Universidad de Panamá - UP vs Universidad Tecnológica de Panamá - UTP vs Universidad Católica Santa María La Antigua - USMA vs Universidad Latina de Panamá - ULAT vs Universidad Interamericana de Panamá - UIP
Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive professors and career guidance
- +Website and administrative support issues
- +Limited campus life vibrancy
- +Academic excellence and personal development
- +Tools for success in the modern world
- +Fostering self-taught learning and critical thinking
- +Varied internship opportunities and career guidance
- +State-of-the-art facilities and passionate faculty
- +Commitment to accommodating diverse lifestyles
- +High-quality professors
- +Collaborative learning environment
- +Challenging administrative processes
- +Supportive administration and teachers
- +Long-term alumni support
Nothing to show
- +Important for sector leadership training
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of student support and clear communication is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Excessive workload and lack of support.
- -Ineffective teaching and unclear expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
- -Lack of professor engagement and support hinders learning.
- -Scheduling conflicts and unreliable information are frequent frustrations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities and resources are often outdated or insufficient.
- -Course content and teaching methods are frequently criticized as ineffective.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in poor condition.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
This institution receives excellent marks for its Professors and Location, both scoring a perfect 5. Facilities and Accomodation are also strong, with ratings of 4. Student Life, Internationality, and Value are identified as areas with more moderate scores, all receiving a 3.
This institution receives high marks for its professors, location, and student life, all scoring an impressive 4.67. Facilities and value are also strong, averaging 4.33. The university's weakest areas lie in accommodation and internationality, with ratings of 3.67 and 3.33 respectively, suggesting room for improvement in these specific aspects.
Overall, this institution garners exceptional ratings, particularly excelling in Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Internationality, all achieving a perfect score. Accommodations and Location are also strong points, each receiving a commendable 4 out of 5. The university also scores a perfect 5 for Value, indicating a highly positive overall assessment.
Among the surveyed categories, the university particularly excels in its **Location**, receiving a high score of 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as a significant weakness, with a rating of just 1. Ratings for Professors, Internationality, and Value are moderate at 3. Facilities and Student Life both received lower marks of 2.
This institution shines with perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value. These areas represent its strongest offerings, suggesting a well-rounded and high-quality educational experience. However, significant weaknesses are evident in Location and Accommodation, which received no points, indicating potential drawbacks in these crucial aspects for students.
Nothing to show
This institution shines brightly in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its professors, location, student life, internationality, and value. Prospective students will find a vibrant and well-supported environment in these regards. However, significant areas for improvement are apparent, with zero ratings for both facilities and accommodation, indicating these are considerably lacking.
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, feedback is largely positive. One student highlighted a good professor and career support, but noted a less lively campus and unhelpful administration with website issues.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight academic excellence, personal development, and preparation for the modern world.
With two positive reviews and an average rating of 5/5, students praise varied internship opportunities, helpful workshops, state-of-the-art classrooms, and distinguished faculty. The university is also noted for its commitment to accommodating diverse lifestyles.
With an average rating of 3.33/5, ~67% of reviews are positive, praising professors and learning potential. ~33% of feedback expresses dissatisfaction with administrative processes, lack of automation, and unhelpful staff.
With a 5/5 average rating from one review, students highlight the supportive administration and teachers. This singular positive experience suggests a focus on student improvement and post-graduation assistance.
Nothing to show
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being highly satisfied. Students praise the tourism degree as crucial for leadership development in the sector and express a desire to contribute to its economic growth.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show