Universidad de Burgos vs Maseno University vs The Kisumu National Polytechnic - TKNP vs Great Lakes University of Kisumu - GLUK vs Maasai Mara University

Side-by-side comparison from 121 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad de Burgos: wins 0/5 categories
Maseno University: wins 2/5 categories
The Kisumu National Polytechnic - TKNP: wins 1/5 categories
Great Lakes University of Kisumu - GLUK: wins 0/5 categories
Maasai Mara University: wins 0/5 categories
Tom Mboya University: wins 0/5 categories
Faculty of Higher Studies Iztacala - FESI: wins 2/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: History and Human Evolution
kisumu, Kenya
4.50
Read more reviews
86 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: 3D Design
Best programme: Applied Statistics
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Ecology
Category ratings
Facilities
3.57
4.14
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.88
Not rated
4.00
Location
3.47
4.31
4.50
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
2.00
Professors
3.86
4.49
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.25
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
3.21
3.97
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.63
Not rated
2.00
Student life
3.67
4.21
4.00
Not rated
3.75
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
3.48
4.53
4.50
Not rated
4.38
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.21
3.98
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive teachers and academic programs
  • +Accessible and helpful staff
  • +Positive campus environment and resources
  • +Strong academic environment and practical learning focus
  • +Supportive atmosphere with approachable, passionate instructors
  • +Well-structured programmes with engaging teaching methods
  • +Practical, hands-on learning and career-oriented education
  • +Dedicated lecturers and supportive learning environment
  • +Development of essential soft skills and overall personal growth

Nothing to show

  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Holistic learning and diverse activities
  • +Quality education and modern facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Professional and capable professors
  • +Improved curriculum and student development focus
  • +Adequate facilities
Cons
  • -Poor communication and a lack of transparency from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Overcrowded classes and a lack of personalized attention.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Limited communication and transparency from the institution.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Inconsistent and unfair grading policies.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative support.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are common complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor management are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum is often described as rigid, uninspiring, and not relevant to current needs.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university garners a generally positive reception. Professors receive the highest marks, indicating a strong academic environment. Conversely, accommodation is rated lowest, suggesting this area could benefit from improvement. Other aspects like facilities, student life, location, internationality, and value fall within a moderate range, reflecting a generally satisfactory, yet not exceptional, experience across these facets.

Overall, this university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in the value of education, with a rating of 4.53. Professors also receive high marks at 4.49, alongside a positive student life experience at 4.21. The weakest areas appear to be accommodation and internationality, both scoring just under 4.0. Facilities and location also received solid, though not outstanding, scores.

This institution garners consistently high marks, with its **location** and **internationality** standing out as its strongest attributes at 4.5. Its **value for money** also received a top score of 4.5. Other aspects, including **facilities**, **professors**, **student life**, and **accommodation**, are all rated a solid 4, indicating a well-rounded and positive university experience across the board.

Nothing to show

The university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Location** (4.5) and **Value** (4.375), alongside an impressive score for **Professors** (4.25). **Student Life** and **Accomodation** also received favorable marks. The **Internationality** aspect, however, registers as the lowest rated area at 3.625, with **Facilities** also performing slightly below average at 3.875.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in student life and perceived value, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, its location and internationality are noted as weaker aspects, earning just two out of five points. Facilities and professors are rated positively at a solid four, while accommodation falls in the middle with a three.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 3.96 average rating from 24 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight comprehensive programs, caring teachers, and a supportive learning environment.

With ~93% of 86 reviews being positive, students praise the university's supportive atmosphere, practical learning, and well-structured programs. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, these 2 reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight excellent communication, teamwork, dedication, love for education, and the quality of courses and lecturers. Practical learning and supportive lecturers preparing students for real-world situations are also praised.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~88% of reviewers are positive. Students commend dedicated lecturers, quality education, and a holistic learning environment. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

With one review, the university received a 4/5 average rating. The feedback was ~100% positive, highlighting professional professors and an improved curriculum. Facilities were adequate, though some material shortages were noted.

Rating distribution
5★
13%
60%
50%
0%
63%
0%
0%
4★
71%
31%
50%
0%
25%
0%
100%
3★
17%
8%
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nice place to be

I enjoyed learning at the university. The lectures were nice and students were nice to everyone, I found it easier to interact with everyone at school. However, life was tough in general due to lack of enough funds to support my student upkeep. But I recommend the school to anyone

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close