Beijing Jiaotong University - BJTU vs Beijing University of Post and Telecommunications - BUPT vs TIAS School for Business and Society vs ESEUNE Business School vs University of Science and Technology Beijing

Side-by-side comparison from 5 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Beijing Jiaotong University - BJTU: wins 1/5 categories
Beijing University of Post and Telecommunications - BUPT: wins 0/5 categories
TIAS School for Business and Society: wins 4/5 categories
ESEUNE Business School: wins 0/5 categories
University of Science and Technology Beijing: wins 0/5 categories
Capital Normal University - CNU: wins 0/5 categories
Beijing Union University: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Urban Planning
Best programme: Business Administration
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Auditing
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Location
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.00
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
5.00
Win
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent academic programs and research focus
  • +Supportive environment for international students
  • +Abundant recreational facilities and social events
  • +Quality teaching and study atmosphere
  • +Beautiful campus environment for relaxation
  • +Personal assistance and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Engaging professors and insightful discussions

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, application-oriented education
  • +Approachable and invested professors
  • +Friendly campus and industry connections
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -Lack of engaging content and teaching methods leads to disinterest.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of student support and poor communication are prevalent concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of student support are major concerns.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution boasts exceptional ratings for its **Facilities** and **Accomodation**, both scoring a perfect 5. Areas like **Professors**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality** also received strong marks, all at 4. The university demonstrates good **Value** with a rating of 4. While no areas were rated poorly, **Accomodation** and **Facilities** stand out as the most significant strengths.

This institution presents a uniform set of ratings across all surveyed categories. Notably, there are no areas that stand out as particularly strong or weak, with all aspects receiving a score of zero. This indicates a consistent, albeit low, performance across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value.

Across the surveyed categories, this institution excels in its **facilities, professors, location, internationality, and perceived value**, all receiving perfect scores. In contrast, areas for development appear to be **student life and accommodation**, with significantly lower ratings in these aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas. Professors, location, student life, internationality, and perceived value all received excellent ratings of 4. Areas requiring more attention include facilities and accommodation, both scoring a moderate 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Both reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5 stars. Students highlight the strong academic environment, well-structured programs, and research focus, alongside convenient on-campus facilities and social events.

The single review is overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of feedback being 4-5 stars. The reviewer highlighted a strong academic atmosphere, quality teaching, and pleasant campus grounds. No negative feedback was recorded.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This suggests a highly positive experience, with feedback praising personal assistance and engaging professors. No negative feedback was reported.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With one review, the average rating is 4/5. This feedback is overwhelmingly positive, highlighting practical, application-oriented education, approachable professors, and a supportive campus environment.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

The best University in Telecom

If you want to study any related to telecommunications technology this is your best option since your first day in the campus you will feel the atmosphere of study and the quality of teaching, in addition to the beautiful gardens that the university always maintains for those moments of relaxation

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close