Universidad Anáhuac vs Instituto Superior de Intérpretes y Traductores - ISIT vs Universidad en Línea - UTEL vs Colegio Nacional de Educación Profesional Técnica - CONALEP vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris

Side-by-side comparison from 79 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.70)
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 2/7 categories
Instituto Superior de Intérpretes y Traductores - ISIT: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad en Línea - UTEL: wins 0/7 categories
Colegio Nacional de Educación Profesional Técnica - CONALEP: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 2/7 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Ironhack: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Engineering of Computing Systems
Best programme: Chemical and Process Engineering
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
9 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
Not rated
3.67
3.10
4.56
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
4.50
Not rated
4.67
4.10
4.78
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.41
Not rated
4.33
4.30
4.67
Win
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
4.59
Not rated
3.67
3.20
4.67
Win
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.63
Not rated
3.67
3.89
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.63
Win
Not rated
3.67
4.20
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
4.66
Win
Not rated
3.33
2.80
3.22
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Expert professors and practical career knowledge
  • +Flexible online learning options
  • +Valuable skill development and enriching experience
  • +Accessible short career options with good teachers
  • +Personal and academic improvement opportunities
  • +Direct path to employment after high school
  • +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
  • +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
  • +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of practical application and insufficient support hinder learning.
  • -Limited food variety and a small library with few books are dissatisfying.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

Nothing to show

Across several key areas, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its location and professors are particularly well-regarded, receiving the highest ratings. Conversely, accommodation emerges as the weakest point, scoring lowest among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like facilities, student life, internationality, and value are rated moderately, suggesting areas for potential improvement while maintaining a generally positive standing.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its academic offerings and surrounding environment. Professors received a near-perfect score of 4.3, complemented by a highly rated location (4.1) and strong value for money (4.2). Student life also scored well at 3.89. Conversely, accommodation emerged as the primary area for improvement, with a rating of 2.8, followed by facilities at 3.1. Internationality stands at a moderate 3.2.

This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~67% of reviews are positive. Students highlight qualified professors and a positive online learning experience, including acquiring career-relevant knowledge and reinforcing computer skills. No negative reviews were recorded.

With an average rating of 4.32/5 from 31 reviews, approximately 97% are positive. Students praise accessible teachers and career opportunities. Some negative feedback notes small spaces and untidy bathrooms.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Rating distribution
5★
67%
0%
67%
55%
67%
0%
50%
4★
39%
0%
0%
29%
33%
0%
0%
3★
3%
100%
33%
13%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
50%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close