Nyenrode Business University vs University of Amsterdam - UvA vs Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs Hotelschool The Hague vs TIAS School for Business and Society
Side-by-side comparison from 273 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High academic standard with practical, engaging learning
- +Supportive community and numerous opportunities
- +International environment and experienced faculty
- +Approachable and supportive professors
- +Well-designed, up-to-date curriculum and academic programs
- +Good student support and facilities
- +Engaging academic programs and knowledgeable, supportive faculty
- +Diverse and international campus environment with ample extracurricular opportunities
- +Balance of theory and practical application in studies
- +Strong hospitality and business programs
- +Opportunities for personal and professional development
- +Diverse and inclusive community
- +Personal assistance and welcoming atmosphere
- +Engaging professors and insightful discussions
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
- -Overcrowded classes and poor teaching quality are disliked.
- -Lack of student support and care.
- -Poor program value and teaching effectiveness.
- -Administrative and communication issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and confusion.
- -Lack of support and flexibility during personal emergencies is a significant problem.
- -Inconsistent policies and unfair treatment are prevalent concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
This university garners strong ratings, with **Student Life** and **Value** particularly excelling at 4.5. **Facilities** are also highly regarded at 4.44. **Location** stands out as the comparatively weakest area, rated at 4.0, though still solid. Overall, the institution presents a well-rounded positive picture across its offerings.
A mixed performance is evident across the surveyed categories. The university excels in **Location** (4.59) and **Internationality** (4.49), with **Facilities** (4.27) also receiving high marks. **Professors** (4.11) and **Student Life** (4.07) are rated favorably, as is **Value** (4.07). However, **Accomodation** stands out as a significantly weaker area, scoring considerably lower than other aspects.
Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution excels in **Internationality**, boasting a score of 4.45, closely followed by **Professors** at 4.30 and **Location** at 4.30. **Student Life** and **Value** also received positive marks. The primary area for improvement lies in **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating.
The university presents a mixed but generally positive review. Facilities stand out as its strongest area, earning a notable 3.67. Areas like Professors, Location, and Accommodation received a solid 3. Conversely, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all scored a comparable 3.33. While facilities are a definite highlight, teaching quality and on-campus experience appear to be areas for potential improvement.
Across the surveyed categories, this institution excels in its **facilities, professors, location, internationality, and perceived value**, all receiving perfect scores. In contrast, areas for development appear to be **student life and accommodation**, with significantly lower ratings in these aspects.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise high academic standards, practical learning, and an international environment. Some administrative processes could be faster, but ~0% of feedback is negative.
~96% of 179 reviews are positive, highlighting good quality education, approachable professors, and improving courses. A small fraction of feedback mentions issues with program value and student support.
With a 4.3/5 average rating from 57 reviews, ~91% of feedback is positive. Students highlight the multicultural environment, engaging academic programs, and valuable campus resources like the library and modern facilities. No negative reviews were provided.
About 67% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong personal development and professional industry insights. The remaining 33% of feedback mentions issues with fairness and accountability.
With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This suggests a highly positive experience, with feedback praising personal assistance and engaging professors. No negative feedback was reported.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
My experience at Nyenrode Business University has been truly transformative. The program combines rigorous academic instruction with real-world business challenges, allowing me to grow both professionally and personally. One of the most striking aspects is the emphasis on leadership and personal development—elements that are not only taught but also practiced. The small class sizes foster close relationships with professors and fellow students, creating a strong and supportive learning environment. The beautiful and peaceful campus is ideal for focusing on your studies. Overall, I highly recommend Nyenrode to anyone looking to further their business skills while developing as a responsible leader.
The costs for EU students are ok. Housing is still crazy and you are lucky if you get assistance with that, but when you do, it's very good for the money. The classes are a bit big but we manage. I feel the curriculum is complete and up to date and theres nothing missing from my education
As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Here's the corrected version: I graduated from the remote full-stack web development bootcamp in April 2025, and I feel very stupid because I paid these people while others studied for free. On top of that (or probably for that reason), Ironhack staff is arrogant and inexperienced. Take a look at the images I uploaded on Google for IronHack Madrid. The first is of the Program Manager (some sort of head of the online courses), and the second image shows a "teacher" assistant mocking me by telling me to use my fingers to type. What you should also know is that almost nobody pays for their courses directly—instead, the governments of Germany, France, Netherlands, etc. pay for people who are unemployed, along with other forms of financing. For that reason, the quality is very low because students behave as if they have received a gift or favor (so they leave good reviews), and the "school" acts accordingly. For example, the materials are completely outdated, and they don't want to help students—they tell students to ask questions through an app called Slack. While students are struggling to understand and have to write their questions, teachers and management are having "meetings" or maybe playing video games ... feeding their cats ... who knows? What I know is that they don't like to help.
