Universidad Estatal de Sonora - UES vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Universidad Panamericana vs Astana Medical University vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 54 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Estatal de Sonora - UES (5.00)
Universidad Estatal de Sonora - UES: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 3/7 categories
Universidad Panamericana: wins 1/7 categories
Astana Medical University: wins 0/7 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Ironhack: wins 3/7 categories
Botswana International University of Science and Technology: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Communication
Aguascalientes, Mexico
4.10
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Medicine
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.50
4.33
2.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.50
Location
Not rated
4.50
4.25
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.25
Professors
Not rated
4.41
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Internationality
Not rated
4.59
Win
3.33
4.00
Not rated
3.00
3.75
Student life
Not rated
4.63
3.67
2.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.25
Value
Not rated
4.63
Win
4.33
4.00
Not rated
3.00
4.25
Accommodation
Not rated
4.66
Win
3.75
2.50
Not rated
4.00
3.25
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and facilitative teachers
  • +Relevant and practical curriculum
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities
  • +Highly qualified professors and academic excellence
  • +Strong business programs and professional connections
  • +Personalized attention and strong sense of community
  • +Few professors are truly passionate and knowledgeable
  • +Curriculum is demanding but has a gap between theory and practice
  • +Administrative processes are frustrating with unclear communication and schedule changes

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Supportive and friendly community
  • +Opportunities for academic and personal development
  • +High-quality facilities and engaging activities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant environment.
  • -Lack of essential resources and support hinders learning.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
  • -Intellectualism is perceived as cultish.
  • -Institutions are seen as unreliable sources of truth.
  • -There's a critique of seeking purpose through complex language and power.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are perceived as irrelevant or unengaging.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently mentioned.
  • -Lack of resources and inadequate course materials hinder learning.
Rating summary
What students say

This university presents a uniform rating across all surveyed categories, indicating no standout strengths or weaknesses. With identical scores of zero in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value, the institution appears to offer a consistent experience, though without any areas excelling or significantly underperforming according to these metrics.

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

The university is highly rated for its professors, achieving a strong 4.5. Facilities and value also score well, both at 4.33. Student life, while respectable at 3.67, and accommodation at 3.75 represent areas where ratings are somewhat lower. Internationality is rated the lowest among all categories at 3.33.

This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its faculty expertise and international student engagement, both receiving a notable 4 out of 5. Conversely, the facilities, student life, and accommodation offerings are areas with room for improvement, each scoring 2.5. The university's location and overall value also received mid-range assessments.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This institution garners praise for its **exceptional value**, with a score of 4.25. Professors also receive strong marks at 4.0. Areas for potential improvement include its **facilities and location**, both scoring 3.25. Student life and accommodation are also rated at this level, while internationality stands out at 3.75, suggesting a positive but not universally outstanding experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, ~100% of feedback is positive. The sole reviewer praised the great environment and facilitator-style teachers.

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

University students praise academic excellence, professor quality, and modern facilities. ~92% of feedback is positive, with one reviewer expressing concerns about intellectualism.

With one positive review and no negative feedback, sentiment leans positive (~50%). Students describe a demanding curriculum with some theory-practice gaps and outdated teaching methods. Administrative issues were also noted.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

With an average rating of 4.25/5, 3 out of 4 reviews are positive (~75%). Students highlight critical thinking, a supportive community, and opportunities for academic and personal development. No negative feedback was reported.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
67%
33%
0%
0%
50%
50%
4★
0%
39%
58%
50%
0%
0%
25%
3★
0%
3%
0%
50%
0%
0%
25%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close