Universidad Anáhuac vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Ironhack vs Gustavo A Madero Technological Institute II - ITGAM II
Side-by-side comparison from 99 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Leadership and values development
- +Academic excellence and practical application
- +Supportive community and modern facilities
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
Nothing to show
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
- +Strong academic programs and practical preparation
- +Supportive and effective professors
- +Excellent facilities and extracurricular opportunities
- +High-quality design education and fostering diverse perspectives
- +Active, collaborative student life with community and creative experimentation
- +Commitment to creative, critical, and socially conscious education
- +Excellent professors and helpful instruction
- +Strong sense of community and welcoming classmates
- +Positive overall experience and quality of education
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
- -Administrative and management issues cause problems.
- -Facilities and resources are inadequate.
- -Course content and teaching methods are outdated.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant environment.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication from instructors leads to confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Nothing to show
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This university receives strong marks in several key areas, with Professors earning the highest rating. Student Life and Location are also well-regarded, alongside Value. Facilities and Internationality are rated moderately well. The weakest area of performance is Accomodation, which received the lowest score among the surveyed categories.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, and student life all received perfect scores, indicating a highly positive experience in these aspects. However, accommodation and internationality are notable weaknesses, scoring significantly lower. Value for money is also rated highly.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, notably achieving perfect scores in **Location** and **Value**. It also garners high marks for **Professors** and **Accomodation**, suggesting a positive experience in these critical aspects. Conversely, **Student Life** received a stark zero, indicating a significant area for improvement. **Facilities** and **Internationality** are rated moderately, placing them in the middle ground of the university's offerings.
With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
Nearly all reviews are positive, praising excellent teachers, good facilities, and strong academic programs. A small percentage of negative feedback was noted.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise its commitment to creative and socially conscious education, high-quality design programs, and fostering a diverse, collaborative environment. There is no negative feedback.
This university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%) with an average rating of 4/5 stars. Students praise professors' expertise and helpfulness, alongside a strong sense of community and welcoming classmates. Minor criticism exists regarding accessibility for disabled students.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
EDINBA is undoubtedly distinguished by its commitment to creative, critical, and socially conscious education. As a public institution, it offers access to high-quality design education, fostering diverse perspectives and constant exchange among students. Student life is characterized by an active and collaborative environment, where workshops, exhibitions, and collective projects strengthen a sense of community and encourage creative experimentation. Addressing current challenges in the field of design—such as digitalization, sustainability, and changes in creative processes—the school seeks to prepare its students to respond ethically and innovatively to the demands of the contemporary context.
Nothing to show
