Sofia university ST. Kliment Ohridski vs Technical University of Sofia – Branch Plovdiv vs New Bulgarian University - NBU vs Technical University of Sofia - TU vs HRC Culinary Academy
Side-by-side comparison from 71 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Quality education and academic programs
- +Supportive professors and staff
- +Active student life and professional development opportunities
- +Technical subject breadth, though some content is outdated.
- +Limited resources and outdated labs hinder scientific pursuits.
- +Supportive and professional faculty
- +Relevant and practical program content
- +Modern facilities and engaging learning environment
- +Unique international study opportunities and foreign university partnerships.
- +High-quality professors and subject matter expertise.
- +Broad range of specialized courses.
Nothing to show
- +Flexible and affordable remote education
- +Engaging and modern lectures by intelligent instructors
- +Job placement support and relevant skill development
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and workload management.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern educational tools.
- -Inconsistent professor quality and experience.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Ineffective administrative and management support.
- -Lack of engagement and relevance in curriculum.
- -Outdated curriculum and unproductive teaching methods.
- -Lack of sufficient instructors and support staff for large student numbers.
- -Unfulfilled program goals and wasted course content.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -Students express frustration with administrative inefficiencies and lack of support.
- -Course content is sometimes perceived as irrelevant or not aligned with current industry needs.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities and resources are outdated and insufficient.
- -Communication and student support are lacking.
Nothing to show
This institution performs notably well in Location, receiving its highest score. Student Life and Value are also areas of strength, both rated at 3.58. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area with a score of 2.63. Facilities and Internationality also received lower ratings, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects.
Across the surveyed categories, the university received uniformly low ratings. With zero marks in all areas, there are no standout strengths to highlight. The institution's performance is consistently weak across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. This suggests a need for significant improvement across all aspects of the university experience.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings, with high ratings for Professors (3.875) and Facilities (3.8125). Student life and internationalization also received positive scores. Conversely, the Location appears to be the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Accommodations and overall value present a moderate performance.
This institution excels in student life, achieving a high rating of 4.5. Professors and location also received strong scores of 4.25, alongside value for money. Conversely, facilities and internationality are the weakest areas, both scoring 3. The accommodation rating sits at a moderate 3.5, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in its academic offerings and global appeal, earning perfect scores for Professors and Value, and a very strong 4.5 for Internationality. Areas for improvement include its Facilities, which received a lower rating of 2.5. Student life and accommodation are moderately rated, while the location scores a respectable 3.5.
Nothing to show
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting quality education and student life. A small portion (~10%) of negative feedback mentions issues with pandemic handling and outdated facilities.
With one review, the university is rated 4/5 stars. This student highlighted the broad technical knowledge offered but noted limitations for aspiring scientists due to financing and outdated subjects.
Most of the 33 reviews are positive (~74%), highlighting supportive professors, modern facilities, and engaging programs. A small percentage (~6%) of negative feedback mentions outdated or unproductive courses and insufficient teaching staff for some programs.
With 3 out of 4 reviews being positive (~75%), students praise unique courses and international study opportunities. The average rating is 3.75/5, with no negative feedback reported.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, both reviews are positive. Students highlight comfortable, flexible, fully remote learning with affordable taxes and great education. Lectures are described as interesting and modern, taught by intelligent lecturers. The university also offers job placement assistance.
Nothing to show
The experience you can get as a student in Sofia University mainly depends on the major and Faculty that you are in. Also, on your motivation and how much do you want to invest in time and efforts to learn something. You can have the positive experience of being taught by very good and quality professors and assistant professors, or some that are not quite good at all, but this is something you can see and experience in any university what so ever. The bureaucracy is annoying for sure.
Nothing to show
The curriculum provides a comprehensive overview of various aspects within the specialty, making the degree highly attractive to employers in Bulgaria. Although challenging, pursuing their programs part-time can be more manageable. New Bulgarian University offers more hands-on experience, equipping students with specific skills relevant to the job market. The lecturers are also commendable, offering support and practical insights that make learning more applicable to real-world scenarios, enhancing both the academic and professional development of students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
