Budapest Business University - BBU vs Evelyn Hone College of Applied Arts and Commerce - Ehc vs Midlands State University vs Supershine University vs Texila American University

Side-by-side comparison from 42 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Texila American University (5.00)
Budapest Business University - BBU: wins 0/5 categories
Evelyn Hone College of Applied Arts and Commerce - Ehc: wins 1/5 categories
Midlands State University: wins 1/5 categories
Supershine University: wins 0/5 categories
Texila American University: wins 2/5 categories
Dovecot College of Nursing: wins 0/5 categories
Ton Duc Thang University - TDTU: wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Tourism and Catering
Best programme: Education
Best programme: Peace and Conflict Studies
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
East Bank Demerara, Guyana
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Medicine and Surgery
Best programme: Computer Science and Information Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
3.79
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
4.05
Not rated
4.38
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
Professors
3.89
5.00
4.29
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
4.50
Internationality
3.95
5.00
3.82
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
3.50
Student life
3.63
4.00
4.31
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Value
3.89
5.00
Win
4.47
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.50
Accommodation
3.37
3.00
4.20
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical knowledge and real-world application
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
  • +Strong student support and well-structured courses
  • +Fosters growth and independence through challenging, self-reliant learning.
  • +Top-tier lecturers and strong academic programmes
  • +Diverse student body and international exposure
  • +Opportunities for growth and career preparation

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse student body and multicultural interactions
  • +Abundant resources and supportive lecturers

Nothing to show

  • +Spacious, clean, modern campus and well-equipped labs
  • +Supportive lecturers and friendly, disciplined student environment
  • +Engaging student life with practical activities and facilities
Cons
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues.
  • -Unprofessional teaching staff and language barriers.
  • -Disorganized structure and struggles with course registration.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -Students express dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
  • -Lack of communication and unresponsiveness from staff are major complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -The curriculum is frequently perceived as irrelevant or too theoretical.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a perceived lack of support from faculty and staff are common complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners a strong overall rating, with Location emerging as its most celebrated aspect. Professors and Value are also highly regarded. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score. Student Life and Facilities are mid-range, while Internationality is also a notable strength. The university presents a generally positive picture, with distinct areas of excellence and areas for potential improvement.

This institution excels in several key areas, notably achieving perfect scores for its professors and internationality, alongside a top rating for value. Student life and accommodation are also strengths, both receiving a solid four. Conversely, the university's location received a zero, indicating a significant area for improvement. Facilities also received a moderate rating of three.

This institution demonstrates a strong overall performance, with its **Value** and **Location** standing out as particularly high-rated areas. **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Professors** also received very positive scores, indicating a well-rounded experience. The **Facilities** are rated well, though slightly lower than these top-performing categories. The **Internationality** score represents the weakest area in this assessment.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its professors, location, student life, and internationality. However, its facilities received a zero rating, indicating a significant area for improvement. Accommodation and value for money are rated moderately, suggesting a balanced but not exceptional experience in these aspects.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in its physical resources, with **Facilities** receiving a perfect score of 5. Professors and location are also highly rated at 4.5, contributing to a positive learning environment. Student life and internationality are respectable, while value for money is also strong at 4.5. The most significant area for improvement is **Accomodation**, which is rated 0.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~57% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical knowledge and professional, up-to-date teachers. ~9.5% of feedback indicates issues with communication and organization.

The university receives positive feedback, with one review rating it 4 out of 5 stars. This positive sentiment represents 100% of the feedback, highlighting a good learning environment that fosters independence and hard work.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.65 average rating. ~94% of feedback highlights top-tier lecturers, a nurturing learning culture, and diverse student experiences. A small amount of feedback (~6%) notes challenges with accommodation security and booking policies.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, all feedback is positive. Students highlight a diversity of international students and available resources. Admin staff are noted for needing improvement.

Nothing to show

With a 4.5/5 average rating, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100% positive). Reviews highlight a good, comfortable learning environment with a clean, spacious, and well-equipped campus, including good labs and sports facilities.

Rating distribution
5★
29%
0%
71%
0%
100%
0%
50%
4★
29%
100%
24%
0%
0%
0%
50%
3★
33%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Dynamic environment and teachers

The environment is good and it’s multicultural The compound is really nice but a bit far(depending on the faculty) They should have a sports team because of the facilities that they have They should really consider the sports career of the university

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close