British Columbia Institute of Technology - BCIT vs University of British Columbia vs Lighthouse Labs vs Cornerstone International Community College of Canada vs LaSalle College Vancouver
Side-by-side comparison from 218 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, hands-on learning and projects
- +Industry-experienced instructors and real-world relevance
- +Strong career outcomes and job placement
- +Excellent professors and engaging courses
- +Abundant resources and study spaces
- +Strong career preparation and practical experience
Nothing to show
- +Engaging instructors and practical, real-world skills development
- +Supportive learning environment and personal growth opportunities
- +Focused, valuable programs with diverse, relevant subject matter
- +Experienced faculty and supportive learning environment
- +Modern facilities and equipment
- +Commitment to diversity and inclusion
- +Supportive and helpful teachers
- +Practical co-op experiences
- +excellent, kind teachers and supportive co-op services
- +strong international business program
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of engagement and support from instructors is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and course selection difficulties.
- -Subpar teaching quality and arbitrary grading.
- -Lack of genuine social connections outside of clubs.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of administrative support and clear communication.
- -Ineffective or uninspired teaching and curriculum.
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a significant concern.
- -The teaching quality and course content often fall short of expectations.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a common complaint.
- -Administrative issues and poor communication are frequently mentioned.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are sometimes seen as lacking.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from the administration.
- -Inadequate facilities and resources, often feeling outdated.
- -Overly demanding coursework and a lack of flexibility in learning.
This institution demonstrates a strong performance in its international student experience, reflected by a high rating for Internationality. The location also receives a favorable score. Areas for potential improvement include student life and facilities, which received the lowest ratings among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like professors, accommodation, and overall value are rated positively.
This institution receives strong commendations for its **location (4.46)**, **internationality (4.35)**, and **student life (4.31)**. Facilities and value are also well-regarded, with ratings around 4.08 to 4.22. The **accommodation rating (3.86)** is the lowest among the surveyed aspects, indicating this is an area that could see improvement.
Nothing to show
This institution receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across multiple aspects. Its location stands out as a perfect score, while professors and overall value are also highly regarded. The weakest area, though still strong, is its facilities rating. Student life, internationality, and accommodation are all robustly rated, contributing to a generally excellent university experience.
This institution garners particularly strong ratings in **Internationality (5)**, indicating a well-developed global presence. **Facilities** and **Location** also score highly at 4. Conversely, **Student Life** presents a significant area for improvement, rated only 1.5. **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** all sit in the mid-range, with scores of 3.5, 3, and 3.5 respectively.
Remarkably high scores characterize this institution, with exceptional ratings of 5 in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality. These areas represent the university's strongest points. Conversely, the Accomodation rating of 3 indicates a relative weakness, while the Value score of 4 suggests a generally positive but not outstanding offering in that regard.
This institution garners top marks in every assessed category, indicating exceptional performance. With perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, there are no discernible weak areas. The university excels uniformly, presenting a consistently strong offering to its students.
Nearly all (95%+) of student reviews are positive, praising hands-on learning, industry-experienced instructors, and strong career outcomes. No negative feedback was reported.
With 190 reviews and an average rating of 4.23/5, ~87% of students report positive experiences, citing excellent academics, professors, and campus resources. A small amount of feedback (approx. 1%) noted difficulties with course selection and finding genuine connections.
Nothing to show
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.6/5. Students highlight practical learning, knowledgeable instructors, and a supportive environment. There is no negative feedback in this sample.
With an average rating of 4/5 based on two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight experienced faculty and modern facilities as key strengths. No negative feedback was recorded.
The sole review is highly positive (5/5), praising the Applied Communications course for being helpful to responsible, self-driven students with clear goals. Teachers are noted as very supportive.
With a 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. One review highlights excellent and kind teachers and supportive services for international students.
Nothing to show
I was there as an exchange student from Europe, attending classes at Sauder Business School and the Mechanical Engineering Department. Studying at UBC is definitely a mixed bag in terms of the quality of education. I did have a few great professors who held wonderfully challenging and well-thought-out classes, making me feel that UBC punches above its weight in terms of educational quality. However, some other lectures were undoubtedly subpar. Grading seemed quite arbitrary at times (moving goalposts seems to be a recurring theme at UBC), and the lectures were not nearly as good as they should have been, in my opinion. It is quite fair to say that other exchange students and I were often shocked that UBC allows these courses to occur annually without making efforts to improve them. At UBC as a whole, less is expected from students than at my home university. I've seen people never show up to class and hold presentations that would never fly at my home uni. Professors seems to welcome all questions even if they are about things a fourth-year engineering student just months before graduation needs to know. I am not sure if UBC ensures that its graduates are adequately educated, and would definitely think twice if I was a recruiter and had to hire someone who attented there. From what I have seen, I would tentatively recommend Sauder Business School. For Mechanical Engineering (and probably also Electrical and Civil Engineering), UBC is simply too small, offering a lack of choices and not many lectures; usually, only introductory courses are offered for most topics. I recommend attending a more engineering/science-focused university, such as Waterloo or others in the US or Europe. It is quite astonishing how much money people pay to attend these subpar classes. Enjoyed having a beach on campus.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
