Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University - LNMU vs Ivan Franko National University of Lviv - LNU vs Lviv Polytechnic National University - LPNU vs University of St Andrews vs Banking University Lviv Institute - Libs Ubs
Side-by-side comparison from 149 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent teachers and engaging teaching methods
- +Strong sense of community and friendships
- +Good living conditions and social events
- +Quality education and practical skills
- +Supportive environment for student initiatives
- +Strong academic reputation and historical significance
- +High-quality education and practical experience
- +Vibrant student life and extracurricular activities
- +Delicious food and modern facilities
- +Inspiring academic environment and dedicated professors
- +Vibrant student community and sense of belonging
- +Beautiful campus and engaging course content
- +Excellent facilities and practical learning opportunities.
- +Engaging and knowledgeable professors.
- +Positive overall study experience.
- +Engaging activities and legitimate university experience
- +Quality education and valuable attainment
- +Amazing sports opportunities
- +Affordable and accessible education
- +Diverse academic programs
- +Strong academic excellence and faculty
- -Outdated educational system and ill-considered practical classes.
- -Inconsistent and unfair grading, often influenced by personal motives or connections.
- -Lack of professionalism and insufficient numbers of qualified teachers.
- -Poor course organization and unclear communication regarding schedules and exams.
- -Incompetent instructors and significant issues with academic integrity and potential corruption.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are common complaints.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum design lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a frequent complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -A lack of necessary resources and support hinders learning.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
- -Inefficient administrative and management processes cause frustration.
- -Lack of engagement and accessibility from instructors is a recurring complaint.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring complaint.
- -Lack of support and resources hinders learning.
This institution garners significant praise for its accommodations and professor quality, both receiving top marks. Areas for improvement include its facilities, internationality, and location, all rated at a moderate level. Student life and overall value are considered strong points, reflecting a positive student experience.
This institution shows a strong showing in its **location**, earning a high rating. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest score among the surveyed categories. Other areas, including facilities, professors, and value, fall within a moderate range. Student life also scored lower, while accommodation received a favorable rating.
This institution garners excellent marks for its prime **location (5)** and solid performance in **facilities (4)** and **value (4)**. However, areas like **student life (3)** and **accommodation (3)** received more moderate evaluations, indicating potential for improvement. Internationality and professor quality both scored at a respectable 3.67.
Notably, the university excels in its **Professors** (4.51) and **Student Life** (4.47), with **Internationality** (4.44) and **Value** (4.38) also receiving very positive scores. **Facilities** (4.29) and **Location** (4.03) are rated well. The lowest-scoring area is **Accomodation** (3.77), indicating room for improvement in this aspect.
With consistently average ratings across all surveyed categories, this institution presents a uniform experience. No specific area stands out as a particular strength or weakness. The institution appears to offer a neutral environment in terms of facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value.
This institution demonstrates a remarkably consistent performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest asset with a perfect score. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and value all receive solid marks, indicating a well-rounded educational experience. There are no significantly weak areas identified, reflecting a high level of satisfaction across most aspects.
Across several key areas, this university garners high marks. Its strongest performances are in Value, followed closely by Professors and Student Life, indicating excellent return on investment, quality teaching, and a vibrant campus experience. The Accomodation section presents the weakest area, though still rated positively. Other categories like Facilities, Location, and Internationality also receive favorable scores, suggesting a well-rounded institutional offering.
About 50% of reviews praise the university atmosphere, supportive teachers, and city, while a small percentage of feedback (around 9%) cites issues like lack of practice and corruption.
About 68% of reviews are positive, highlighting good educational quality, opportunities for goals, and strong traditions. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions disorganized study processes and issues with some professors.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~94% favorable). Students praise high-level teachers, practical work, diverse extracurricular activities, and excellent education. A few mention minor issues with facilities and administrative speed.
Overwhelmingly positive reviews (~95%) praise the beautiful campus, inspiring academic atmosphere, dedicated professors, and diverse student societies. No negative feedback was recorded from the 80 reviews.
With one review, the university is rated 4/5 stars. This feedback is approximately 100% positive, highlighting good facilities, practical classes, and exchange program opportunities. Some professors were noted as less effective, but many were praised.
With one review, the university receives a 4/5 rating. This student found activities legitimate and sports, like basketball, amazing. No negative feedback was reported.
Students highly praise Negros Oriental State University (NORSU), citing its affordable and accessible education, recognized academic programs, and strong performance in licensure exams. All 17 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.94/5.
If be really honest our medical university has many different problems. But I want to start from pluses: first - if you want to study- you may do it, second - most of the teachers are really good, third - there are just two pluses:))) Minuses- 1) the greatest problem is that you haven't any practice (except some rare cases). 2) low level of English 3) you have no chance to choose what you prefer to study 4) corruption (sometimes your ratings do not depend on you)
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
