Universidad Anáhuac vs Instituto Tecnologico Superior de Libres - ITSLIBRES vs Fundación Universidad de América vs Universidad Panamericana vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 50 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Anáhuac (4.60)
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 1/6 categories
Instituto Tecnologico Superior de Libres - ITSLIBRES: wins 0/6 categories
Fundación Universidad de América: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Panamericana: wins 1/6 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Ironhack: wins 2/6 categories
De La Salle University-Dasmariñas - DLSU-D: wins 2/6 categories
Comparing
Cancun, Mexico
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
33 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication
Aguascalientes, Mexico
4.10
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: Communication
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
Not rated
1.00
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Location
4.50
Not rated
1.00
4.25
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Professors
4.41
Not rated
1.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Internationality
4.59
Not rated
1.00
3.33
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Student life
4.63
Not rated
1.00
3.67
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Value
4.63
Win
Not rated
1.00
4.33
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Accommodation
4.66
Not rated
1.00
3.75
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and high-quality teaching
  • +Ample green campus spaces
  • +Highly qualified professors and academic excellence
  • +Strong business programs and professional connections
  • +Personalized attention and strong sense of community

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Top business and engineering programs
  • +Good facilities and campus
  • +Easy admissions
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated curriculum and lack of focus on professional development.
  • -Poor administrative and management practices.
  • -Limited international opportunities and low university ranking.
  • -Intellectualism is perceived as cultish.
  • -Institutions are seen as unreliable sources of truth.
  • -There's a critique of seeking purpose through complex language and power.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources detract from the learning experience.
  • -Limited career support and vague future prospects cause student dissatisfaction.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional performance across all surveyed categories, receiving a perfect score of 1 in every aspect. Consequently, there are no distinct strongest or weakest areas, as the university excels uniformly in its facilities, professor quality, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. This indicates a remarkably consistent and high-achieving environment.

The university is highly rated for its professors, achieving a strong 4.5. Facilities and value also score well, both at 4.33. Student life, while respectable at 3.67, and accommodation at 3.75 represent areas where ratings are somewhat lower. Internationality is rated the lowest among all categories at 3.33.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This institution shines brightly in student life, accommodation, and internationality, all receiving perfect scores. Its location also garners a high rating. Conversely, facilities and professors are areas where the university shows the most room for improvement, each scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5. The overall value is considered good.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

With a 2.5/5 average rating, reviews are split evenly, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative feedback. Positive comments highlight green spaces and satisfactory teaching quality. Negative reviews criticize obsolete curriculum, focus on money, and lack of international agreements or research promotion.

University students praise academic excellence, professor quality, and modern facilities. ~92% of feedback is positive, with one reviewer expressing concerns about intellectualism.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students praise its large campus, good facilities, and straightforward admissions. The Business and Engineering departments are highlighted as particularly strong.

Rating distribution
5★
67%
0%
0%
33%
0%
50%
0%
4★
39%
0%
50%
58%
0%
0%
100%
3★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
50%
8%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The worst experience

Do not study here, there are other better universities. The pensum are obsolete. The university is only interested in money. There are no international agreements, they do not have a good ranking, they do not promote research or culture of professional development

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close