Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla - BUAP vs TU Dresden vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs Noroff School of Technology and Digital Media vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics
Side-by-side comparison from 34 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Qualified and encouraging professors
- +Positive and collaborative student atmosphere
- +Excellent academic programs and international opportunities
- +Excellent academic programs and intellectual challenge
- +Strong practical application and hands-on learning
- +Supportive environment and vibrant campus life
- +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
- +Practical approach and industry connections
- +Good location and food variety
Nothing to show
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
- +Welcoming international environment and modern facilities
- +Excellent research opportunities and advanced tools
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +strong technical and practical focus on systems
- +sustainability and real-world application
- +analytical thinking and problem-solving
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Overloaded modules and excessive study hours detract from learning time.
- -Poor translation of lecture materials hinders understanding.
- -Inconsistent teaching with multiple professors per module creates confusion.
- -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
- -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
- -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently criticized.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often found to be subpar.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unresponsive staff are common complaints.
This university receives strong commendations for its **Location**, earning a near-perfect score. **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality** also score well, indicating a positive overall experience. The **Value** proposition is also highly regarded. The most significant area for improvement appears to be **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.
Considering various aspects of the university experience, the location stands out with an exceptional rating. Facilities and value also received high marks, indicating strengths in these areas. Student life and accommodation were rated similarly positive. While professors and internationality were rated slightly lower, they still represent solid performance. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded profile with particular excellence in its surroundings and practical resources.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.
Nothing to show
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
This institution garners high marks across most aspects, with outstanding facilities rated a perfect 5. Professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all receive a solid 4. The strongest area is clearly its facilities, while the other evaluated categories demonstrate a consistently strong, though less exceptional, performance.
This institution receives strong marks in several key areas. Its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at 4 out of 5. While professors and internationality are rated a respectable 3, these represent the weakest aspects of the university's profile. Overall, the university offers good value for students.
University reviews are highly positive (9 out of 11 reviews), with an average rating of 4.36/5. Students highlight qualified and encouraging professors, a fantastic atmosphere with driven peers, and excellent academic programs. Opportunities for scholarships and international exchanges are also noted.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 12 reviews, ~75% are positive, highlighting excellent programs, engaging learning, and good facilities. A small ~8% of feedback was negative, citing demanding workloads and translation issues.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.
Nothing to show
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
With one review, the average rating is 4 out of 5 stars, indicating a positive experience. The feedback highlights a welcoming international environment, modern facilities, and opportunities for research skill development.
The program is highly rated at 4/5 stars, with ~100% positive feedback. Students appreciate the focus on modern society's power infrastructure and systems. The curriculum emphasizes technical skills, analytical thinking, and practical problem-solving, particularly in sustainability.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
