Universidad Metropolitana de Monterrey - UMM vs Egerton University vs Nova Southeastern University - NSU Florida vs Sol Plaatje University vs University of the Philippines Manila - UPM

Side-by-side comparison from 73 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Metropolitana de Monterrey - UMM: wins 0/0 categories
Egerton University: wins 0/0 categories
Nova Southeastern University - NSU Florida: wins 0/0 categories
Sol Plaatje University: wins 0/0 categories
University of the Philippines Manila - UPM: wins 0/0 categories
Free University of Great Lake - FUGL: wins 0/0 categories
BGMEA University of Fashion & Technology: wins 0/0 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Commerce in Accounting
Best programme: Biology
Kimberley, South Africa
4.30
Read more reviews
7 reviews
×
Best programme: Arts and Humanities
Best programme: Behavioral and Social Sciences
Best programme: BBA in Accounting and Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.13
4.29
4.33
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Location
Not rated
4.19
4.57
4.33
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Professors
Not rated
4.48
4.43
4.57
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
Not rated
3.98
4.57
3.29
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Student life
Not rated
4.37
4.14
4.29
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Value
Not rated
4.27
4.00
4.43
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
Not rated
4.00
4.14
4.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Dedicated teachers and responsive administration
  • +Value for money despite fee increases
  • +Support for student feedback
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive, knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Conducive environment for growth and vibrant campus community
  • +Practical learning, research opportunities, and post-graduation opportunities
  • +Supportive staff and personal growth opportunities
  • +Engaging social events and teacher availability
  • +Strong academic programs and smaller class sizes
  • +Supportive lecturers and academic environment
  • +Modern facilities and inclusive campus
  • +Practical learning for career readiness
  • +Health and science focus
  • +Practical communication skills

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and engaging learning environment.
  • +Comprehensive and relevant business course content.
  • +Practical application of learned concepts.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources were a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of engagement and outdated curriculum led to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.
  • -Exaggerated claims and unmet expectations.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication and feedback from instructors are often lacking or poor.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant source of frustration.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication create unnecessary hurdles.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching methods and uninspired curriculum can make learning feel tedious.
Rating summary
What students say

Offering a consistent score of zero across all evaluated categories, this institution presents a uniform picture in its current ratings. There are no distinct strengths or weaknesses to highlight, as all aspects, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, are rated equally low.

This university garners strong marks, with Professors and Student Life standing out as particularly well-regarded areas, achieving scores of 4.48 and 4.37 respectively. Facilities and Location also score well above average. Value for money is also highly rated. The weakest area identified is Internationality, with a score just below 4.

This institution generally scores well across key aspects. Its strongest areas include Location and Internationality, both receiving a high rating of 4.57. Professors are also highly regarded at 4.43. Facilities and Student Life are rated similarly, at 4.29 and 4.14 respectively, with Accommodation also at 4.14. The sole area scoring lower than the rest is Value, which received a rating of 4.

This institution demonstrates a strong academic environment, with professors receiving the highest marks at 4.57. Facilities and location also score well, both at 4.33. Student life is rated positively at 4.29, and value for money is a notable strength at 4.43. Accommodation is rated at a solid 4.0. The area with the lowest rating is Internationality, at 3.29.

Across the board, this institution garners perfect scores, indicating excellence in every surveyed area. Particularly outstanding are its facilities and professors, both receiving top marks. While no weak areas are identified, the consistent five-star ratings suggest a remarkably well-rounded and highly desirable university experience across all aspects of student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value.

Nothing to show

Remarkably, this institution achieves a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every evaluated aspect. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all considered exemplary. This suggests a consistently outstanding experience for students across the board, with no particular area lagging behind.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The sole review is positive, rating the university 4 out of 5 stars. It praises good teachers who care about student learning, while also noting consistent tuition fee increases.

Over 93% of 56 reviews are positive, praising quality education, strong lecturer-student relationships, and a conducive growth environment with well-structured curriculum and facilities. No negative reviews were provided.

Approximately 86% of reviews are positive, highlighting personal and professional growth, supportive staff, and academic opportunities. One negative review cited exaggeration of campus amenities and a disappointing experience.

University reviews show strong satisfaction, with approximately 100% positive feedback. Students praise dedicated lecturers, modern facilities, and a supportive environment fostering personal and professional growth.

The single review for the university is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This suggests ~100% satisfaction, with commendations for its focus on health and sciences, and valuable learning in behavioral science.

Nothing to show

This university has a perfect 5/5 average rating, with 100% positive feedback. The student found the learning environment supportive and engaging, with relevant coursework in business administration.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
48%
43%
43%
100%
0%
100%
4★
100%
43%
43%
43%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
9%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Quality

I like the university offers quality holistics world class training that meets the 21st needs. The programmes offered are competitve embedding the technologies, research, innovation and industrial linkages/collaborations

Nothing to show

Communication and Planning

Their method of communication is clashing, it is not directed to specific people or departments. Academic events clash with classes, which makes it difficult for students to attend important events. Yes I would recommend it to only those who are good decision makers who can properly prioritise.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close