Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena vs University of Amsterdam - UvA vs Universidad Experimental de Guayana - UNEG vs University of Dubai - UD vs Instituto Universitario de Tecnología Industrial Rodolfo Loero Arismendi
Side-by-side comparison from 181 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive professors and inclusive environment
- +Abundant resources and welcoming atmosphere
- +Excellent location and appealing surroundings
- +Approachable and supportive professors
- +Well-designed, up-to-date curriculum and academic programs
- +Good student support and facilities
- +High-quality teaching and career programs
- +Positive campus environment and student experience
- +Opportunities for personal growth and new adventures
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Terrible teachers and lack of continuous evaluation.
- -Few electives and limited specialization options.
- -Limited Erasmus destinations and few international students.
- -Lack of student support and care.
- -Poor program value and teaching effectiveness.
- -Administrative and communication issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and feedback creates confusion.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Rankings for this institution reveal a mixed bag of strengths and weaknesses. The university excels in its **location** and **value for money**, both receiving a strong 4.5 rating. **Student life** and **internationality** also score well at 3.75. However, **professors** emerge as the weakest area with a rating of 2.5, while **facilities** are rated moderately at 3.25. **Accommodations** are a solid performer at 4.
A mixed performance is evident across the surveyed categories. The university excels in **Location** (4.59) and **Internationality** (4.49), with **Facilities** (4.27) also receiving high marks. **Professors** (4.11) and **Student Life** (4.07) are rated favorably, as is **Value** (4.07). However, **Accomodation** stands out as a significantly weaker area, scoring considerably lower than other aspects.
This institution demonstrates strengths in its teaching quality and geographic positioning, both receiving a strong 4 out of 5. However, its facilities and student life offerings are areas for improvement, each scoring a lower 2.5. Accommodations and its international profile are moderately rated at 3 and 3.5 respectively, with value for money also reflecting a decent 3.5.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3.92/5, ~85% of reviews are positive, highlighting ease of integration, professor professionalism, and good facilities. A small portion (~7.7%) of feedback notes poor teaching and limited course offerings.
~96% of 179 reviews are positive, highlighting good quality education, approachable professors, and improving courses. A small fraction of feedback mentions issues with program value and student support.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 and 0% negative feedback, 100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight opportunities to study desired careers and excellent teaching programs, despite some mentioning a need for better facilities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The costs for EU students are ok. Housing is still crazy and you are lucky if you get assistance with that, but when you do, it's very good for the money. The classes are a bit big but we manage. I feel the curriculum is complete and up to date and theres nothing missing from my education
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
