Universitat d'Alacant vs Universidad Miguel Hernández - UMH vs Escola d'Art i Superior de Disseny d'Alacant - EASDA vs C3S Business School in Barcelona - C3S vs Fundesem Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 164 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent campus environment and facilities
- +Supportive and passionate teaching staff
- +Vibrant student life and city atmosphere
- +Strong academic and research support
- +Interdisciplinary and research-oriented programs
- +Modern facilities and collaborative environment
- +Professional, involved instructors and familiar atmosphere.
- +Diverse design degree specializations.
- +Improving organization and future outlook.
- +Passionate and knowledgeable faculty providing strong support for career readiness.
- +Diverse and welcoming multicultural environment fostering collaboration and soft skills.
- +Accessible instructors and helpful staff dedicated to student success and growth.
Nothing to show
- +Experiential learning and entrepreneurship opportunities
- +Direct access to industry leaders (CXOs, CEOs)
- +Valuable networking and lifelong friendships
- +Practical, real-world learning and projects
- +Strong professor guidance and international connections
- +Personalized support and career development
- -Teaching quality and academic training are lacking.
- -Outdated facilities and inefficient administration are problematic.
- -Administrative and management issues, including retroactive law application.
- -Outdated and insufficient facilities negatively impacting campus life.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities with difficult access.
- -Disappointing academic experience despite qualified teachers.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Lack of support for internships and career services is a recurring complaint.
- -Inconsistent staff helpfulness and unaddressed student grievances are disliked.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from the institution are frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of support and communication from instructors and staff is a common complaint.
This institution demonstrates particularly strong performance in Student Life, achieving a rating of 3.95. Internationality and Facilities also received favorable scores. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.27, indicating room for improvement in this category. The remaining aspects, including Professors, Location, and Value, received moderate to good ratings.
This institution demonstrates a commendable overall performance, with its **Facilities** standing out as the highest-rated area. Student Life, Professors, and Internationality also receive strong scores. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest aspect of the university's offerings. While Location and Value are rated moderately well, improvements in the accommodation sector could significantly enhance the student experience.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution received a uniform rating of zero. This indicates no specific strengths or weaknesses were identified within facilities, professor quality, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value for money. The consistent score across every aspect suggests a need for comprehensive review and development across all operational and academic areas.
This institution garners significant praise, particularly for its professors, internationality, and location, all receiving scores above 4.4. Student life and value also score highly. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a considerably lower rating. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering, though improvements could be made in its housing provisions.
Nothing to show
Across a range of metrics, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and overall Value, all receiving perfect scores. Location, Facilities, and Accommodations also stand out with high ratings. While no specific area received a low score, the consistency across the board suggests a well-rounded institution with particularly strong offerings in teaching quality and student experience.
Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in **Facilities** and **Professors**, both receiving near-perfect scores. **Student Life** is also highly rated. The **weakest areas**, while still strong, are **Accommodations** and **Location**. Overall, the university presents a commendable academic and social environment, with value and internationality also receiving positive marks.
The vast majority of reviews (~95%) are positive, highlighting the campus and study programs. A small portion of feedback (~5%) points to concerns with teaching quality.
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~74%) for academic and research support, interdisciplinary programs, and a conducive environment. A small percentage (~4.6%) of reviews mention some limitations in campus facilities.
Two of three reviews are positive, highlighting professional teachers and learning opportunities. One review is negative, citing poor facilities and access, despite mentioning personalized treatment. The average rating is 3/5.
With a 4.54 average rating, ~95% of reviews are positive, praising enthusiastic faculty, a diverse and supportive environment, and strong career preparation. A small minority (~5%) express dissatisfaction with staff consistency and internship support.
Nothing to show
All three reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight real-world business experience, including product development and profit generation, and valuable learning from industry leaders. They also praise opportunities for international collaboration and lifelong friendships.
All 13 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.92/5. Students highlight the practical, human, and international nature of the program, valuing real projects, professor connections, and career support. No negative feedback was reported.
Universitat d'Alacant enhances the energy of its campus community through a diverse selection of extracurricular activities. The university fosters an atmosphere that nurtures creativity and individual development, reflected in its modern facilities and dynamic learning environments. Professors, characterized by their passion and expertise, implement creative teaching approaches.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
C3S is a very good Institution for International Students. The lecturers here are so enthusiastic and truly passionate about their subjects; their knowledge and encouragement make me feel ready for my future career. At C3S, I really felt like I belonged; the diversity is incredible, and everyone is genuinely kind. Plus, the support systems are really strong. The courses are top-notch, and the learning experience really sets you up for great career opportunities.
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
I enjoyed this programe, academically is it similar to other programs in other cities but it offers so much more. The personal connection with professors, strong guidance for future career and the international network is what separates it from other options!
