Universidad Católica Boliviana San Pablo - UCB vs Universidad del Valle - UNIVALLE vs Universidad Mayor de San Andrés - UMSA vs Universidad de Aquino de Bolivia - UDABOL vs Loyola College

Side-by-side comparison from 52 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Loyola College (4.50)
Universidad Católica Boliviana San Pablo - UCB: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad del Valle - UNIVALLE: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Mayor de San Andrés - UMSA: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de Aquino de Bolivia - UDABOL: wins 0/7 categories
Loyola College: wins 1/7 categories
Gauhati University: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad Privada Franz Tamayo - UNIFRANZ: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Chemical Engineering
Best programme: BS Industrial Engineering
Best programme: Psychological Science
Chennai, India
4.50
Top
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Guwahati, India
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Medicine and Surgery
Category ratings
Facilities
4.35
Win
Not rated
3.21
Not rated
4.00
3.67
3.00
Location
4.71
Not rated
4.54
Not rated
4.57
5.00
Win
4.00
Professors
4.00
Not rated
3.93
4.00
4.60
Win
4.33
3.00
Internationality
3.06
Not rated
3.29
3.00
4.13
3.00
5.00
Win
Student life
4.31
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
4.33
4.33
5.00
Win
Value
4.06
Not rated
4.21
3.00
4.13
4.67
Win
4.00
Accommodation
4.12
Win
Not rated
2.54
Not rated
3.47
4.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Impressive campus facilities and infrastructure
  • +Excellent teaching staff with expertise and practical knowledge
  • +Strong reputation, prestige, and professional networking opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +High academic standards and quality teaching from experienced faculty.
  • +Practical training opportunities and sought-after, competitive professionals.
  • +Multidisciplinary knowledge acquisition and relevant industry connections.
  • +Effective teaching and progress support
  • +Reliable problem resolution
  • +Versatile and specialized programs
  • +Encouraging and supportive faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and campus environment
  • +High-quality education and approachable, knowledgeable professors
  • +Practical learning, relevant curriculum, and flexible study options
  • +Supportive environment with helpful faculty and staff
  • +Good facilities and dynamic classrooms
  • +Well-equipped, quiet campus environment
  • +Entertainment and social spaces
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.

Nothing to show

  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues are a common complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources significantly hinder the learning experience.
  • -A lack of clear communication and support from staff causes dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Communication is frequently unclear or lacking.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources.
  • -Poor communication and disorganized administration.
  • -Limited career support and networking opportunities.
  • -Administrative & management issues hinder progress.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of engagement and unclear expectations from instructors are prevalent.
  • -Lack of engagement and support from instructors.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
  • -Administrative & management issues.
Rating summary
What students say

Among the surveyed aspects, the university's location stands out as its strongest attribute with a score of 4.71. Facilities also received positive marks at 4.35. Conversely, internationality emerged as the lowest-rated area, scoring 3.06. Value for money was rated at 4.06, while accommodation, student life, and professors garnered respectable scores in the low to mid-four range.

Nothing to show

An analysis of university ratings reveals a strong performance in its **Location**, which received the highest score. The **Value** of education also stands out positively. However, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, indicating room for improvement. Other aspects like **Professors**, **Student Life**, **Internationality**, and **Facilities** fall within a moderate range, suggesting a generally well-rounded institution with specific areas of excellence and concern.

Here's a summary of the university ratings:

**Performance is notably strong in the areas of professors (rated 4 out of 5) and internationality and value (both rated 3 out of 5). Conversely, the university receives zero ratings for its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, indicating significant weaknesses in these aspects.** This suggests a primary focus on academic quality and global engagement, with considerable room for improvement in the physical campus and student experience offerings.

This institution receives high marks for its professors and location, with ratings of 4.6 and approximately 4.57 respectively. Student life and internationality also score well, both around 4.13. Facilities are rated at a solid 4. The weakest area is accommodation, which scores 3.47, indicating room for improvement in this aspect.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Location** (5/5), **Value** (4.67/5), and the quality of its **Professors** and **Student Life** (both 4.33/5). Conversely, **Internationality** presents the weakest area with a rating of 3/5, followed by **Facilities** at 3.67/5. **Accomodation** also received a solid rating of 4/5.

This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly in Student Life and Internationality, both receiving a perfect score of 5. Its Location and Accommodation also stand out with strong ratings of 4. Facilities and Professors, however, received the lowest scores at 3, indicating these areas may have room for improvement. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with notable strengths in student experience and global engagement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~89% of reviews are highly positive. Students praise the university's impressive campus, great facilities, excellent teaching staff, and central location. No negative feedback was reported.

Nothing to show

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~79% of feedback being highly favorable. Students commend high academic standards, experienced faculty, and practical learning opportunities. No negative reviews were recorded.

With a 4/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students appreciate the progress and teaching, including refresher courses. One student experienced a documentation issue causing a degree delay but a solution was provided.

Students highly praise the university, with ~93% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.47/5. Recurring themes include excellent professors, varied courses, and a beautiful campus with ample facilities. Accommodation costs are noted as expensive.

All three reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise high-quality education, helpful faculty, and a supportive environment. Practical learning and flexibility are also highlighted as strengths.

With an average rating of 4/5 and ~100% positive feedback, students praise good facilities and dynamic classrooms. The single negative review was brief.

Rating distribution
5★
39%
0%
21%
0%
53%
33%
0%
4★
39%
0%
57%
100%
40%
67%
100%
3★
22%
0%
21%
0%
7%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close