Polytechnic University Of the Philippines - PUP vs National University - NU vs Mapua University - MU vs STI Colleges vs Colegio de San Juan de Letran - CSJL
Side-by-side comparison from 73 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Passionate, experienced, and inspiring professors
- +Affordable and practical education
- +Opportunities for personal growth and belonging
- +High-quality education and supportive professors
- +Financial aid options and focus on student well-being
- +Academic and extracurricular support
- +Strong engineering and computer science programs
- +Excellent professors in major subjects
- +Effective online learning platform
- +Inspiring faculty and practical skills development
- +Supportive and inclusive community
- +Engaging and enjoyable learning experiences
- +Supportive faculty and comprehensive programs
- +High-end facilities and professional personnel
- +Extracurricular activities and scholarships
- +High quality, world-class education at an affordable rate.
- +Flexible online learning options with approachable professors.
- +Supportive and inclusive environment with a concentrated study approach.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, including unresponsive administration and poor professor accountability.
- -Outdated facilities and curriculum that lacks current industry knowledge.
- -Unequal treatment and dismissive attitudes towards students based on their learning choices.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources negatively impact the learning environment.
- -Poor communication and a lack of student support are major concerns.
- -administrative & management issues
- -outdated facilities
- -lack of communication and transparency
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -Unclear communication and a disorganized learning environment are frustrating.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of practical application and unclear career relevance are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are evident.
- -Inconsistent enforcement of rules and staff behavior are frustrating.
Nothing to show
This institution shows notable strengths in student life, with a score of 4.28, and value, rated at 4.27. Location also received a high mark at 4.17. Conversely, facilities represent the weakest area, scoring 2.77. Other categories like professors, internationality, and accommodation fall within a moderate range.
This university presents a mixed but generally positive picture. It excels in **Value**, receiving the highest rating, and also scores very well for **Location** and **Student Life**. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as its weakest area. Ratings for **Professors** and **Internationality** are solid, while **Facilities** fall in the middle range.
Overall, this university garners strong praise, particularly for its **value**, which received the highest rating. Professors are also highly regarded, reflecting a positive academic environment. Areas with slightly lower, yet still solid, scores include facilities, accommodation, and internationality. The weakest performing category appears to be student life, indicating room for potential improvement in that aspect of the student experience.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, receiving a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, with a near-perfect rating. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which scored a solid but lower 4.0, representing the weakest aspect. Overall, the university presents a robust offering across its facilities, location, internationality, and value.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its facilities and student life. Accommodation and location also receive high marks. The university's strongest areas are its student experience and physical resources. Conversely, internationality is its lowest-rated aspect, suggesting room for improvement in fostering a more diverse and global campus community. Overall, it presents a very positive picture with only one area falling below a 4.0 rating.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Professors** and **Value**, both scoring a perfect 4 out of 5. **Student Life** and **Location** also received solid marks at 3.8. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating at 3.2, and **Internationality** at 3.4, suggesting opportunities to enhance these aspects of the university experience.
Nothing to show
~78% of reviews are positive, highlighting passionate professors, practical learning, and personal growth opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~6%) notes issues with outdated facilities and administrative responsiveness.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students highlight quality education, supportive professors, and available scholarships. A minor point (~33%) noted issues with student accommodation during enrollment.
With 100% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.25/5, students highlight the university's strong engineering reputation and effective online learning platform. Some mention the hard work required to succeed academically.
All 5 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise teaching quality, supportive faculty, and practical skills for career success. They also appreciate facilities and a fun learning environment.
With an average rating of 5/5, university reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight supportive faculty, excellent facilities, and a broad range of academic programs. Extra-curricular activities and scholarships are also appreciated.
With ~80% positive feedback, students praise high-quality, affordable education, supportive faculty, and flexible learning. A smaller ~20% of reviews express concerns about administrative processes and event prioritization over student learning.
Nothing to show
For me, PUP is okay. Because it is a public university, the facilities are not that good, but considering that the tuition is free, it is good for less fortunate students who want to finish. I have good and bad experiences in PUP just like the profs who are not that hard to teach, there are profs who are very passionate about teaching.
Nothing to show
From the vantage point of a Computer Science student, I find Mapua University's UOx (University Online) and Asynchronous Learning Platform to be a remarkable asset in augmenting my academic journey. This platform offers an array of sterling features, specifically designed to meet the demands of tech-savvy learners such as myself. My appraisal of this service is highly favorable, as elucidated below: Streamlined and Intuitive Interface: The Graphical User Interface (GUI) strikes a commendable balance between user-friendliness and sophistication, making it navigable even for those acquainted with intricate technical interfaces. The streamlined approach to various features - from submitting assignments to engaging in discourse on discussion threads - makes this platform an ease to navigate. Accessibility and Flexibility: Given the nature of a student's life, laden with multifarious commitments spanning studying and working, the asynchronous nature of UOx provides an excellent solution. The ability to view lecture recordings at my convenience, as well as access materials via cloud storage, eradicating device compatibility concerns, adds immense value to this platform. Superior Learning Tools: The platform's gamification feature is particularly noteworthy, encouraging user engagement through an award system. Moreover, integration with third-party applications, notably Moodle LMS, significantly broadens the scope of available learning resources. Robust Monitoring Dashboard: The platform integrates real-time analytics and reporting, simplifying the management of educational programs. Such insights afford educators an understanding of their course reach, looking into student engagement and usage statistics. This feature also assists administrators overseeing platform deployment across various campuses in tracking user behavior. Customizable Grading Systems: Recognizing the diverse evaluation preferences among educators, UOx allows the creation of tailored grading rubrics, aligning with individual teaching philosophies. This flexibility provides a fair and precise assessment, greatly benefiting the students. In conclusion, I am sincerely impressed with the functionality and foresight embedded within Mapua University's UOx and Asynchronous Learning Platform. The comprehensive range of its potent yet accessible features brilliantly caters to the unique demands of tech-oriented learners. As I anticipate further delving into its expansive benefits, this platform undoubtedly sets Mapua University as an appealing choice for aspiring Computer Science students seeking premium education in Southeast Asia.
In this university i found peace , friends and the quality education , its not only lectures but they make sure that the students are enjoying while learning . They will mold you into a quality employee or a future boss of your desired business , and that's what i love from them .
Nothing to show
exhausting, they're exhausting. Their priorities are the events and not the students education. They dont think about how the students will learn, they just do events. They put strict rules expecting everyone to follow but they can't implement those well because they dont do anything if someone chose to break the rules like school attire. Security guards acts superior, even when you have passed the inspection entry already and standing in front of your classroom, they'll still ask you what grade you're in, who's your teacher (they dont even know the teachers nor facilities!) they'll be suspicious of you even if you say the name, they'll ask for the very obvious room number you're waiting in front of (cause they don't unlock it before the school open). The class environment is bad— if you really want to ruin your mental health, this is for you. Students vape in the bathroom as well as in the classroom. They won't give them any form of violation paper but just warn those students, their warnings can't even do anything. You can't even access the other library, all students go in the college making us look like sardines when there's a lot of people there. Most students don't have manners, school doesn't teach morals nor basic decency. Some teachers act like you're an inconvenient when you reach out, even to the point of ignoring a student inquiring. Try it out for yourself, dont be deceived by the school facilities. They don't really offer anything good.
Nothing to show
