University of Wroclaw - UWr vs Gdansk Medical University vs Gdansk University of Technology vs University of Lodz - UL vs University of Gdańsk - UG
Side-by-side comparison from 301 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality education and excellent professors
- +Valuable practical experience and research opportunities
- +Enjoyable student life in a beautiful city
- +Well-organized programs with understanding professors and modern infrastructure.
- +Globally recognized curriculum and the opportunity to interact with international students.
- +Challenging yet rewarding studies and affordable tuition fees.
- +Strong academic programmes and helpful professors
- +Positive environment and friendly people
- +Good career prospects and university reputation
- +High-quality education with excellent, approachable professors and a supportive atmosphere.
- +Diverse, international, and social environment with many opportunities.
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a positive urban setting.
- +Supportive and interactive teachers
- +Helpful staff and ample opportunities
- +Engaging learning environment
- +Strong academic programs and accreditations
- +Commitment to student development and success
- +Practical learning through internships and workshops
- +Flexible study options for balancing work and life
- +Supportive and welcoming community
- +High-quality nursing program with hands-on experience
- -Outdated facilities and underfunding are a significant issue.
- -Course content is often irrelevant for students with a relevant BA.
- -Program lacks promised opportunities beyond specific career paths.
- -Administrative and management issues caused frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detracted from the learning experience.
- -Limited resources and support were a recurring concern.
- -Outdated courses and unprepared or arrogant instructors.
- -Administrative and management issues impacting the student experience.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of efficient management.
- -Outdated or poorly maintained facilities and resources.
- -Unengaging curriculum and ineffective teaching methods.
- -Organizational issues with class structure and potentially unnecessary content.
- -Limited opportunities for personal development within the education system.
- -Administrative and registration errors cause significant hassle and unexpected costs.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of engaging learning environments are prevalent.
- -Inadequate student support, including limited facilities and poor communication, detracts from the experience.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Poor quality of education
- -Disregard for student well-being
This university garners strong feedback across several key areas. The location stands out as the highest-rated aspect, achieving a score of 4.8. Professors also received excellent marks, with a rating of 4.45. Accommodation represents the lowest score among the surveyed categories at 4.01. Overall, student life, facilities, and internationality also received favorable ratings between 4.1 and 4.2.
This university demonstrates considerable strengths in internationality and value, both scoring a high 4.5. Its location is also a significant positive at 4.25. Facilities and professors receive solid marks at 4. The university's weakest area is accommodation, which scores a notably lower 2.5, while student life sits at 3.75.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in location, with a rating of 4.67, and student life, at 4.47. Facilities and professors also received solid scores of 4.06. Accommodations are rated highly at 4.3, while internationality stands at 4.17. Value for money is also positive at 4.2. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile, with its geographical setting and campus experience being particularly notable.
This institution garners strong ratings across several key areas. Location and value are particularly well-regarded, achieving scores over 4.2. Internationality and professors also score highly, exceeding 4.1. While student life and accommodation are rated positively, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories.
This university garners solid reviews across most aspects of student experience. Location stands out as its strongest point, with a high rating. However, accommodation received the lowest score, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Ratings for facilities, professors, student life, internationality, and value all fall within a generally positive range, indicating a well-rounded but not exceptional experience in these departments.
An overall positive assessment emerges from these university ratings, with the institution excelling in **Location** (4.37) and **Internationality** (4.24). **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive high marks, both scoring approximately 4.17. The areas receiving the lowest scores are **Accomodation** (3.59), indicating room for improvement in this aspect, followed by **Student Life** and **Value**, both rated around 3.9.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas, notably Facilities, Location, and Accomodation, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Student Life and Professors also stand out with strong scores of 3.75. Internationality is the area with the lowest rating at 3.5, though still respectable. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and positive picture.
With a 4.37/5 average, ~96% of reviews are positive, praising high-quality education, engaged professors, practical opportunities, and the city. A small percentage (~4%) mention disappointment with specific course content and limited opportunities in some programs.
With an average rating of 4/5, ~75% of reviews are positive. Students highlight good organization, strong theoretical teaching, and international opportunities. Some mention overwhelming workloads.
With a 3.87 average rating from 15 reviews, about 74% are positive, highlighting friendly people, good programs, and a nice environment. A small portion, ~7%, mentioned some outdated courses and unhelpful teachers.
With a 4.13/5 average rating from 98 reviews, ~94% are positive, highlighting a high-quality education, supportive academic staff, and a social, dynamic city. No negative feedback was received.
Approximately 98.4% of reviews are positive, highlighting warm, helpful staff and engaging, practical classes. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with the educational system and class organization.
With a 4.19/5 rating from 42 reviews, approximately 86% highlight positive aspects like university development, program quality, and organized processes. A small ~5% of feedback points to issues with administrative errors and a perceived lack of student immersion.
Most reviews are positive (~75%), highlighting flexibility for work-study balance and personal/professional growth, particularly in the nursing program. Some negative feedback exists (~25%), citing disorganization and a focus on profit.
As a current master's student in the Communication Management program at the University of Wroclaw, I can confidently say that this journey has been one of the most enriching experiences of my life, not only academically, but also personally and professionally. 1. Global opportunities through Erasmus+: During my time here, I’ve joined two short-term BIP exchange programs in Spain and Romania (with a generous grant), and have a one-year exchange in Germany. These experiences have allowed me to meet peers from across Europe, learn in diverse settings, and grow both culturally and intellectually. 2. Serious research, strong support: I’m currently representing our Institute in a Monography research project of UWr, a valuable opportunity to engage deeply with academic work and collaborate with professors in a meaningful way. The opportunity is open for all students who wanna pursue an academic path. 3. Supportive and passionate faculty: The professors are not only knowledgeable but also truly approachable. In the first semester, I approached my professor for guidance on career path, research opportunities, and expressed my interest. She shared insightful experiences, motivated and encouraged me a lot. And she nominated me for the Monography research project under her supervision, and I got the opportunity. I'm grateful, honestly. 4. Practice-oriented learning: Unlike many programs that are heavy on theory, this one focuses on real-world projects, case studies, and group work - ideal for master's-level students who want to build practical skills for the workplace. Actually, I don't face much study pressure, I enjoy the courses. 5. International Office that really cares: The International Office team is incredibly helpful. During the application process, I was surprised that they always responded to my email inquiries quickly and helped me resolve any issues. When I study here, from paperworks support to academic/exchange activities, they are always ready to assist and create a welcoming environment for students from all over the world. 6. Peaceful lifestyle & affordable living: Wroclaw is a charming, student-friendly city with a mix of history and modernity. The cost of living is reasonable, making it accessible for many international students without compromising on quality of life. I travelled to many cities in European countries, but Wroclaw is one of the most peaceful and affordable cities. Although the English skills of the city officers are limited, they always try to support by using Google Translate or finding support people. Studying at the University of Wroclaw has opened doors I never imagined: from international networks to research, from personal growth to professional clarity. If you're looking for an educational experience that truly takes you beyond the classroom, this could be your next big step. I appreciate this experience and believe that this is a worthy step to open up many opportunities to explore the world!
Nothing to show
After 2 academic years at GUT, I can say with confidence that I have really enjoyed my time in here! Starting from classes/lectures and integration events to the location of the University, I have been satisfied mostly about everything. I could see that GUT had a very high reputation in terms of labor market for businesses, where representatives of companies and big corporations come to look for new candidates for their organizations by organising job fairs, lectures etc. For example, I had a chance to take part in such a lecture arranged by State Street Bank representatives and passed tests organised later on. As a result, several students and I were granted a summer internship, after which most of us including me continued working there. So, in terms of finding a job while still being a student GUT is highly recommended as most of the professors are flexible when it comes to attendance. Additionally, you can easily integrate by joining Erasmus ;) they always have something planned like party, meetings, games, trips etc. I have met many interesting people/brains/personalities/characters and made many friends. So, I have no regrets at all choosing GUT as a university for my Master's degree! I would make the same choice if I had to choose again ;)
I was an international student at the University of Lodz in Poland. I am very happy that I choose this university for my masters studies. May be for some one its not but the overall discipline is appreciable.
The university is well organised and both professors and staff are helpful and friendly. The university is located in northern part of Poland. Which is near to the sea. The city is very beautiful. But some polish people don’t like foreigners.
The art studios are equipped with the necessary tools and materials for creative expression. The school auditorium hosts various cultural events and performances, providing a platform for students to showcase their talents.
If you have the option to study in Poland, then do not enroll in this school. This school has been a pain for many international students. They are an unorganized institution, and I do not even want to start explaining why they are already on the probationary list with the Polish government. Instead of providing higher education services to students, they tend to focus more on earning money from them rather than delivering high-quality education. You would be better off studying at other universities instead of this one. They have changed their name; it is now Powiślańska Akademia Nauk Stosowanych.
