Mataram University - Unram vs Pedagogical University of Kraków vs Universidad del Claustro de Sor Juana - UCSJ vs ArtEZ University of the Arts vs Antalya Bilim University

Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Antalya Bilim University (5.00)
Mataram University - Unram: wins 3/7 categories
Pedagogical University of Kraków: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad del Claustro de Sor Juana - UCSJ: wins 0/7 categories
ArtEZ University of the Arts: wins 0/7 categories
Antalya Bilim University: wins 3/7 categories
Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram: wins 0/7 categories
Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Kupang: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Humanities
Zwolle, The Netherlands
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Education Studies
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
Win
3.90
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Location
Not rated
4.80
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.50
4.40
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
4.00
3.90
2.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.50
Win
4.30
3.50
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Value
4.00
4.50
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
4.50
Win
3.89
1.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse and complete study programs
  • +Improved facilities and infrastructure
  • +Strong graduate employability
  • +Approachable and supportive lecturers
  • +Welcoming community and connections
  • +Convenient city center location and infrastructure
  • +Strong humanities and arts foundation.
  • +Excellent, specialized programs like gastronomy.
  • +Focus on humanistic skills and free thinking.

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging lessons and supportive professors
  • +Beautiful campus environment and summer school opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -The facilities are outdated and in need of renovation.
  • -The quality of teaching and curriculum is disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and clear guidance is prevalent.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this institution receives excellent marks in several key areas, with Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all rated a strong 4.5. Internationality and Value are also highly regarded at 4 and 4 respectively. The most significant weakness identified is its Location, which received a score of 0.

The university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **Location**, receiving a near-perfect score. **Professors** and **Student Life** also stand out with very high ratings. Areas for potential improvement are **Facilities** and **Accommodations**, which are rated moderately well. **Internationality** and **Value** are also strong aspects of the university experience.

This institution receives strong commendations for its **professors** and **value**, both scoring a high 4.5. Facilities and location also received favorable ratings of 4. Student life is rated a respectable 3.5, while internationality stands at 2.5. The most significant area for improvement is **accommodation**, which received a low score of 1.

Nothing to show

A notable academic reputation is evident, with standout scores in Professors, Internationality, and Value, all receiving perfect marks. Student Life and Accomodation also scored well, indicating positive campus experiences. Conversely, Facilities and Location received zero ratings, suggesting these are areas requiring significant improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 3.6/5, university reviews are predominantly positive (~60%). Students appreciate the diverse study programs and career prospects. A small amount of negative feedback (~20%) points to less than ideal facilities, though some improvements have been noted.

Students praise the university's great atmosphere, approachable and professional lecturers, and accessible location with good infrastructure. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4/5.

All reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight excellent programs and teachers in areas like Art History and Human Sciences, valuing the focus on humanistic skills and international recognition, particularly in gastronomy.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 5/5, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highly recommend educational studies, praising well-done lessons, welcoming professors, and a beautiful environment. The summer school is also highlighted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
20%
40%
67%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
40%
20%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
20%
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
2★
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close