Universidad Anáhuac vs Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora - ITSON vs Universidad Panamericana vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 65 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 1/4 categories
Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora - ITSON: wins 1/4 categories
Universidad Panamericana: wins 0/4 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 2/4 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/4 categories
Ironhack: wins 0/4 categories
Niger State Polytechnic Zungeru: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Accounting
Aguascalientes, Mexico
4.10
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: Chemistry
Category ratings
Facilities
4.53
5.00
4.33
4.40
Not rated
5.00
3.50
Location
4.49
5.00
4.25
4.70
Not rated
5.00
2.50
Professors
4.42
4.00
4.50
4.60
Win
Not rated
3.00
2.50
Internationality
4.58
3.00
3.33
4.60
Win
Not rated
3.00
2.00
Student life
4.63
5.00
3.67
3.90
Not rated
5.00
3.50
Value
4.58
Win
4.00
4.33
3.90
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Accommodation
4.64
5.00
Win
3.75
3.00
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Integral formation and practical application of knowledge
  • +Focus on developing leaders with values and strategic vision
  • +Academic excellence, personal growth, and community engagement
  • +Excellent staff and well-maintained facilities
  • +Opportunities for positive social connections
  • +Evolving and updated academic programs
  • +Highly qualified professors and academic excellence
  • +Strong business programs and professional connections
  • +Personalized attention and strong sense of community
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Flexible and welcoming environment
  • +Good science education and lab access
  • +Supportive faculty
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Students face difficulties with unresponsive administrative and management issues.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and communication from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Intellectualism is perceived as cultish.
  • -Institutions are seen as unreliable sources of truth.
  • -There's a critique of seeking purpose through complex language and power.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration and faculty.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities and equipment.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and uninspired curriculum.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 4.67. **Value** and **Internationality** also received high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **Professors** at 4.42, which represents the weakest performance among the evaluated aspects. Facilities and location are rated very favorably, around 4.5.

Across surveyed categories, this institution excels in several key areas. Its Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accommodation all received perfect scores, indicating exceptional student experience in these aspects. Professors and Value are also rated positively. The weakest area is Internationality, scoring a 3 out of 5, suggesting room for improvement in global engagement or diversity.

The university is highly rated for its professors, achieving a strong 4.5. Facilities and value also score well, both at 4.33. Student life, while respectable at 3.67, and accommodation at 3.75 represent areas where ratings are somewhat lower. Internationality is rated the lowest among all categories at 3.33.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

A varied performance is indicated by the provided university ratings. The institution shines in its Facilities and Student Life, both receiving a strong 3.5. Value for money also stands out with a 4. Conversely, Internationality is the weakest area, scoring a low 2, while Professors and Location are moderately rated at 2.5. Accommodations sit in the middle with a 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University students overwhelmingly praise its integral formation, practical study plans, and focus on developing leaders. This ~100% positive feedback highlights strong academic programs, professional readiness, and personal growth opportunities.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, university student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Reviews highlight great facilities and staff, with some suggestions for program updates to better prepare students for the real world.

University students praise academic excellence, professor quality, and modern facilities. ~92% of feedback is positive, with one reviewer expressing concerns about intellectualism.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Key themes include a welcoming environment and flexible scheduling. Some minor issues with transportation and lab technicians were noted.

Rating distribution
5★
62%
50%
33%
60%
0%
50%
0%
4★
35%
50%
58%
40%
0%
0%
100%
3★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close