Universidad Anáhuac vs Instituto Superior de Intérpretes y Traductores - ISIT vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Ironhack

Side-by-side comparison from 49 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana campus Azcapotzalco - UAM AZCAPOTZALCO (5.00)
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 0/5 categories
Instituto Superior de Intérpretes y Traductores - ISIT: wins 0/5 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 1/5 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/5 categories
Ironhack: wins 1/5 categories
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana campus Azcapotzalco - UAM AZCAPOTZALCO : wins 3/5 categories
UMOV Academy - Umov academy: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: School of Business/Management
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
Not rated
4.40
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
Location
4.50
Not rated
4.70
Not rated
5.00
5.00
2.00
Professors
4.41
Not rated
4.60
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Internationality
4.59
Not rated
4.60
Win
Not rated
3.00
4.00
2.50
Student life
4.63
Not rated
3.90
Not rated
5.00
5.00
4.00
Value
4.63
Not rated
3.90
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
3.50
Accommodation
4.66
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
1.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Comprehensive economics curriculum with diverse perspectives
  • +Pleasant campus environment and well-stocked library
  • +Accessible location with good transportation options
  • +Flexible and accessible learning
  • +Practical, up-to-date content
  • +Supportive teaching and student services
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Instruction quality and course content are often found lacking.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This institution garners impressive scores across several key areas. Professors, location, student life, accommodation, and value all received perfect marks, indicating exceptional strengths in these domains. Facilities and internationality were also highly rated, though slightly less so than the top-scoring categories. Overall, the university demonstrates a strong offering in its student experience and perceived worth.

This institution excels in several key areas, with particularly high marks for its Facilities, Professors, and Student Life, all receiving a 4 out of 5. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as a significant weakness, scoring a low 1. The Location and Internationality also received moderate ratings of 2 and 2.5 respectively, while Value for money is rated at a respectable 3.5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise the academic program's broad scope, accessible transportation, and pleasant campus environment. There is no negative feedback to report.

With a high average rating of 4.5/5, these university student reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the flexible, accessible platform and well-structured, practical content. Support and pacing are also frequently highlighted as strengths.

Rating distribution
5★
67%
0%
60%
0%
50%
100%
50%
4★
39%
0%
40%
0%
0%
0%
50%
3★
3%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close