American University of Armenia - AUA vs University of Tuzla - UNTZ vs European University Kallos Tuzla - EU Kallos Tuzla vs International Business Information Academy - IPIA vs Université Saint-Joseph de Beyrouth - USJ

Side-by-side comparison from 119 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: International Business Information Academy - IPIA (5.00)
American University of Armenia - AUA: wins 0/5 categories
University of Tuzla - UNTZ: wins 0/5 categories
European University Kallos Tuzla - EU Kallos Tuzla: wins 0/5 categories
International Business Information Academy - IPIA: wins 5/5 categories
Université Saint-Joseph de Beyrouth - USJ: wins 0/5 categories
National Institute and School of Applied Sciences of Centre Loire Valley - INSA: wins 0/5 categories
Institut Supérieur de Formation Sociale et de Communication - ISFSC: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
3.50
Read more reviews
101 reviews
×
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Information Technology
Best programme: Food Nutrition and Dietetics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
3.13
Not rated
4.00
3.33
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.50
4.01
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Professors
4.25
4.02
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.67
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
4.00
3.15
Not rated
5.00
3.33
Not rated
5.00
Student life
4.25
3.60
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Value
4.25
3.68
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.33
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
4.00
3.28
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.67
Not rated
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive learning environment with inspiring, diverse peers and helpful faculty.
  • +High-quality, practical curriculum offering valuable real-world experience.
  • +Positive campus atmosphere and central location in Yerevan.
  • +High-quality, professional, and helpful professors
  • +Good educational programs fulfilling expectations
  • +Supportive environment and career prospects
  • +Friendly and accessible professors
  • +Good learning opportunities
  • +Modern facilities and location
  • +Quality education with supportive staff and professors
  • +Modern and well-equipped facilities and classrooms
  • +High-quality education and excellent teachers
  • +Well-equipped facilities and organized programs
  • +Strong reputation and career prospects

Nothing to show

  • +Hands-on learning with industry professional professors
  • +Wide variety of practical projects and career exploration opportunities
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and personal touch
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of resources and support impacts student success.
  • -Administrative and organizational issues are pervasive.
  • -Lack of practical application and outdated facilities are significant problems.
  • -Some professors exhibit poor teaching methods and rudeness.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff leave students feeling neglected.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant, lacking practical application and depth.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including perceived dishonesty and unhelpfulness.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring concern.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and a lack of clear communication cause frustration.
  • -Students feel a disconnect with faculty and a lack of support.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners strong praise across multiple aspects, with its location particularly standing out at a 4.5 rating. Professors, student life, and value also received solid scores of 4.25. Facilities and accommodation were rated a respectable 4, while internationality also achieved a 4. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering, with its prime location being its most significant asset.

Regarding university performance, professors and location stand out as the strongest aspects, both receiving ratings around 4.0. Student life and value are also well-regarded, scoring above 3.5. Areas for potential improvement include facilities, accommodation, and internationality, which are rated in the low 3s. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid but varied performance across these key metrics.

This academic institution received consistently low ratings across all surveyed categories. Areas like facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all scored zero. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or weaknesses to highlight, as the university appears to perform poorly across the board according to this assessment.

This institution demonstrates outstanding performance, achieving a perfect score in Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. Its strongest areas are clearly these aspects, reflecting a highly positive student experience and excellent offerings. The Facilities rating, while still very good at 4, represents the only slight area for potential improvement within an otherwise exceptional overall assessment.

The university presents a mixed profile, with its strongest rating in **Location** at 4. Areas of good performance include **Professors** and **Accomodation**, both scoring 3.67. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest rating at 3.0. Facilities, Internationality, and Value all fall in the mid-range with scores around 3.33.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates particular strength in its international student experience, earning a perfect score. Other highly rated aspects include its facilities, professors, and overall value, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Conversely, accommodation is identified as the weakest area, with a score of 2. The university also shows moderate performance in location and student life.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.3/5 average rating from 10 reviews, ~90% are positive. Students praise the supportive environment, knowledgeable professors, and international atmosphere. Little negative feedback was noted.

Around 46% of reviews are positive, praising high-quality staff and curriculum, with some noting occasional subjective grading. About 17% are negative, citing poor organization and lack of practical application. The average rating is 3.49/5.

With an average rating of 4.33/5 based on 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the modern design, great location, and the kindness and professionalism of professors and staff. Some suggest improvements for certain faculties regarding curriculum and practical experience.

The sole review is highly positive, awarding 5 out of 5 stars. Students praise the quality education, supportive professors, and modern, well-equipped facilities. No negative feedback was recorded.

University reviews are mostly positive, with 2 out of 3 (about 67%) giving high ratings. Students praised the high level of education and well-equipped facilities. One review (about 33%) expressed dissatisfaction, citing concerns about the university's focus on money over students and inconsistent support.

Nothing to show

The sole review was positive, rating the university 4 out of 5 stars. This feedback highlights appreciation for practical courses, industry-professional instructors, and diverse projects. The atmosphere was described as welcoming and supportive.

Rating distribution
5★
40%
23%
33%
100%
33%
0%
0%
4★
50%
23%
67%
0%
33%
0%
100%
3★
10%
38%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
14%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
1★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

A waste of money

The price for the master's is insanely expensive considering what it has to offer. I got an MA in translation and interpreting, but sadly, my colleagues and I barely had any practical exercises in these subjects. Most of the professors were alright though. Bearing in mind where they work, most of them try to do their best. The university is politicized, since the politicians play with it like with ping-pong balls. The only aim is to employ their own people, no matter how incompetent they are, instead of the people who are actually able to do proper work. Anyone in their right mind (since I was not one of those people) will opt to study abroad and obtain the MA degree somewhere else. I paid 2500 KM so I can have a degree from an XY rated university, instead of studying in, say, Germany or Austria, where the prices are identical, or even lower, and where students can also get real scholarships if they're good enough. Once again, a waste of money. If only they (politicians) invested all that money in infrastructure and better equipment, the university would be a much nicer place and the main Uni building would not have 40 YO doors and windows.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Medical Laboratory School is recommended

I spent 3 years at USJ in the faculty of pharmacy, school of medical analysis laboratory technicians (ETLAM). The school was well organized, the lessons very clear with excellent teachers and access to the university's laboratories, which were also well equipped. I recommend those who wish to work as clinical laboratory technicians to continue their studies at USJ. The lessons are given in French, but we also had English lessons to improve our skills in this language. Student life at USJ is friendly, that said, it is necessary to pay attention to the fact that the timetable is decided beforehand, the student cannot choose his own schedule as in other universities in Lebanon.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close