Polytechnic University Of the Philippines - PUP vs University of Manila - UDM vs National University - NU vs University of the East vs STI Colleges
Side-by-side comparison from 77 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Passionate, experienced, and inspiring professors
- +Affordable and practical education
- +Opportunities for personal growth and belonging
- +Innovative and forward-thinking approach to student development
- +Welcoming and supportive campus environment with accessible faculty
- +Strong academic standards and scholarship opportunities
- +High-quality education and supportive professors
- +Financial aid options and focus on student well-being
- +Academic and extracurricular support
- +Hands-on teaching and skilled, approachable professors
- +Quality education and career growth support
- +Real-world application and lively campus environment
- +Inspiring faculty and practical skills development
- +Supportive and inclusive community
- +Engaging and enjoyable learning experiences
- +Health and science focus
- +Practical communication skills
- +Excellent support for personal growth and future career development.
- +Valued guidance and mentorship from staff and professors.
- +Opportunities for global success and advancement.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unresponsive administration and poor professor accountability.
- -Outdated facilities and curriculum that lacks current industry knowledge.
- -Unequal treatment and dismissive attitudes towards students based on their learning choices.
- -Lack of qualified professors and insufficient facilities.
- -Overload of redundant subjects and lackluster programs.
- -Minimal competitive program activities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources negatively impact the learning environment.
- -Poor communication and a lack of student support are major concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency create uncertainty.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -Unclear communication and a disorganized learning environment are frustrating.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Communication and feedback from instructors are often lacking or poor.
- -Administrative & management issues are consistently problematic.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Limited opportunities for practical application and skill development are appreciated the least.
This institution shows notable strengths in student life, with a score of 4.28, and value, rated at 4.27. Location also received a high mark at 4.17. Conversely, facilities represent the weakest area, scoring 2.77. Other categories like professors, internationality, and accommodation fall within a moderate range.
Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors achieve a notably high score of 4, indicating excellent academic guidance. Conversely, the location and facilities are the weakest points, each scoring a low 2. Student life and internationality also receive moderate ratings of 2.5, while accommodation and value for money present a more favorable picture with scores of 3 and 3.5 respectively.
This university presents a mixed but generally positive picture. It excels in **Value**, receiving the highest rating, and also scores very well for **Location** and **Student Life**. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as its weakest area. Ratings for **Professors** and **Internationality** are solid, while **Facilities** fall in the middle range.
With excellent marks in several key areas, this institution shines particularly bright in **Location** (4.4) and **Professors** (4.3), alongside a strong **Value** (4.3) score. Student life also garners positive feedback at 4.1. The weakest areas, though still respectable, are **Facilities** (3.7) and **Internationality** (3.8). **Accomodation**, at 3.56, is also an area that received the lowest rating.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, receiving a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, with a near-perfect rating. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which scored a solid but lower 4.0, representing the weakest aspect. Overall, the university presents a robust offering across its facilities, location, internationality, and value.
Across the board, this institution garners perfect scores, indicating excellence in every surveyed area. Particularly outstanding are its facilities and professors, both receiving top marks. While no weak areas are identified, the consistent five-star ratings suggest a remarkably well-rounded and highly desirable university experience across all aspects of student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieved perfect scores in every category, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students, with no discernible weak areas to report.
~78% of reviews are positive, highlighting passionate professors, practical learning, and personal growth opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~6%) notes issues with outdated facilities and administrative responsiveness.
Two out of three reviews are positive, highlighting innovation, a good learning environment, and competitive programs. One review expressed concerns about qualified professors and facilities.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students highlight quality education, supportive professors, and available scholarships. A minor point (~33%) noted issues with student accommodation during enrollment.
With an average rating of 4.1/5, approximately 80% of reviews are positive, highlighting approachable professors, quality education, and hands-on learning. A small percentage of feedback mentions inconsistent P.E. professors and weak Wi-Fi.
All 5 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise teaching quality, supportive faculty, and practical skills for career success. They also appreciate facilities and a fun learning environment.
The single review for the university is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This suggests ~100% satisfaction, with commendations for its focus on health and sciences, and valuable learning in behavioral science.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students report high satisfaction, highlighting the university's role in personal growth and career development.
For me, PUP is okay. Because it is a public university, the facilities are not that good, but considering that the tuition is free, it is good for less fortunate students who want to finish. I have good and bad experiences in PUP just like the profs who are not that hard to teach, there are profs who are very passionate about teaching.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I liked how my program took really good care of my fellow students. I would like to change a few things, but they would include technology upgrades and change of faculty. For the university, I would like the administration to listen to their students, for it is their source of profit.
In this university i found peace , friends and the quality education , its not only lectures but they make sure that the students are enjoying while learning . They will mold you into a quality employee or a future boss of your desired business , and that's what i love from them .
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
