University of Redlands - UofR vs Sumy State University vs Tallinn University of Applied Sciences vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM vs Tamale Technical University - TATU

Side-by-side comparison from 31 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM (4.70)
University of Redlands - UofR: wins 0/6 categories
Sumy State University: wins 0/6 categories
Tallinn University of Applied Sciences: wins 1/6 categories
MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM: wins 5/6 categories
Tamale Technical University - TATU: wins 0/6 categories
Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology: wins 0/6 categories
Asia Pacific Institute of Management - APIM: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Redlands, California, United States
3.90
Read more reviews
8 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: Facilities Management
Best programme: MBA
Best programme: Bsc Information Technology
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.13
3.25
4.25
5.00
Win
3.00
4.00
3.00
Location
4.13
3.75
4.50
4.50
4.00
3.57
4.00
Professors
4.38
3.25
4.75
Win
4.33
4.50
4.29
3.00
Internationality
4.25
3.25
3.75
4.67
Win
4.00
3.14
3.00
Student life
4.13
3.50
4.50
4.67
Win
3.00
4.14
2.00
Value
3.75
2.75
4.00
4.67
Win
4.50
3.86
3.00
Accommodation
3.75
2.50
3.00
4.67
Win
3.00
3.43
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent professors and engaging programs
  • +Beautiful campus and vibrant student life
  • +Commitment to sustainability and social justice
  • +Understanding and supportive teachers
  • +Strong academic programs and knowledge acquisition
  • +Positive campus environment and affordability
  • +High-quality education with practical skills focus
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment with good remote options and activities
  • +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
  • +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
  • +Real-world application and career preparation
  • +Skill acquisition for career and future
  • +Project support from lecturers
  • +Desire for degree-level programs
  • +Excellent and supportive faculty
  • +Vibrant campus life and activities
  • +Strong technical education and infrastructure

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frequent disruptions.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -The curriculum lacks relevance and is poorly delivered.
  • -Insufficient practical training and overwhelming theory.
  • -Irrelevant or excessive coursework, including unnecessary national language and history.
  • -Poor communication, administrative issues, and perceived financial exploitation.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The teaching quality and curriculum are often criticized for being uninspiring or irrelevant.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Limited career support and unclear future prospects are disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent or unclear communication from instructors and staff.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Professors**, which received the highest rating. **Internationality** is also a well-regarded aspect. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Value** are areas where the university scores lower compared to other metrics. Ratings for Facilities, Location, and Student Life fall within a similar, mid-range bracket.

Considering a university's strengths and weaknesses, location stands out as a particularly strong aspect, receiving a high rating. Conversely, accommodation appears to be the weakest area, with a significantly lower score. Other aspects such as facilities, professors, student life, and internationality fall within a moderate range, indicating a balanced performance across these categories.

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its academic offerings and student experience. Professors receive a near-perfect score of 4.75, with facilities, location, and student life also scoring highly at 4.25 and 4.5 respectively. The primary area for improvement lies in accommodation, which received a lower rating of 3. Internationality also presents an opportunity for growth at 3.75, while the overall value is rated a solid 4.

This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.

Academic excellence and international appeal are clear strengths, evidenced by high ratings for professors (4.5) and internationality (4). The university also scores well in location (4) and value (4.5). However, areas such as facilities, student life, and accommodation received more moderate scores of 3, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects.

This institution receives positive marks across multiple facets. Its strongest areas are its Professors and Student Life, both scoring above 4. The University also fares well in Facilities and Value. Areas requiring further attention include Internationality and Accomodation, which are rated the lowest. Location also shows room for improvement.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The majority of reviews (~88%) highlight a beautiful campus, dedicated faculty, and a supportive, diverse environment with numerous academic and extracurricular opportunities. A small portion (~12%) notes limited course offerings.

~67% of reviews are positive, praising understanding teachers and good learning experiences. ~33% are negative, citing insufficient practical training and irrelevant coursework.

With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~75% of feedback is positive. Students praise high-quality education, practical skills, knowledgeable and supportive faculty, and engaging activities. No negative reviews were submitted.

Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, the 2 reviews were entirely positive. Students highlighted lectures' assistance with projects and skill acquisition for future careers.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~86% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.14/5. Students highlight good faculty and infrastructure, though one review mentioned weak placements.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
33%
50%
67%
50%
29%
0%
4★
88%
33%
25%
33%
50%
57%
0%
3★
13%
0%
25%
0%
0%
14%
100%
2★
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

75%

It's not a university but it's a training ground to acquire skills for a purpose and future. What I like about this is Lectures are always ready to assist students to undertake projects which enhance their ability. What I dislike about the school is students are being stressed with series of projects with limited time.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close