Universidad Metropolitana de Monterrey - UMM vs Bina Nusantara University - UBN vs Egerton University vs Sol Plaatje University vs University of the Philippines Manila - UPM
Side-by-side comparison from 80 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Dedicated teachers and responsive administration
- +Value for money despite fee increases
- +Support for student feedback
- +Diverse study programs and numerous student organizations
- +Supportive lecturers and accommodating, modern facilities
- +Opportunities for personal growth and peer connection
- +Strong academic programs and supportive, knowledgeable lecturers
- +Conducive environment for growth and vibrant campus community
- +Practical learning, research opportunities, and post-graduation opportunities
- +Supportive lecturers and academic environment
- +Modern facilities and inclusive campus
- +Practical learning for career readiness
- +Health and science focus
- +Practical communication skills
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and engaging learning environment.
- +Comprehensive and relevant business course content.
- +Practical application of learned concepts.
- -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources were a significant drawback.
- -Lack of engagement and outdated curriculum led to dissatisfaction.
- -Inefficient administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Communication and feedback from instructors are often lacking or poor.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant source of frustration.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication create unnecessary hurdles.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and uninspired curriculum can make learning feel tedious.
Offering a consistent score of zero across all evaluated categories, this institution presents a uniform picture in its current ratings. There are no distinct strengths or weaknesses to highlight, as all aspects, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, are rated equally low.
Across various evaluated aspects, this institution receives strong marks. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by its professors and overall value. Accommodation and student life also score very well. The weakest performing category, though still positive, is location.
This university garners strong marks, with Professors and Student Life standing out as particularly well-regarded areas, achieving scores of 4.48 and 4.37 respectively. Facilities and Location also score well above average. Value for money is also highly rated. The weakest area identified is Internationality, with a score just below 4.
This institution demonstrates a strong academic environment, with professors receiving the highest marks at 4.57. Facilities and location also score well, both at 4.33. Student life is rated positively at 4.29, and value for money is a notable strength at 4.43. Accommodation is rated at a solid 4.0. The area with the lowest rating is Internationality, at 3.29.
Across the board, this institution garners perfect scores, indicating excellence in every surveyed area. Particularly outstanding are its facilities and professors, both receiving top marks. While no weak areas are identified, the consistent five-star ratings suggest a remarkably well-rounded and highly desirable university experience across all aspects of student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value.
Nothing to show
Remarkably, this institution achieves a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every evaluated aspect. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all considered exemplary. This suggests a consistently outstanding experience for students across the board, with no particular area lagging behind.
The sole review is positive, rating the university 4 out of 5 stars. It praises good teachers who care about student learning, while also noting consistent tuition fee increases.
All 14 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students highlight engaging study programs, personal growth opportunities, and accommodating lecturers and facilities. Extracurriculars and modern campuses are also frequently praised.
Over 93% of 56 reviews are positive, praising quality education, strong lecturer-student relationships, and a conducive growth environment with well-structured curriculum and facilities. No negative reviews were provided.
University reviews show strong satisfaction, with approximately 100% positive feedback. Students praise dedicated lecturers, modern facilities, and a supportive environment fostering personal and professional growth.
The single review for the university is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This suggests ~100% satisfaction, with commendations for its focus on health and sciences, and valuable learning in behavioral science.
Nothing to show
This university has a perfect 5/5 average rating, with 100% positive feedback. The student found the learning environment supportive and engaging, with relevant coursework in business administration.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I like the university offers quality holistics world class training that meets the 21st needs. The programmes offered are competitve embedding the technologies, research, innovation and industrial linkages/collaborations
Their method of communication is clashing, it is not directed to specific people or departments. Academic events clash with classes, which makes it difficult for students to attend important events. Yes I would recommend it to only those who are good decision makers who can properly prioritise.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show