Wroclaw University of Science and Technology - PWR vs University of Wroclaw - UWr vs WSB University - WSB vs Kozminski University vs University of Lodz - UL
Side-by-side comparison from 286 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive faculty and modern facilities
- +Practical learning and career readiness
- +Vibrant student life and engaging activities
- +High-quality education and excellent professors
- +Valuable practical experience and research opportunities
- +Enjoyable student life in a beautiful city
- +Practical, career-focused programmes with real-world skills
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers and staff
- +Flexible learning formats and opportunities for personal development
- +Expert and approachable faculty with practical industry experience.
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a vibrant, diverse campus life.
- +Strong academic programs focused on practical knowledge and professional development.
- +High-quality education with excellent, approachable professors and a supportive atmosphere.
- +Diverse, international, and social environment with many opportunities.
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a positive urban setting.
- +Supportive and knowledgeable staff
- +Relevant and comprehensive curriculum
- +Opportunities for practical experience
- +Attentive, knowledgeable teachers and practical, job-market focused learning
- +Welcoming, multicultural environment and supportive student systems
- +Modern campus facilities and flexible learning options
- -Administrative burdens and frequent rule changes cause student frustration.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaged professors are a significant issue.
- -Outdated facilities and underfunding are a significant issue.
- -Course content is often irrelevant for students with a relevant BA.
- -Program lacks promised opportunities beyond specific career paths.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and resources
- -Lack of practical application and career support
- -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of efficient management.
- -Outdated or poorly maintained facilities and resources.
- -Unengaging curriculum and ineffective teaching methods.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently cited.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders academic success.
- -Minimal learning and easy passing requirements.
This university receives high marks, particularly excelling in its **Location**, which scored a near-perfect 4.72. Other strong areas include **Value** (4.5) and **Facilities** (4.47). Student feedback indicates a generally positive experience across **Professors** (4.36) and **Student Life** (4.31). **Accomodation** (4.14) is also well-regarded, though slightly lower. The area with the most room for improvement appears to be **Internationality**, rated at 4.03.
This university garners strong feedback across several key areas. The location stands out as the highest-rated aspect, achieving a score of 4.8. Professors also received excellent marks, with a rating of 4.45. Accommodation represents the lowest score among the surveyed categories at 4.01. Overall, student life, facilities, and internationality also received favorable ratings between 4.1 and 4.2.
This university scores highly in several key areas, with location and internationality being particularly strong points. Student life and accommodation received the lowest ratings among the surveyed categories. Facilities and value for money are also well-regarded, while professors are rated favorably as well.
Overall, this institution garners impressive scores in multiple facets. Its strongest areas are Professors and Internationality, both receiving a near-perfect 4.57. Facilities are also highly regarded at 4.51. The weakest, though still solid, is Location, with a rating of 4.08.
This institution garners strong ratings across several key areas. Location and value are particularly well-regarded, achieving scores over 4.2. Internationality and professors also score highly, exceeding 4.1. While student life and accommodation are rated positively, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories.
This institution generally receives strong reviews, with particularly high marks for **Facilities, Professors, Location,** and **Student Life**, all scoring an impressive 4.25. **Value** stands out as its strongest area, achieving a near-perfect 4.75. The university's **Internationality** is its weakest point, receiving a 3.5 rating, while **Accomodation** also received a slightly lower score of 4.
With impressive scores across most areas, the university excels in its **Facilities**, boasting a 4.6 rating. **Professors** also received a strong 4.0. The **Accomodation** category, however, stands out as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.4. Other areas like Student Life and Value are rated moderately at 3.8.
With a 4.46/5 average rating, ~97% of reviews are positive, praising modern facilities, supportive lecturers, and job prospects. One review criticized administrative formalities and inconsistent teaching quality.
With a 4.37/5 average, ~96% of reviews are positive, praising high-quality education, engaged professors, practical opportunities, and the city. A small percentage (~4%) mention disappointment with specific course content and limited opportunities in some programs.
With an average rating of 4/5 based on 11 reviews, ~73% of feedback is positive. Students highlight practical, student-friendly learning environments, approachable lecturers, and opportunities for personal development and internships. No negative feedback was reported.
Nearly all students praise the university's excellent academics, highly qualified and approachable professors, and modern facilities. The strong focus on practical knowledge and professional development, along with a vibrant international environment, are key highlights. No negative feedback was reported.
With a 4.13/5 average rating from 98 reviews, ~94% are positive, highlighting a high-quality education, supportive academic staff, and a social, dynamic city. No negative feedback was received.
Four reviews show a 100% positive sentiment, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Recurring positive themes include helpful and supportive staff/lecturers, informative courses, and opportunities to pursue passions.
With a 4/5 average rating, approximately 80% of reviews are positive, highlighting enjoyable lectures, knowledgeable professors, a modern and visually appealing campus, and a supportive, multicultural environment. Around 20% of feedback mentions a negligible passing barrier and minimal academic rigor.
Nothing to show
As a current master's student in the Communication Management program at the University of Wroclaw, I can confidently say that this journey has been one of the most enriching experiences of my life, not only academically, but also personally and professionally. 1. Global opportunities through Erasmus+: During my time here, I’ve joined two short-term BIP exchange programs in Spain and Romania (with a generous grant), and have a one-year exchange in Germany. These experiences have allowed me to meet peers from across Europe, learn in diverse settings, and grow both culturally and intellectually. 2. Serious research, strong support: I’m currently representing our Institute in a Monography research project of UWr, a valuable opportunity to engage deeply with academic work and collaborate with professors in a meaningful way. The opportunity is open for all students who wanna pursue an academic path. 3. Supportive and passionate faculty: The professors are not only knowledgeable but also truly approachable. In the first semester, I approached my professor for guidance on career path, research opportunities, and expressed my interest. She shared insightful experiences, motivated and encouraged me a lot. And she nominated me for the Monography research project under her supervision, and I got the opportunity. I'm grateful, honestly. 4. Practice-oriented learning: Unlike many programs that are heavy on theory, this one focuses on real-world projects, case studies, and group work - ideal for master's-level students who want to build practical skills for the workplace. Actually, I don't face much study pressure, I enjoy the courses. 5. International Office that really cares: The International Office team is incredibly helpful. During the application process, I was surprised that they always responded to my email inquiries quickly and helped me resolve any issues. When I study here, from paperworks support to academic/exchange activities, they are always ready to assist and create a welcoming environment for students from all over the world. 6. Peaceful lifestyle & affordable living: Wroclaw is a charming, student-friendly city with a mix of history and modernity. The cost of living is reasonable, making it accessible for many international students without compromising on quality of life. I travelled to many cities in European countries, but Wroclaw is one of the most peaceful and affordable cities. Although the English skills of the city officers are limited, they always try to support by using Google Translate or finding support people. Studying at the University of Wroclaw has opened doors I never imagined: from international networks to research, from personal growth to professional clarity. If you're looking for an educational experience that truly takes you beyond the classroom, this could be your next big step. I appreciate this experience and believe that this is a worthy step to open up many opportunities to explore the world!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I was an international student at the University of Lodz in Poland. I am very happy that I choose this university for my masters studies. May be for some one its not but the overall discipline is appreciable.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
