Polytechnic University Of the Philippines - PUP vs University of Manila - UDM vs Centro Escolar University - CEU vs Technological University of the Philippines - TUP vs STI Colleges

Side-by-side comparison from 73 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Polytechnic University Of the Philippines - PUP: wins 0/5 categories
University of Manila - UDM: wins 0/5 categories
Centro Escolar University - CEU: wins 1/5 categories
Technological University of the Philippines - TUP: wins 0/5 categories
STI Colleges: wins 1/5 categories
Southville International School and Colleges: wins 2/5 categories
Colegio de San Juan de Letran - CSJL: wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of International Studies
Best programme: Computer Application
Best programme: BSC Medical Laboratory Technology
Best programme: Computer Networking and Engineering Technology
Alaminos, Philippines
4.40
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer and Information Science
Best programme: Medical Laboratory Sciences
Best programme: Bachelor of Science in Business Administration (American Degree)
Category ratings
Facilities
2.77
2.50
4.20
3.67
4.20
4.00
5.00
Win
Location
4.17
2.00
4.60
4.00
4.60
2.00
4.50
Professors
3.60
4.00
4.20
4.33
4.80
Win
3.00
4.00
Internationality
3.54
2.50
4.20
3.33
4.60
5.00
Win
3.50
Student life
4.28
2.50
4.40
4.67
5.00
5.00
5.00
Value
4.27
3.50
4.60
4.67
4.60
5.00
Win
4.50
Accommodation
3.31
3.00
4.60
Win
3.67
4.00
4.00
4.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Passionate, experienced, and inspiring professors
  • +Affordable and practical education
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and belonging
  • +Innovative and forward-thinking approach to student development
  • +Welcoming and supportive campus environment with accessible faculty
  • +Strong academic standards and scholarship opportunities
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and approachable faculty
  • +Opportunities for skill development and extracurriculars
  • +Well-equipped facilities for science and practical learning
  • +Quality education and knowledgeable instructors
  • +Free tuition and state university benefits
  • +Personal development and practical skill application
  • +Inspiring faculty and practical skills development
  • +Supportive and inclusive community
  • +Engaging and enjoyable learning experiences
  • +Academic and extracurricular development
  • +Excellent facilities
  • +Supportive environment
  • +Supportive faculty and comprehensive programs
  • +High-end facilities and professional personnel
  • +Extracurricular activities and scholarships
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including unresponsive administration and poor professor accountability.
  • -Outdated facilities and curriculum that lacks current industry knowledge.
  • -Unequal treatment and dismissive attitudes towards students based on their learning choices.
  • -Lack of qualified professors and insufficient facilities.
  • -Overload of redundant subjects and lackluster programs.
  • -Minimal competitive program activities.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Overcrowding and large class sizes reduce individual attention.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are commonly criticized.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff causes dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Unclear communication and a disorganized learning environment are frustrating.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources.
  • -Inconsistent and unsupportive teaching.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of practical application and unclear career relevance are common complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution shows notable strengths in student life, with a score of 4.28, and value, rated at 4.27. Location also received a high mark at 4.17. Conversely, facilities represent the weakest area, scoring 2.77. Other categories like professors, internationality, and accommodation fall within a moderate range.

Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors achieve a notably high score of 4, indicating excellent academic guidance. Conversely, the location and facilities are the weakest points, each scoring a low 2. Student life and internationality also receive moderate ratings of 2.5, while accommodation and value for money present a more favorable picture with scores of 3 and 3.5 respectively.

This institution garners exceptional ratings across several key areas, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Accomodation**, both achieving a perfect 4.6. **Student Life** is also highly regarded at 4.4. The university demonstrates strong performance in **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality**, each scoring 4.2. While all metrics are positive, the ratings for **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** represent the comparatively lower, though still good, scores within this otherwise excellent profile.

This institution garners exceptional praise for its vibrant Student Life and outstanding Value, both scoring an impressive 4.67. Professors are also highly rated at 4.33, with Location following closely at 4.00. Areas for potential improvement include Internationality, receiving a rating of 3.33, and Facilities and Accommodation, both scoring 3.67.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, receiving a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, with a near-perfect rating. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which scored a solid but lower 4.0, representing the weakest aspect. Overall, the university presents a robust offering across its facilities, location, internationality, and value.

Overall, this institution scores highly, particularly excelling in **Student Life** and **Internationality**, both earning perfect marks. **Value** also received top ratings. Conversely, **Location** presents the weakest area with a score of 2. **Professors** received a solid but lower rating of 3. Other areas like **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are strong at 4.

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its facilities and student life. Accommodation and location also receive high marks. The university's strongest areas are its student experience and physical resources. Conversely, internationality is its lowest-rated aspect, suggesting room for improvement in fostering a more diverse and global campus community. Overall, it presents a very positive picture with only one area falling below a 4.0 rating.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~78% of reviews are positive, highlighting passionate professors, practical learning, and personal growth opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~6%) notes issues with outdated facilities and administrative responsiveness.

Two out of three reviews are positive, highlighting innovation, a good learning environment, and competitive programs. One review expressed concerns about qualified professors and facilities.

All 5 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.8/5. Recurring themes include a welcoming atmosphere, approachable and effective professors, and well-equipped facilities.

With an average rating of 4/5, ~67% of student feedback is positive. Reviewers highlight good learning experiences, kind and approachable teachers, and quality education. A few mentions of facility deficiencies were noted.

All 5 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise teaching quality, supportive faculty, and practical skills for career success. They also appreciate facilities and a fun learning environment.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive reviews, students highlight strong academics, vibrant extracurriculars, and excellent facilities. This single positive review suggests a nurturing environment for skill development and learning.

With an average rating of 5/5, university reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight supportive faculty, excellent facilities, and a broad range of academic programs. Extra-curricular activities and scholarships are also appreciated.

Rating distribution
5★
46%
0%
80%
33%
40%
100%
100%
4★
31%
67%
20%
33%
60%
0%
0%
3★
17%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
2★
4%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
PUP Honest Review

For me, PUP is okay. Because it is a public university, the facilities are not that good, but considering that the tuition is free, it is good for less fortunate students who want to finish. I have good and bad experiences in PUP just like the profs who are not that hard to teach, there are profs who are very passionate about teaching.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Tuition-Free Quality Education

First off, since it is a state university the tuition is free, and students are not paying anything. However, because it is a public university I sometimes notice deficiencies in its facility. But aside from that, I can't say anything else that is bad about it. Quality education overall.

A good example

In this university i found peace , friends and the quality education , its not only lectures but they make sure that the students are enjoying while learning . They will mold you into a quality employee or a future boss of your desired business , and that's what i love from them .

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close