Universidad de Oviedo vs Universidad de Granada - UGR vs Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University vs Odessa National Polytechnic University - ONPU vs Odesa State Economic University
Side-by-side comparison from 174 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent professors and engaging teaching
- +High-quality, comprehensive curriculum and academic training
- +Good facilities and advantageous location
- +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable professors
- +Excellent city experience and affordability
- +Friendly atmosphere and good teacher-student relationships
- +Fundamental science education
- +Quality teaching and materials
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Strong academics and dedicated lecturers
- +Vibrant campus life and sense of community
- +Quality IT and applied science programs
Nothing to show
- -Lack of support and resources for academic projects.
- -Outdated or irrelevant curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Administrative and organizational issues are prevalent.
- -Lack of empathy and consideration from faculty and administration towards students.
- -Outdated or ineffective teaching methods and examination organization.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is frustrating.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are prevalent concerns.
- -Communication breakdowns and unresponsiveness from staff create a negative experience.
Nothing to show
This institution receives commendable ratings across multiple aspects. The location stands out as its strongest area, while accommodation is its weakest. Other highly-rated categories include value and internationality, demonstrating a well-rounded university experience. Facilities, professors, and student life also score positively, indicating general satisfaction with these key university features.
This institution achieves excellent scores in student life and location, its strongest attributes. Accommodations are also well-regarded. Conversely, ratings for facilities and professors are its weakest points, though still solid. Value for money and internationality are rated moderately high.
This institution achieves top marks for its **location**, rated a perfect 5. Student life and value for money also received favorable scores of 4. Conversely, internationality stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.5. Facilities, professors, and accommodation are all rated moderately at 3.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With several strong points, this university garners high marks for its location, closely followed by its professors and student life. Accommodation and value also received solid scores. However, internationality is a noted area for improvement, as is the rating for facilities. Overall, it presents a mixed but generally positive picture, with a few distinct areas of excellence and some opportunities for growth.
Nothing to show
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising the diverse curriculum, excellent professors, and helpful exam schedules. A small amount of negative feedback highlights issues with project support and career-relevant coursework.
Approximately 74% of 133 reviews are positive, praising solid academics, friendly professors, and the enriching city experience. Around 14% of feedback is negative, citing disorganization and administrative issues.
With a 3.5/5 average rating, this university receives predominantly positive feedback. One review highlights a strong classical science foundation and excellent teaching materials, though notes a desire for more modern teaching methods and staff. No negative reviews were present.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
University reviews show high satisfaction, with ~100% positive feedback. Students highlight dedicated lecturers and solid academics. Some noted areas for improvement in facilities and results.
Nothing to show
This University claims for international excellence but the reality is very different. Precarity, bad and old fashioned teachers, no accuracy to law or their own institutions. Student rights that are disappeared or bad quality on the practical subjects.
The academic content of the master has been very interesting to me and I think I have learned a lot. Coordination I think it can improve since in the subjects taught by more than one teacher I have identified a lack of coherence. In relation to the practices, several problems have arisen since, when working with the juvenile protection or penal system, on several occasions it has taken more than the appropriate period to accept the practices. Also the list of centers that were offered last year, at which point I had to choose, this year they were not offered. However, the content of the master seems very good to me.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
