The University of Hong Kong - HKU vs The Chinese University of Hong Kong - CUHK vs School of Professional and Continuing Education - HKU Space vs Hong Kong Shue Yan University - SYU vs ESEUNE Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 42 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent academic quality and teaching by profound scholars.
- +Vibrant campus life with global students and international cultures.
- +Strong career enhancement through industry exposure and mentorship.
- +Diverse academic programs and interdisciplinary learning opportunities
- +Helpful professors and a supportive learning environment
- +Excellent campus facilities and efficient transportation
- +Practical, experienced lecturers with industry networks
- +Valuable networking opportunities through facilitators and peers
- +Abundant free events and resources
- +Supportive and guiding teachers.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Calm study spaces and good environment
- +Quality teaching and learning experience
- +Kind and genuine people
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Overcrowding and lack of resources negatively impact the learning environment.
- -Administrative and management issues, including lack of student input in leadership selection.
- -Inadequate and unreliable facilities, such as poor WiFi and insufficient laundry machines.
- -Inconvenient campus infrastructure and transportation that hinders student mobility.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are significant problems.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common complaints.
This institution receives high marks for its **location**, which scored a 4.44. Other strong areas include **facilities** (4.375), **professors** (4.333), and **value** (4.333). Areas scoring lower are **student life** (3.889) and **accommodation** (3.778), indicating these might be opportunities for improvement. **Internationality** also received a solid rating of 4.222.
This university exhibits a generally positive rating profile. Its strongest areas are **Professors** and **Value**, both receiving scores above 4.2. **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated category with a score of 3.625, indicating room for improvement in this aspect compared to other surveyed areas.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution received a uniform rating of zero. This indicates no areas of particular strength or weakness were identified in the assessment of its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or overall value. The consistent score suggests a uniform lack of positive attributes or a complete absence of data in each evaluated aspect.
This institution garners exceptional scores in key areas like facilities, professors, student life, and internationality, all receiving a perfect 5. Location and accommodation are solid with a rating of 4, suggesting good but not outstanding offerings. Value for money is also rated at 4. The university's weakest area, relative to its strengths, is its location and accommodation, though still strong overall.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its Facilities and Accommodations. The University also received strong ratings for its Location and overall Value. Student Life, while rated adequately, represents the area with the most room for improvement, scoring a 3. Internationality also stands out positively with a perfect score.
Nearly all student feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4.41/5. Students highlight excellent academics and dedicated professors, fostering personal growth. Campus life is described as vibrant and supportive.
Most reviews are positive (~87%), praising the university's top rankings, diverse college system, and extensive facilities. A few negative comments (~13%) mentioned issues with WiFi and limited laundry facilities.
The single review is positive (100%), with an average rating of 4/5 stars. This feedback highlights an experienced lecturer with practical knowledge and networking opportunities, as well as helpful volunteer facilitators.
With a single review, this university has a perfect 5/5 rating. The student expressed strong excitement and appreciation for their favorite teachers and the university. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The sole reviewer found the university environment good, with calm study spaces and effective teaching. A slight lack of communication was noted, but kindness and genuineness were appreciated.
This opinion is made in respect of the Master of Law in Human Rights programme at HKU only ("Programme"). The Law Department offers its students many opportunities to be involved in extracurricular initiatives. For instance, the academic staff often hire student researchers and the Center for Comparative and Public Law frequently seek volunteers to assist in their seminars and conferences. One of the Programme's most notable opportunities is a grant with Open Society Foundations called the 'rights and governance internship'. The Law Department also has innovative street law and clinic initiatives. Further, many of its academic staff are legal practitioners and integrate anecdotes from their practices in the classroom, which is both interesting and beneficial to the learning environment. The class sizes are intimate and allow for in-depth discussions. The elective selection could be broader (the electives are also subject to last minute changes) and the compulsory courses are not the best-fitted for all students. Since the Programme accepts students without a law degree, it is sometimes difficult to reconcile the different backgrounds and meaningfully begin a legal discussion. Some students are in the Programme for the purpose of getting an 'easy' masters-level law degree. Overall, the Programme is terrific if you are proactive in seeking opportunities to advance your studies and pave a path for your next steps. You can build strong networks. Students entering with a more passive mindset may be disappointed with the experience though.
I don't know if it's because I major in Computer Science, but most of the professors who are in charge of the major courses teach very well. They have detailed explanations with step-by-step examples that are easy to learn. The student body is mostly locals and mainlanders but you can definitely find your own niche with international students as well and make friends from India, Indonesia, and Korea. I lived in CWChu College. They had three washing machines and four driers with a balcony where you could dry your clothes below the sun. The machines are usually free if its not near the weekends. The college is quite isolated but I'd say its facilities is one of the best. The food around university is mediocre, but you could eat out once a week and you should be fine. The food won't fit you if you have high standards. The campus is also the best in Hong Kong and the most university-like in terms of scale. The campus is closely intertwined with nature and you can definitely see and feel the greenness well. The buildings are quite old but they serve their purpose. In my opinion, CUHK is a decent university with great professors and students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university is really a known place. What I like about the uni is the study space is calm, and the environment is good. The study also taught me very well. What is disliked is it was a lack of communication between one another, but everyone was very kind and genuine.
