Universidad de Guanajuato - UG vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Instituto Irapuato - UII vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 48 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.70)
Universidad de Guanajuato - UG: wins 1/6 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 1/6 categories
Instituto Irapuato - UII: wins 0/6 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 2/6 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Ironhack: wins 2/6 categories
Universidad Virtual del Estado de Guanajuato - UVEG: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: Communication
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
9 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
4.50
3.00
4.56
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
5.00
4.50
4.00
4.78
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.50
4.41
3.00
4.67
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.50
4.59
1.00
4.67
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.50
4.63
3.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
5.00
Win
4.63
3.00
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
4.66
Win
2.00
3.22
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Academic challenge and continuous improvement
  • +Supportive and caring faculty and staff
  • +Responsive to student well-being and voices
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities
  • +Engaging extracurriculars and activities
  • +Supportive and attentive faculty
  • +Relevant and practical course content
  • +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
  • +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
  • +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources negatively impact learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching and unclear academic expectations are major concerns.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources detract from the learning experience.
  • -Inconsistent or ineffective teaching methods and curriculum design are a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly in **Location** and **Value**, both achieving a perfect 5 out of 5. Ratings for **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality** are also outstanding, consistently at 4.5. The **Accomodation** is the lowest-rated area, though still strong at 4.

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

Assessing the university reveals a mixed but generally average performance. Location stands out as a strength, receiving a strong rating of 4. In contrast, internationality is a clear area for improvement, marked by the lowest score of 1. Facilities, professors, student life, and overall value all achieved a consistent moderate rating of 3. Accommodations present another challenge, with a score of 2 indicating potential shortcomings in this aspect.

This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Students praise academic rigor and continuous improvement, noting a focus on critical thinking and curriculum updates. They also highlight supportive faculty and staff who champion student opportunities and well-being.

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

With an average rating of 3.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Reviews highlight campus activities and offerings, though one student noted uneven teacher attention for less prominent careers.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
67%
0%
67%
0%
50%
0%
4★
50%
39%
50%
33%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
3%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close