Budapest Business University - BBU vs University of Szeged vs ESSCA School of Management vs Corvinus Business School vs Budapest Metropolitan University
Side-by-side comparison from 94 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical knowledge and real-world application
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Strong student support and well-structured courses
- +Strong academic programmes and learning support
- +Approachable and knowledgeable faculty
- +Welcoming and supportive international student environment
- +High-quality, practical education with specialized pathways.
- +Supportive, close-knit learning environment and friendly atmosphere.
- +Vibrant campus life with numerous enriching activities and social connections.
- +Challenging and skill-enriching academic environment
- +Positive overall experience despite external factors
- +Supportive scholarship opportunities
- +Unique, broad, and exploratory learning approach
- +Modern, open-minded environment
- +Innovative learning environment and supportive community
- +Internationalization and cultural diversity
- +Accomplished faculty and top-notch facilities
- +Practical, up-to-date curriculum with real-world focus
- +Affordable, international study environment
- +Welcoming city with good social opportunities
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Unprofessional teaching staff and language barriers.
- -Disorganized structure and struggles with course registration.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency cause confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Poor quality and preparedness of professors
- -Lack of relevance in courses and teaching
- -Ineffective organization and management
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching methods are frequently seen as unengaging and irrelevant.
- -Lack of practical skills and real-world application in the curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of adequate support and communication leaves students feeling unsupported.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
This university garners a strong overall rating, with Location emerging as its most celebrated aspect. Professors and Value are also highly regarded. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score. Student Life and Facilities are mid-range, while Internationality is also a notable strength. The university presents a generally positive picture, with distinct areas of excellence and areas for potential improvement.
Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance across several key areas. Student Life is a clear standout, achieving the highest rating. Professors and Internationality also receive strong marks. However, Accommodations present the weakest area, with a comparatively lower score. Facilities, Location, and Value fall within the generally positive range.
This institution excels in its **location**, receiving the highest rating. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded. However, **accommodation** presents the weakest area, with a lower score compared to other aspects. The university demonstrates a solid standing in facilities and professors, with value also scoring respectably.
This institution garners exceptional marks for its **location, student life, internationality, and overall value**, all receiving perfect scores. The quality of its **professors** is also highly praised. However, areas for improvement are evident in **facilities and accommodation**, which received lower, albeit still adequate, ratings.
This university presents a generally positive but mixed picture. Its strongest areas include Internationality, scoring a solid 4. Professors also received a commendable rating of 3.67. Conversely, Student Life and Accommodation are its weakest points, both averaging a 3. Facilities, Location, and Value are all rated moderately at 3.33.
This institution garners strong marks across several aspects. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by accommodation. Professors and student life also received commendable scores. While facilities and internationality performed well, the value proposition emerged as the lowest-rated category. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with a particular strength in its physical setting and living arrangements.
This university garners high marks in several key areas, with Internationality and Location being particularly strong at 4.64 and 4.57 respectively. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive excellent scores, all above 4.35. Accommodations are rated well at 4.21. Student Life, however, is the weakest area with a rating of 3.8.
~57% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical knowledge and professional, up-to-date teachers. ~9.5% of feedback indicates issues with communication and organization.
University of Szeged receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~84% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise the diverse faculties, excellent library, and strong support for international students. There are no 1-2 star reviews.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good knowledge transfer, practical experience, and vibrant campus life. A small portion (~8%) of negative feedback mentions unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.
This university receives very positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being 4-5 stars. Students highlight the nourishing of skills and a competitive yet positive environment. Accommodation costs are noted as high.
With an average rating of 3/5, student feedback is mixed. Approximately 33% of reviews are negative, citing a lack of technical skills and real-world experience. Positive comments highlight the university's unique, modern, and open-minded approach.
The University of Miskolc receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being highly favorable. Students praise cutting-edge labs, approachable professors, a supportive community, and internationalization. No negative feedback was noted.
~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, up-to-date curricula and hands-on learning. Negative feedback, representing ~0%, was not provided.
The environment is good and it’s multicultural The compound is really nice but a bit far(depending on the faculty) They should have a sports team because of the facilities that they have They should really consider the sports career of the university
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience with the Business Development Master’s program has been really great overall. It offers high-quality education with practical knowledge. The courses are well-structured. The program has been renewed and designed to match current business trends, not just old-school textbook knowledge. We worked on a bunch of case studies, group projects, and presentations. We also experienced real business scenarios in every semester from subjects like Project Management, Tutorial: Startup Lab, Marketing Analysis and Planning, ESG, etc. Another important factor is affordability. Compared to many other master’s programs in Europe, this one gives really good value for money. You’re getting a strong education, experienced lecturers, and a modern curriculum, without the crazy tuition fees you’d expect elsewhere. The programme also feels fresh and up-to-date. Topics like innovation, strategy, and business development are approached in a way that reflects what’s actually happening in the business world today. The atmosphere is great. The community is diverse, and working with people from different backgrounds adds a lot to the experience. Plus you can meet different cultures and get new friends from all around the World. Also the study department is a huge help for every student. I used to be a Student Representative and working with the staff was easy, because they supported and informed us constantly. Overall, I’d say the Business Development Master’s at PTE KTK is a great choice if you’re looking for something modern, practical, and affordable, without sacrificing quality.
