmosphere, qualified professors, and good infrastructure. A small percentage of feedback noted potential improvements needed in some program facilities and equipment.
With a 4.36 average rating from 25 reviews, ~100% are positive. Students highlight engaging courses, supportive teachers, and a strong international environment. Some administrative processes could be improved.
Nothing to show
With a 4.29/5 average, ~86% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent teachers, practical learning, and networking opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~14%) suggests a need for campus renovations and equipment updates.
With an average rating of 4/5, positive feedback (~100%) highlights supportive faculty and a diverse student body. There is no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I consider UPSA as the first option for many people to carry out their studies for the simple fact of being the best university in the city. A UPSA professional has many privileges, as an institution motivates its students to be the best. As well as good things, it also has its drawbacks; the fact that it is a private university, its cost is very high and each year it tends to continue to rise. On the other hand, in my opinion, I believe that being the number one university, it should have more special offers for its students, such as being a student residence or dorms, and it could also have special transport for students since its location is not very central.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
