Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena vs Universidad del Rosario - UROSARIO vs The Northcap University - NCU vs University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene - USTHB vs City University of Applied Sciences

Side-by-side comparison from 49 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: City of Glasgow College - COGC (5.00)
Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad del Rosario - UROSARIO: wins 1/7 categories
The Northcap University - NCU: wins 0/7 categories
University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene - USTHB: wins 0/7 categories
City University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/7 categories
Patliputra University: wins 0/7 categories
City of Glasgow College - COGC: wins 5/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Aerospace Engineering
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Glasgow, The United Kingdom
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Social Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
3.98
4.50
3.60
4.23
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
4.50
3.95
4.00
4.60
3.97
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
2.50
4.52
4.50
3.40
3.43
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.75
4.29
Win
2.50
3.60
2.93
Not rated
4.00
Student life
3.75
4.44
4.00
3.80
3.77
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.50
Win
4.33
4.00
4.00
4.27
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
4.00
3.80
4.00
3.40
4.17
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive professors and inclusive environment
  • +Abundant resources and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Excellent location and appealing surroundings
  • +Innovative programs with practical application and real-world projects
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors dedicated to student growth
  • +Comprehensive and ethical education fostering personal and professional development
  • +Practical, industry-focused learning and critical thinking encouragement
  • +Well-equipped labs and industry projects
  • +Enriching academic experience and strong technical foundation
  • +Highly knowledgeable and passionate professors
  • +Large campus with modern facilities and diverse programs
  • +Friendly, collaborative, and supportive student community
  • +Strong international connections and global interaction opportunities
  • +Diverse and interesting study programs with uncrowded lectures
  • +Accessible city center location with industry relevance

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive staff and positive environment
  • +Enjoyable overall experience
Cons
  • -Terrible teachers and lack of continuous evaluation.
  • -Few electives and limited specialization options.
  • -Limited Erasmus destinations and few international students.
  • -Inefficient administrative and communication issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor quality of teaching and curriculum development is a significant concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
  • -Unclear communication and administrative inefficiencies
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources
  • -Lack of student support and engagement

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

Rankings for this institution reveal a mixed bag of strengths and weaknesses. The university excels in its **location** and **value for money**, both receiving a strong 4.5 rating. **Student life** and **internationality** also score well at 3.75. However, **professors** emerge as the weakest area with a rating of 2.5, while **facilities** are rated moderately at 3.25. **Accommodations** are a solid performer at 4.

An overview of the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. Professors and student life emerge as the strongest areas, both receiving high marks. Internationality and value are also rated very favorably. Facilities, location, and accommodation, while still respectable, represent the weaker aspects of the university's offerings, scoring lower than other categories.

This institution scores highly across several key metrics, with particular strengths in its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both receiving 4.5 stars. **Location**, **Student Life**, **Accommodation**, and **Value** all garnered a solid 4 stars. The standout area for improvement is **Internationality**, which received a lower score of 2.5 stars, suggesting this is the weakest aspect of the university's offerings.

The university shines in its **location**, receiving an outstanding 4.6. Its **value** is also a significant strength, scoring a perfect 4. Conversely, the **professors** and **accommodation** are areas for improvement, both rated at 3.4. Other aspects like facilities and student life fall within a moderate range.

This university's strengths lie in its exceptional Facilities (4.23) and impressive Value (4.27), with Accomodation (4.17) also scoring highly. Student Life (3.77) and Location (3.97) are rated positively, though less so than the top categories. The weakest area by a noticeable margin is Internationality, scoring 2.93, while Professors received a moderate rating of 3.43.

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent scores, excelling particularly in its facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect marks. While still strong, its internationality and perceived value are slightly lower at four out of five. Overall, it presents a highly positive academic and campus experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 3.92/5, ~85% of reviews are positive, highlighting ease of integration, professor professionalism, and good facilities. A small portion (~7.7%) of feedback notes poor teaching and limited course offerings.

With ~100% positive feedback and an average of 4.54/5 stars, reviews highlight an innovative and comprehensive education. Students appreciate knowledgeable professors, practical projects, and opportunities for growth and international experiences.

With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. One student highlighted enriching experiences, strong technical foundations, practical applications, and critical thinking encouragement. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a high proportion of positive feedback, reviewers describe an enriching and collaborative academic environment. Students appreciate knowledgeable professors, modern facilities, and diverse program options, though some noted unhelpful teachers.

With an average rating of 4.25/5 and ~0% negative feedback, university reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Recurring themes include strong international connections, convenient city center location, and well-organized, uncrowded lectures.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). Students praise supportive staff and lecturers, contributing to a generally positive college environment.

Rating distribution
5★
15%
58%
50%
0%
50%
0%
100%
4★
69%
38%
0%
80%
25%
0%
0%
3★
8%
4%
50%
20%
25%
0%
0%
2★
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close