Brown University vs University of Medicine Tirana vs American University of Malta vs Texas A&M International University - TAMIU vs University of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy - UACEG
Side-by-side comparison from 74 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Diverse course offerings and academic exploration
- +Small class sizes and supportive learning environment
- +Excellent professors and thorough medical programs
- +Low tuition fees and scholarship opportunities
- +Strong emphasis on theoretical and practical learning
- +Engaging professors and diverse extracurricular activities
- +Affordable on-campus accommodation
- +Pleasant campus environment
- +Qualified, expert lecturers and strong programs
- +Modern facilities and good infrastructure
- +International standards and available accommodation
- +High-quality academic programs with experienced faculty
- +Emphasis on innovation and critical thinking
- +Strong focus on research opportunities
- +Top business and engineering programs
- +Good facilities and campus
- +Easy admissions
- +Inclusive community and diverse programs
- +Comprehensive education for future careers
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant concern.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Lack of practical application and patient interaction in curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues indicate a focus on profit over education.
- -Lack of qualified professors and frequent staff changes disrupt learning.
- -Poor student life and disrespectful, unprofessional staff are significant problems.
- -Disorganized administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment create inconvenient and often unsafe learning environments.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication leads to uncertainty about expectations and support.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor campus maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -The quality of teaching and curriculum relevance is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Limited career support and vague future prospects cause student dissatisfaction.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -They are unhappy with outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Students find the curriculum to be poorly structured and uninspiring.
Academia receives generally strong ratings across multiple facets. Professors are the highest-rated area, closely followed by facilities and internationality. Student life and location also score well, indicating a positive overall experience. The weakest area is accommodation, though it still maintains a favorable rating. The value proposition also stands out as a strong point.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its professor quality and location, both scoring well above average. Student life and value also received favorable ratings. Conversely, accommodation and facilities represent areas for potential improvement, with lower scores in these categories. Internationality sits near the middle of the spectrum.
This institution presents a mixed bag of ratings. Its strongest area is **Location**, receiving a respectable 3.67. In contrast, **Facilities** stand out as a clear weakness, scoring a low 1. Other areas, including Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value, fall into the mid-range with scores around 2.33. Accommodation also scores on the lower side at 2.
An impressive scorecard reveals exceptional performance across all evaluated aspects. The university garners perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. No weakest areas are identified, with every category receiving top marks, indicating a consistently outstanding offering in all surveyed domains.
This institution garners excellent scores across most aspects of university life. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation all achieve a perfect 5 out of 5. Internationality scores a respectable 4, indicating a strong but not dominant global presence. Value for money also receives a 4, suggesting a generally positive return on investment.
This institution shines brightly in student life, accommodation, and internationality, all receiving perfect scores. Its location also garners a high rating. Conversely, facilities and professors are areas where the university shows the most room for improvement, each scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5. The overall value is considered good.
This institution earns top marks in key areas like Internationality and Value, both receiving a perfect score. Facilities, Professors, and Student Life also stand out with strong ratings of 4. On the other hand, Location and Accommodation are identified as areas with moderate scores of 3, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects compared to its other strengths.
With ~95% positive feedback from 56 reviews and an average rating of 4.59/5, students praise enriching academic experiences, exceptional faculty engagement, and inclusive environments. There are no reported negative reviews.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good medical programs, dedicated professors, and thorough teaching. A small portion, ~9%, expresses concerns about a lack of practical experience and outdated materials.
With an average rating of 2.33/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is predominantly negative (~67%). Concerns include a perceived "money grab" scheme, unqualified professors, and a lack of professionalism from staff. One positive review highlighted exciting experiences, friendly staff, and affordable accommodation.
This university boasts modern facilities and qualified lecturers, with a single review highlighting its international standards and available accommodation. The feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with 100% of reviews rating it 5/5.
The single review highlights academic excellence and a rich student experience, with faculty offering practical application. No negative feedback was received, indicating a ~0% negative sentiment.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students praise its large campus, good facilities, and straightforward admissions. The Business and Engineering departments are highlighted as particularly strong.
The university receives an average rating of 4/5 stars, with approximately 100% of feedback being positive. Students highlight a vibrant and inclusive community with diverse programs and career paths.
I love my school. Who doesn't love Brown's open curriculum?? I also visited the dorms where Emma Watson stayed when she was still here - and her aura remains, with the quidditch games you can observe/participate in weekly on the Main Green. SciLi, one of the main libraries on campus, has irrefutably the most spectacular architecture that one can ever find anywhere - comparable to that of the best dorms on campus, New Pembroke 4 and Grad Center. We have a lot of activities for all sort of interests that anyone may have as well - The N. Donut Run, or the Brown Noser, being those that are most famous and renowned, far superior comparing to the Daily Herald or the Entrepreneurship Program. Brown is so left leaning that there is absolutely no income discrepancy between Christina Paxson and workers at the Ratty - our most Commie dining hall where everyone takes any amount of food they need - no matter whether they choose to participate in the meal plan or not. You can find out more about us on social media. We are extremely active on social media - the amount of posts on Dear Blueno and BBAs astound me on the daily. We have pretty fun subreddit(s) as well if you are a hippy like we are!
Nothing to show
I absolutely do not recommend this place and regret giving it a chance in the first place despite all the rumours and media talk. Now I’ve seen it first hand for myself and its beyond anything an outsider can imagine. The university has clearly been setup as a scheme of a quick money grab and not for academic purposes. Almost all professors are unqualified to teach and are simply fillers which has resulted in frequent facility member changes every semester. Basic professionalism, manners, respect are not part of AUM at all. The provosts & staff members will go head to head with students by belittling and disrespecting them. They are unprofessional & disrespectful and cannot handle any questions asked with respect in regards to academic inquires. The university is run with serious homophobia and racism throughout and has gone as far as firing 2 homosexual professors. Some professors have continuously passed on racist, homophobic and sexual commentary to students on multiple occasions during lectures with little to no action taken as students feel scared to approach staff and send complaints. The class syllabus is there for decoration and is a useless piece of paper. Full presidential scholarships are given out like candy to students who do not attend or participate in classes all year around. The careless students are being pardoned by the universities founder from the sadden group as friendships are tired in between. Only a very few students with high GPAs and a high work ethic have received a well deserved full scholarships. Other students have gotten rejected every year for any scholarship application as the full scholarships are favoured to the Jordanian students since the founder is Jordanian. Students have dropped out of the “university” for its lack of professionalism and lack of experience in running an academic place. Its a circus and a fraudulent place. Under 300k euros in profit annual is made by this "international university" by sucking money from students pockets and 14.8 million euros in losses. Ex staff and professors have come forth to some students about the university's behind the scenes treatments and sketchy "plans" and operations. All social media engagement is purchased and promoted in underdeveloped countries in order to take advantage of the less fortunate by selling them fake hopes and dreams. 2019 - 2022 has been nothing short of a nightmare at AUM. If you are serious about your studies and future do not go to this place. Students including myself gave them a chance every semester for improvement and not one stone has been moved. They ask us for feedback and waste our time in meetings only to not acknowledge a thing we've said. I have very few semesters left in this place and cannot leave now unless I get the bachelor's certificate so I do not start from square one when going elsewhere to make up for lost time at this place. You will end up wasting your time, money, energy, mental, and emotional health on people who don’t know how to run anything other than their mouths. Avoid at all costs. I could go on but this is the tamest review about my university experience at AUM.
A well established institution of higher education with modern facilities and good infrastructure. It has qualified lecturers who have deep knowledge and experience in their respective fields of study and are experts in those fields hence are able to deliver well to the students. The institution also meets the international standards hence admits even international students. Accommodation is also available for those students interested at fair prices. I studied kinesiology and left with the necessary skills that have so far led to my success in my career. It's therefore a great university that I can recommend anytime
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
