University of Wroclaw - UWr vs Gdansk Medical University vs Gdansk University of Technology vs University of Lodz - UL vs University of Gdańsk - UG
Side-by-side comparison from 248 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Helpful and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Enriching academic and personal development opportunities
- +Great student city atmosphere and global opportunities
- +Well-organized programs with understanding professors and modern infrastructure.
- +Globally recognized curriculum and the opportunity to interact with international students.
- +Challenging yet rewarding studies and affordable tuition fees.
- +High-quality, relevant courses and effective, caring professors
- +Positive and welcoming student life and campus environment
- +Strong industry connections and labor market reputation
- +High-quality education with excellent, approachable professors and a supportive atmosphere.
- +Diverse, international, and social environment with many opportunities.
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a positive urban setting.
- +Supportive and accessible faculty
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Vibrant community and ample opportunities
- +Flexible study options for balancing work and life
- +Supportive and welcoming community
- +High-quality nursing program with hands-on experience
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable professors
- +Excellent resources, including new and fast computers
- -Outdated facilities and underfunding are evident.
- -Course content and program structure are not suitable for all students.
- -Limited career opportunities beyond specific fields are a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues caused frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detracted from the learning experience.
- -Limited resources and support were a recurring concern.
- -Outdated courses and unprepared or arrogant instructors are a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues often hinder the student experience.
- -Poor organization and unclear expectations regarding grading and assessments are frustrating.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of efficient management.
- -Outdated or poorly maintained facilities and resources.
- -Unengaging curriculum and ineffective teaching methods.
- -Disorganized class schedules and perceived unnecessary content.
- -Administrative and management issues impacting educational development.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Poor quality of education
- -Disregard for student well-being
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources significantly hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in the curriculum is a major concern.
This university performs exceptionally well in **Location**, earning a top rating. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out with strong scores. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the lowest-rated aspect, though still a respectable score. Other areas like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a generally positive range.
This university demonstrates considerable strengths in internationality and value, both scoring a high 4.5. Its location is also a significant positive at 4.25. Facilities and professors receive solid marks at 4. The university's weakest area is accommodation, which scores a notably lower 2.5, while student life sits at 3.75.
This university garners a robust overall rating, with its **location** standing out as its strongest asset. Student life also scores highly, indicating a vibrant campus experience. Areas such as **facilities** and **professors** received solid, though less exceptional, scores. Accommodation, internationality, and value for money are all rated well, suggesting a generally positive and well-rounded environment for students.
This institution garners strong ratings across several key areas. Location and value are particularly well-regarded, achieving scores over 4.2. Internationality and professors also score highly, exceeding 4.1. While student life and accommodation are rated positively, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories.
This university garners strong reviews in key areas, with the highest marks awarded for Location (4.10) and Student Life (4.05). Professors also received favorable ratings at 4.07. Accommodation stands out as the weakest area, receiving a rating of 3.73, followed closely by Value at 3.84 and Internationality at 3.89. Facilities rated well at 4.02.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas, notably Facilities, Location, and Accomodation, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Student Life and Professors also stand out with strong scores of 3.75. Internationality is the area with the lowest rating at 3.5, though still respectable. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and positive picture.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution achieves a perfect score. Each aspect, from its modern facilities and experienced professors to its vibrant student life and convenient location, is rated a flawless five. Accommodation and internationality also receive top marks, suggesting a well-rounded and highly satisfactory experience for students. With a perfect value rating, the university appears to excel in all measured areas, presenting no discernible weak points.
With ~83% of 67 reviews being positive, students praise helpful lecturers, great atmosphere, and academic/personal growth opportunities. A small ~4.5% of negative feedback mentions disappointing course relevance and limited opportunities.
With an average rating of 4/5, ~75% of reviews are positive. Students highlight good organization, strong theoretical teaching, and international opportunities. Some mention overwhelming workloads.
Most reviews are positive (~79%), highlighting good programs, friendly people, and a positive atmosphere. Some feedback (~7.1%) suggests areas for improvement in course content and teaching.
With a 4.13/5 average rating from 98 reviews, ~94% are positive, highlighting a high-quality education, supportive academic staff, and a social, dynamic city. No negative feedback was received.
A vast majority of reviews are positive, highlighting warm and helpful staff, practical and engaging classes, and a welcoming environment. A very small percentage of feedback mentioned low organization and system limitations.
Most reviews are positive (~75%), highlighting flexibility for work-study balance and personal/professional growth, particularly in the nursing program. Some negative feedback exists (~25%), citing disorganization and a focus on profit.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, feedback is entirely positive (~100%). Students praise good professors and high teaching levels. Fast, new computers also contributed to a positive experience.
As a current master's student in the Communication Management program at the University of Wroclaw, I can confidently say that this journey has been one of the most enriching experiences of my life, not only academically, but also personally and professionally. 1. Global opportunities through Erasmus+: During my time here, I’ve joined two short-term BIP exchange programs in Spain and Romania (with a generous grant), and have a one-year exchange in Germany. These experiences have allowed me to meet peers from across Europe, learn in diverse settings, and grow both culturally and intellectually. 2. Serious research, strong support: I’m currently representing our Institute in a Monography research project of UWr, a valuable opportunity to engage deeply with academic work and collaborate with professors in a meaningful way. The opportunity is open for all students who wanna pursue an academic path. 3. Supportive and passionate faculty: The professors are not only knowledgeable but also truly approachable. In the first semester, I approached my professor for guidance on career path, research opportunities, and expressed my interest. She shared insightful experiences, motivated and encouraged me a lot. And she nominated me for the Monography research project under her supervision, and I got the opportunity. I'm grateful, honestly. 4. Practice-oriented learning: Unlike many programs that are heavy on theory, this one focuses on real-world projects, case studies, and group work - ideal for master's-level students who want to build practical skills for the workplace. Actually, I don't face much study pressure, I enjoy the courses. 5. International Office that really cares: The International Office team is incredibly helpful. During the application process, I was surprised that they always responded to my email inquiries quickly and helped me resolve any issues. When I study here, from paperworks support to academic/exchange activities, they are always ready to assist and create a welcoming environment for students from all over the world. 6. Peaceful lifestyle & affordable living: Wroclaw is a charming, student-friendly city with a mix of history and modernity. The cost of living is reasonable, making it accessible for many international students without compromising on quality of life. I travelled to many cities in European countries, but Wroclaw is one of the most peaceful and affordable cities. Although the English skills of the city officers are limited, they always try to support by using Google Translate or finding support people. Studying at the University of Wroclaw has opened doors I never imagined: from international networks to research, from personal growth to professional clarity. If you're looking for an educational experience that truly takes you beyond the classroom, this could be your next big step. I appreciate this experience and believe that this is a worthy step to open up many opportunities to explore the world!
Nothing to show
After 2 academic years at GUT, I can say with confidence that I have really enjoyed my time in here! Starting from classes/lectures and integration events to the location of the University, I have been satisfied mostly about everything. I could see that GUT had a very high reputation in terms of labor market for businesses, where representatives of companies and big corporations come to look for new candidates for their organizations by organising job fairs, lectures etc. For example, I had a chance to take part in such a lecture arranged by State Street Bank representatives and passed tests organised later on. As a result, several students and I were granted a summer internship, after which most of us including me continued working there. So, in terms of finding a job while still being a student GUT is highly recommended as most of the professors are flexible when it comes to attendance. Additionally, you can easily integrate by joining Erasmus ;) they always have something planned like party, meetings, games, trips etc. I have met many interesting people/brains/personalities/characters and made many friends. So, I have no regrets at all choosing GUT as a university for my Master's degree! I would make the same choice if I had to choose again ;)
I was an international student at the University of Lodz in Poland. I am very happy that I choose this university for my masters studies. May be for some one its not but the overall discipline is appreciable.
The university is well organised and both professors and staff are helpful and friendly. The university is located in northern part of Poland. Which is near to the sea. The city is very beautiful. But some polish people don’t like foreigners.
If you have the option to study in Poland, then do not enroll in this school. This school has been a pain for many international students. They are an unorganized institution, and I do not even want to start explaining why they are already on the probationary list with the Polish government. Instead of providing higher education services to students, they tend to focus more on earning money from them rather than delivering high-quality education. You would be better off studying at other universities instead of this one. They have changed their name; it is now Powiślańska Akademia Nauk Stosowanych.
Nothing to show
