Universidad Interamericana para el Desarrollo - UNID vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Universidad del Claustro de Sor Juana - UCSJ vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 109 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Personalized attention and accessible learning environment
- +High quality teaching from knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Innovative programs and focus on student development
- +Integral formation and practical application of knowledge
- +Focus on developing leaders with values and strategic vision
- +Academic excellence, personal growth, and community engagement
- +Strong humanities and arts foundation.
- +Excellent, specialized programs like gastronomy.
- +Focus on humanistic skills and free thinking.
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
Nothing to show
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
- +Strong academic programs and practical preparation
- +Supportive and effective professors
- +Excellent facilities and extracurricular opportunities
- -Poor academic quality and lack of support from staff.
- -Unrealistic expectations and inconsiderate policies for students.
- -Lack of professionalism and knowledge from some teachers.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring problem.
- -Students face difficulties with unresponsive administrative and management issues.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and clear guidance is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
- -Administrative and management issues cause problems.
- -Facilities and resources are inadequate.
- -Course content and teaching methods are outdated.
Analysis of these university ratings reveals a mixed picture. The strongest areas include **Facilities**, scoring 3.55, and **Location** at 3.5. **Professors** and **Value** also received respectable scores around 3.1. Conversely, **Accomodation** (2.125) and **Internationality** (2.08) present the most significant areas for improvement, alongside **Student Life** at 2.875.
This university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 4.67. **Value** and **Internationality** also received high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **Professors** at 4.42, which represents the weakest performance among the evaluated aspects. Facilities and location are rated very favorably, around 4.5.
This institution receives strong commendations for its **professors** and **value**, both scoring a high 4.5. Facilities and location also received favorable ratings of 4. Student life is rated a respectable 3.5, while internationality stands at 2.5. The most significant area for improvement is **accommodation**, which received a low score of 1.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Nothing to show
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This university receives strong marks in several key areas, with Professors earning the highest rating. Student Life and Location are also well-regarded, alongside Value. Facilities and Internationality are rated moderately well. The weakest area of performance is Accomodation, which received the lowest score among the surveyed categories.
~74% of students provide positive feedback, praising personalized attention and good teachers. However, ~28.6% of feedback expresses concerns about slow administration and inconsistent teacher quality.
University students overwhelmingly praise its integral formation, practical study plans, and focus on developing leaders. This ~100% positive feedback highlights strong academic programs, professional readiness, and personal growth opportunities.
All reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight excellent programs and teachers in areas like Art History and Human Sciences, valuing the focus on humanistic skills and international recognition, particularly in gastronomy.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
Nearly all reviews are positive, praising excellent teachers, good facilities, and strong academic programs. A small percentage of negative feedback was noted.
If you are thinking about signing up here, I recommend that you better look for a serious university and not a duckling like this one. I tell you my experience: Of the teachers I had since the first semester, I can tell you that 3 are salvable, from then on the others leave much to be desired, from lack of professionalism to lack of knowledge about the subject they "taught". They are excellent collectors and they worry a lot because you pay in advance. They send you emails, SMS, WhatsApp, but when it comes to important information, like when your group is no longer profitable and you will have to take classes if you want with another career or to let you know that I do not know who happened to have 5 hours of a subject with only one teacher at a time is a good idea when you have 6 semesters there ... For that there is nothing, no emails, calls, WhatsApp, absolutely nothing. The truth is, if you enter this university, you must be ready to how badly they'll treat you, won't follow up, will make changes without notifying you, won't consult you, will lie constantly and won't look you in the eyes ... The last thing was that I asked for my monthly reimbursement since they never gave us an option that will work for us and that my transcript of matters has no cost to me since they were the ones who did not fulfill their part of the deal and Reyna dares to lie, saying that I would pass my leave, complaint, and request ... It never did, it took 3 weeks without a solution. Today I finally spoke with someone else and I hope to have my leave and papers soon. And if they do not return my money, I hope they ask their God to forgive them for all the ball of lies they say because on earth they are going to turn off. In the end, do not waste your money and time, it's not worth it.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
