University of Wroclaw - UWr vs Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR vs Wroclaw University of Economics vs University of Lodz - UL vs Medical University of Lodz - UMED
Side-by-side comparison from 201 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality education with knowledgeable and supportive professors.
- +Welcoming international environment and vibrant student life in a beautiful city.
- +Practical learning and career-focused programs.
- +High-quality teaching and respected professors
- +Engaging academic content and insightful thinkers
- +Well-organized courses and prepared materials
- +Competent and approachable faculty
- +Numerous internship and professional development opportunities
- +Excellent campus facilities and resources
- +High-quality education with excellent, approachable professors and a supportive atmosphere.
- +Diverse, international, and social environment with many opportunities.
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a positive urban setting.
- +Strong theoretical foundations and well-prepared medical courses
- +Good communication and supportive teachers with small group learning
- +Opportunities for extracurricular activities and an English-language program
- +Supportive and experienced professors
- +Abundant student activities and communities
- +Strong academic programs and practical application
- +Helpful, knowledgeable professors and opportunities for professional development.
- +Creative, flexible courses and space for self-expression.
- +Modern campus with collaborative study spaces.
- -Outdated and irrelevant course content, especially for English Philology majors.
- -Lack of promised opportunities outside of specific career paths like translation or business.
- -Severely underfunded facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disliked.
- -Lack of resources, including technology and learning materials, is a significant complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of effective teaching and support from instructors.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of efficient management.
- -Outdated or poorly maintained facilities and resources.
- -Unengaging curriculum and ineffective teaching methods.
- -Outdated study programs and irrelevant content.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment, particularly in labs.
- -Lack of professor guidance and student support in task completion.
- -Limited career opportunities and reliance on connections for jobs.
- -Poor communication and late information dissemination.
- -Unsatisfactory program quality and perceived lack of learning.
Overall, this institution garners favorable reviews across multiple aspects. The university excels in **Location**, receiving its highest score, suggesting it's a significant draw. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out with strong ratings. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest score, indicating this area could be improved. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality also maintain solid, above-average evaluations.
Across all surveyed categories, the university has received consistent ratings of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The uniform scores suggest a lack of significant positive or negative attributes in any area evaluated.
A commendable overall profile emerges from these university ratings. The location stands out as a clear strength with an impressive 4.75 score. Areas such as student life and professors also score highly at 4. Conversely, internationality presents the weakest area at 3.5, with facilities and accommodation receiving solid but slightly lower scores of 3.75. The university also scores well in value, indicating a positive return for students.
This institution garners strong ratings across several key areas. Location and value are particularly well-regarded, achieving scores over 4.2. Internationality and professors also score highly, exceeding 4.1. While student life and accommodation are rated positively, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories.
This institution garners strong reviews, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a score of 4.67, and **Student Life** at 4.5. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value are consistently high, all around 4.33. The lowest rated aspect, though still solid, is **Location** at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and positively regarded experience for its students.
This institution demonstrates a strong appeal in its location, receiving a high rating of 4.4. Internationality also scores well at 4.2, alongside a robust student life at 4.0. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, rated at 3.5, which is the lowest score. Facilities and professors both earned solid marks of 3.8, contributing to an overall favorable impression, with value sitting at a respectable 3.9.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its internationality, scoring a high 4.17. Location also received a solid 4. Areas for improvement are accommodation, with the lowest rating of 2.6, and facilities and value, both scoring 3.33. Professors and student life are rated moderately well, at 3.83 and 3.5 respectively.
University of Wrocław reviews are highly positive, averaging 4.36/5 based on 75 submissions. Students praise high-quality education, experienced professors, modern facilities, and a welcoming international community. A small amount of negative feedback (~4%) cites program structure and perceived lack of opportunities.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent professors and high-quality content, though some note outdated management and poor funding.
With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~75% of feedback is positive, highlighting well-organized faculty, competent lecturers, and valuable internship opportunities. There are no negative reviews.
With a 4.13/5 average rating from 98 reviews, ~94% are positive, highlighting a high-quality education, supportive academic staff, and a social, dynamic city. No negative feedback was received.
With ~83% positive sentiment (4-5 stars), reviewers highlight good teaching, communication, and opportunities for learning and student life. A small portion (~17%) found the study program outdated and some material unhelpful.
~70% of reviews are positive, highlighting qualified and passionate professors, numerous student activities, and a pleasant atmosphere. ~20% mention outdated equipment and a lack of guidance or opportunities for development.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, highlighting helpful professors and professional development opportunities. Some feedback (~17%) notes difficulties with communication and administrative processes.
As a current master's student in the Communication Management program at the University of Wroclaw, I can confidently say that this journey has been one of the most enriching experiences of my life, not only academically, but also personally and professionally. 1. Global opportunities through Erasmus+: During my time here, I’ve joined two short-term BIP exchange programs in Spain and Romania (with a generous grant), and have a one-year exchange in Germany. These experiences have allowed me to meet peers from across Europe, learn in diverse settings, and grow both culturally and intellectually. 2. Serious research, strong support: I’m currently representing our Institute in a Monography research project of UWr, a valuable opportunity to engage deeply with academic work and collaborate with professors in a meaningful way. The opportunity is open for all students who wanna pursue an academic path. 3. Supportive and passionate faculty: The professors are not only knowledgeable but also truly approachable. In the first semester, I approached my professor for guidance on career path, research opportunities, and expressed my interest. She shared insightful experiences, motivated and encouraged me a lot. And she nominated me for the Monography research project under her supervision, and I got the opportunity. I'm grateful, honestly. 4. Practice-oriented learning: Unlike many programs that are heavy on theory, this one focuses on real-world projects, case studies, and group work - ideal for master's-level students who want to build practical skills for the workplace. Actually, I don't face much study pressure, I enjoy the courses. 5. International Office that really cares: The International Office team is incredibly helpful. During the application process, I was surprised that they always responded to my email inquiries quickly and helped me resolve any issues. When I study here, from paperworks support to academic/exchange activities, they are always ready to assist and create a welcoming environment for students from all over the world. 6. Peaceful lifestyle & affordable living: Wroclaw is a charming, student-friendly city with a mix of history and modernity. The cost of living is reasonable, making it accessible for many international students without compromising on quality of life. I travelled to many cities in European countries, but Wroclaw is one of the most peaceful and affordable cities. Although the English skills of the city officers are limited, they always try to support by using Google Translate or finding support people. Studying at the University of Wroclaw has opened doors I never imagined: from international networks to research, from personal growth to professional clarity. If you're looking for an educational experience that truly takes you beyond the classroom, this could be your next big step. I appreciate this experience and believe that this is a worthy step to open up many opportunities to explore the world!
I have found great thinkers among both students and lecturers. I have enjoyed some courses more than I took pleasure in others, but that is solely due to my increased interest and the preference I hold for theory, especially social and cultural, whereby my greatest pleasure must have been meeting and partaking in classes held by professor Slawomir Kapralski whom I hold in highest respect. The classes are well-ordered and organized, the material is prepared and provided, the professors are attentive, kind and prompt in their correspondence - no less is the case when it comes to the correspondence one seeks in the support that the dean or the rest of the faculty staff will be willing to provide.
Nothing to show
I was an international student at the University of Lodz in Poland. I am very happy that I choose this university for my masters studies. May be for some one its not but the overall discipline is appreciable.
Nothing to show
What I like about my university and faculty is that I have a lot of possibilities to work on my development. I will meet here a lot of people from different countries and develop my social and soft skills, which are very important, for example in our future job. I cannot say a lot about my faculty yet, because I am here only for a few weeks, but I have very high hopes that it will be a well-spent time!
Nothing to show
