Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University - TSU vs Caucasus University - CIU vs Ilia State University - ISU vs Georgian Technical University - GTU vs Alte University
Side-by-side comparison from 42 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Valued knowledge and practical experience gained.
- +Appreciated knowledgeable and supportive professors and academic environment.
- +Enjoyed diverse student community and engaging student life.
- +Comprehensive business programs
- +Experienced, professional tutors
- +Modern facilities
- +Internationally recognized curriculum and knowledgeable, supportive professors.
- +Welcoming atmosphere and helpful community.
- +Opportunities for personal growth and active participation.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Engaging and relevant curriculum
- +Supportive and friendly professors
- +Strong theoretical and practical foundation
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning experiences.
- -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Financial focus over educational quality
- -Poor instructor qualifications
- -Lack of student well-being consideration
- -Inadequate practical experience and reliance on theory.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and outdated assessment styles.
- -Limited support for internships and real-world application.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Poor administrative and management issues, including unclear communication and disorganized processes.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources impact the learning environment.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and insufficient support for student needs are frustrating.
Nothing to show
This institution receives a mixed but generally positive review, with its strongest performances in **Professors** (4.38) and **Location** (4.25). **Value** also scores well at 4.14. The weakest areas, requiring attention, are **Facilities** at 3 and **Student Life** at 3.57. Accommodation and Internationality fall within the mid-range of ratings.
Assessments reveal a university with notable strengths in its **facilities**, which received a high rating. Conversely, **accommodation** emerged as the lowest-rated aspect, with **location** and **student life** also scoring below average. Other areas, including professors, internationality, and value, received moderate to good reviews, suggesting a mixed but generally solid experience, with notable room for improvement in practical student support and campus environment.
With location being the standout positive, this university also received strong marks for its professors and value. Student life, facilities, and internationality were rated moderately. The weakest area identified in the survey was accommodation. Overall, the university presents a mixed but generally favorable picture, with clear strengths and one notable area for improvement.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Academic strengths shine through, with professors receiving a perfect score of 5. The university also scores well in value, earning a 4. However, areas requiring improvement include location and accommodation, both rated a low 2. Facilities and student life received moderate scores of 3, as did internationality.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.3/5 from 23 reviews, ~91% express satisfaction. Students highly value the knowledge gained, positive learning experiences, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. No negative feedback was reported.
~57% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong business programs and experienced lecturers. ~14% of feedback is negative, primarily concerning financial focus and instructor qualifications. The average rating is 3.43/5.
Approximately 64% of reviews are positive, highlighting competent professors, a good educational process, and a positive atmosphere. The average rating is 3.91/5, with about 9% of feedback being negative and mentioning theory-based education without practical projects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The sole review is highly positive, with ~100% of feedback being favorable. Students highlight excellent courses, friendly professors, and engaging subjects.
Nothing to show
The university offers a basic education with standard facilities. The classrooms, labs, and libraries are functional but not impressive. The teachers are experienced and provide solid instruction, though there isn’t much advanced research or unique insight. Students get a good foundation in medical basics, but the university doesn’t have special programs or standout features. Clinical training is limited, and students may miss out on specialized rotations or advanced practices. Support services like academic advising and career counseling are not available. Campus life is average, with typical student activities and organizations. Overall, the university provides a reliable, straightforward education. It’s a good choice for those looking for a dependable path to becoming a healthcare professional without extra features or exceptional opportunities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
GIPA offers one of the best, if not the best, IR courses in the whole country. In my first year, I used to think that it was not anything special, but over time, I realized how important everything we learn is. The professors are really friendly and they are always on the students' side. The subjects that the course offers are very interesting and engaging, all of them give you the theoretical and practical bases to further develop your critical thinking. The only negative thing about this course is that the campus is very far away from the city center.
Nothing to show