Polytechnic University Of the Philippines - PUP vs De La Salle University - DLSU vs Technological Institute of the Philippines - TIP vs National University - NU vs STI Colleges

Side-by-side comparison from 82 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Polytechnic University Of the Philippines - PUP: wins 0/4 categories
De La Salle University - DLSU: wins 0/4 categories
Technological Institute of the Philippines - TIP: wins 0/4 categories
National University - NU: wins 0/4 categories
STI Colleges: wins 0/4 categories
Southville International School and Colleges: wins 0/4 categories
Lyceum of the Philippines University Manila - LPU: wins 4/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of International Studies
Best programme: Arts
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Manila, Philippines
4.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Alaminos, Philippines
4.40
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer and Information Science
Best programme: Medical Laboratory Sciences
Best programme: Bsc Hospitality and Tourism Management
Category ratings
Facilities
2.77
4.13
4.00
3.33
4.20
4.00
5.00
Win
Location
4.17
4.00
3.56
4.00
4.60
2.00
5.00
Win
Professors
3.60
4.25
3.89
3.67
4.80
3.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.54
4.75
3.33
3.67
4.60
5.00
5.00
Student life
4.28
4.38
3.67
4.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
Value
4.27
4.25
4.22
4.33
4.60
5.00
5.00
Accommodation
3.31
3.38
3.56
2.67
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Passionate, experienced, and inspiring professors
  • +Affordable and practical education
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and belonging
  • +Quality education and academic excellence
  • +Supportive professors and engaging learning environment
  • +Vibrant campus life and community spirit
  • +Strong engineering and architecture programs
  • +Good facilities and adaptive online learning
  • +Caring instructors and useful practical application
  • +High-quality education and supportive professors
  • +Financial aid options and focus on student well-being
  • +Academic and extracurricular support
  • +Inspiring faculty and practical skills development
  • +Supportive and inclusive community
  • +Engaging and enjoyable learning experiences
  • +Academic and extracurricular development
  • +Excellent facilities
  • +Supportive environment
  • +Excellent support for personal growth and future career development.
  • +Valued guidance and mentorship from staff and professors.
  • +Opportunities for global success and advancement.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including unresponsive administration and poor professor accountability.
  • -Outdated facilities and curriculum that lacks current industry knowledge.
  • -Unequal treatment and dismissive attitudes towards students based on their learning choices.
  • -Administrative and management issues prioritize the academic calendar over student well-being.
  • -Students feel uncared for by the university's response to external disruptions.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of student support are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Unclear communication and a disorganized learning environment are frustrating.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources.
  • -Inconsistent and unsupportive teaching.
  • -Administrative & management issues are consistently problematic.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -Limited opportunities for practical application and skill development are appreciated the least.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution shows notable strengths in student life, with a score of 4.28, and value, rated at 4.27. Location also received a high mark at 4.17. Conversely, facilities represent the weakest area, scoring 2.77. Other categories like professors, internationality, and accommodation fall within a moderate range.

This institution presents a varied performance across key metrics. Its strongest areas are internationality, scoring an impressive 4.75, and student life, rated at 4.375. Professors and value also received strong scores of 4.25. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.375. Facilities and location received solid mid-range scores.

This institution receives positive marks in several key areas, with **Value** standing out as its strongest point at 4.22. **Facilities** also garnered a high rating of 4.0. On the other hand, **Internationality** represents the weakest area, scoring 3.33. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded experience.

This university presents a mixed but generally positive picture. It excels in **Value**, receiving the highest rating, and also scores very well for **Location** and **Student Life**. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as its weakest area. Ratings for **Professors** and **Internationality** are solid, while **Facilities** fall in the middle range.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, receiving a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, with a near-perfect rating. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which scored a solid but lower 4.0, representing the weakest aspect. Overall, the university presents a robust offering across its facilities, location, internationality, and value.

Overall, this institution scores highly, particularly excelling in **Student Life** and **Internationality**, both earning perfect marks. **Value** also received top ratings. Conversely, **Location** presents the weakest area with a score of 2. **Professors** received a solid but lower rating of 3. Other areas like **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are strong at 4.

Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieved perfect scores in every category, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students, with no discernible weak areas to report.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~78% of reviews are positive, highlighting passionate professors, practical learning, and personal growth opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~6%) notes issues with outdated facilities and administrative responsiveness.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~89% of feedback being 4-5 stars. Students praise quality education, academic facilities, and supportive professors. A small minority (~11%) of reviews express concerns regarding student well-being during emergencies.

With an average rating of 4.56/5 from 9 reviews, ~89% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong engineering programs and good facilities. A minority of reviews found the location crowded and some instructors less engaged.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students highlight quality education, supportive professors, and available scholarships. A minor point (~33%) noted issues with student accommodation during enrollment.

All 5 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise teaching quality, supportive faculty, and practical skills for career success. They also appreciate facilities and a fun learning environment.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive reviews, students highlight strong academics, vibrant extracurriculars, and excellent facilities. This single positive review suggests a nurturing environment for skill development and learning.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students report high satisfaction, highlighting the university's role in personal growth and career development.

Rating distribution
5★
46%
33%
67%
33%
40%
100%
100%
4★
31%
56%
22%
33%
60%
0%
0%
3★
17%
0%
11%
33%
0%
0%
0%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
PUP Honest Review

For me, PUP is okay. Because it is a public university, the facilities are not that good, but considering that the tuition is free, it is good for less fortunate students who want to finish. I have good and bad experiences in PUP just like the profs who are not that hard to teach, there are profs who are very passionate about teaching.

My Experience at De La Salle University

De La Salle University and DLSU are entertaining and fulfilling to the utmost. It was great to learn my degree in Computer Science, classes were hard, however it was satisfying to see the professors challenge us in many ways. Most of my classmates would agree that DLSU does have a local atmosphere. There’s always something happening on campus, from unexpected games to events organized by various student associations. I had helpful Profs, who went out of their way to ensure that you excel. The campus amenities are also of excellent quality, the best being the library that I practically visited every day for study purposes.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

A good example

In this university i found peace , friends and the quality education , its not only lectures but they make sure that the students are enjoying while learning . They will mold you into a quality employee or a future boss of your desired business , and that's what i love from them .

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close