Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow - UPJPII vs Virginia Commonwealth University - VCU vs Qassim University vs King Saud University - KSU vs University of Fukui

Side-by-side comparison from 25 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow - UPJPII (5.00)
Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow - UPJPII: wins 4/5 categories
Virginia Commonwealth University - VCU: wins 0/5 categories
Qassim University: wins 0/5 categories
King Saud University - KSU: wins 0/5 categories
University of Fukui: wins 1/5 categories
University of Balamand - UOB: wins 0/5 categories
Lander University: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Philosophy
Richmond, Virginia, United States
4.30
Read more reviews
11 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Buraydah, Saudi Arabia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
4.00
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Greenwood, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Communication Studies
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
4.09
Not rated
4.00
4.00
3.50
4.00
Location
5.00
Win
4.18
Not rated
3.80
3.00
3.75
3.00
Professors
5.00
Win
4.45
Not rated
4.20
4.00
4.25
4.00
Internationality
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
3.00
3.75
4.50
Student life
4.00
3.83
Not rated
3.80
4.00
4.00
4.00
Value
5.00
4.09
Not rated
3.60
5.00
4.25
4.50
Accommodation
3.00
4.11
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
3.50
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Outstanding professors and academic programs
  • +Positive atmosphere and university experience
  • +Historic charm of university buildings
  • +Supportive professors and engaging learning environments
  • +Diverse programs and involvement opportunities
  • +Lively campus and surrounding city atmosphere

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Good student environment and administration
  • +Variety of courses and programs
  • +Scenic, natural environment
  • +Welcoming to exchange students
  • +Strong medical programs
  • +Exceptional professors and rigorous academic programs
  • +Comprehensive and holistic education
  • +Strong foundation and helpful faculty
  • +Dedicated and supportive faculty
  • +Personalized learning and small class sizes
  • +Emphasis on practical, hands-on experience
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and poor course structure are prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from the institution is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues are consistently frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major complaints.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated and insufficient facilities.
  • -Poor communication and administrative support.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant course content.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives exceptionally high marks across several key areas, particularly in Facilities, Professors, Location, and Internationality, all scoring a perfect 5. Student Life also garners a strong rating of 4. The primary area for improvement identified is Accomodation, which received a lower score of 3, suggesting it is the weakest point in the university's offering.

Academic departments and campus amenities stand out with strong scores, notably professors receiving the highest rating. Location and accommodation also score well, indicating a desirable environment and adequate housing. Student life, however, presents a relative area for improvement, scoring the lowest among the surveyed categories. Internationality and value fall within the good to very good range, contributing to an overall positive assessment.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its facilities and accommodation, both receiving a solid 4-star rating. Internationality also scores well at 4 stars. Conversely, value for money appears to be the area needing the most improvement, with a rating of 3.6. Professors and student life are rated favorably, though not reaching the highest marks.

This university scores exceptionally well in accommodations and value, both receiving a perfect 5. Facilities, professors, and student life are also strong, earning a solid 4. Conversely, location and internationality received moderate ratings of 3, indicating areas for potential development.

Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors and perceived value**, both scoring 4.25. Student life also garners a strong 4. The weakest areas are **facilities and accommodation**, each receiving a 3.5 rating. Location and internationality are rated at a respectable 3.75.

This university presents a strong profile, excelling particularly in its **Internationality** and **Value**, both receiving an impressive 4.5. **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life** also scored highly at 4. Areas with moderate scores include **Location** and **Accomodation**, each rated at 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Students are highly satisfied, with 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 5/5. They praise outstanding professors and the academic program, finding the historic buildings appealing.

All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.27/5. Students praised supportive professors, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students praise the diverse learning environment, passionate faculty, and welcoming campus community. Limited negative feedback is not emphasized.

The single review is highly positive, rating 4/5 stars. It highlights the beautiful countryside campus and opportunities for exchange students, particularly in emergency medicine and neuroscience.

With a 4.5/5 average rating from four reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes highlight excellent, intelligent professors and rigorous academic programs. One review noted a lack of lab materials and limited major options at a specific branch.

Both reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight great professors and a well-organized university, emphasizing helpfulness and student success. A positive personalized learning experience and hands-on experience were also noted.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
27%
0%
20%
0%
50%
50%
4★
0%
73%
0%
60%
100%
50%
50%
3★
0%
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

King Saud University review

I a student of king saud University, they have great work environment both research and teaching. But their is lack of professionalism and technical skills.The best part is that you can also take online classes. Overall it was average ☹️

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close