Cyprus University of Technology - CUT vs Girne American University - GAU vs Ctl Eurocollege vs European University Cyprus vs Neapolis University Pafos

Side-by-side comparison from 33 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Unicaf (4.30)
Cyprus University of Technology - CUT: wins 1/6 categories
Girne American University - GAU: wins 0/6 categories
Ctl Eurocollege: wins 0/6 categories
European University Cyprus: wins 0/6 categories
Neapolis University Pafos: wins 0/6 categories
Mesoyios College: wins 0/6 categories
Unicaf: wins 5/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Communication and Internet Studies
Best programme: Bachelor of Science in Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics
Limassol, Cyprus
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Limassol, Cyprus
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Limassol, Cyprus
4.30
Top
Read more reviews
7 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Law LLB
Category ratings
Facilities
3.50
3.13
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.80
Win
Location
4.58
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.42
Win
4.11
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
4.14
Internationality
3.17
3.89
Not rated
Not rated
2.67
Not rated
4.00
Win
Student life
4.18
3.11
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.60
Win
Value
3.75
3.56
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
4.14
Win
Accommodation
3.25
2.67
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging courses and supportive, knowledgeable lecturers.
  • +Balanced academic and social life with good resources.
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and career opportunities.
  • +Supportive and guiding teachers
  • +Encouraging and inspiring environment
  • +Excellent resources and student life support

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Strong professional experience and helpful professors
  • +Diverse international student community

Nothing to show

  • +Flexible online programs and self-paced learning
  • +Supportive and accessible tutors and lecturers
  • +Scholarships and affordability
Cons
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum lacks relevance and effective teaching methods.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as uninspired and disconnected from real-world applications.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Unfair and suspicious grading system, particularly regarding thesis evaluation.
  • -Lack of transparency and truthfulness in communication from the university and supervisors.

Nothing to show

  • -Low quality of studies and lack of acquired knowledge.
Rating summary
What students say

A strong academic reputation is evident, with professors receiving high marks. The university also excels in its attractive location and vibrant student life. However, areas for improvement include facilities and accommodation, which received more moderate scores. Internationality and overall value fall within a similar range, suggesting opportunities for growth in these aspects.

This institution receives its highest marks for the quality of its professors, followed closely by its internationality and location. Conversely, accommodation appears to be the weakest area, with the lowest rating. Facilities and student life also received middling scores, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects of the university experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a solid overall performance, this institution excels in several key areas. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all received high marks, indicating a positive campus environment and convenient surroundings. However, the university's strongest areas are contrasted by lower scores for professors and internationality, suggesting potential room for improvement in academic support and global engagement. The value also appears to be a weaker point.

Nothing to show

This institution garners high marks across most evaluated aspects. Its **location** stands out as a perfect 5, indicating exceptional appeal in this area. Student life and facilities also receive strong ratings, with 4.6 and 4.8 respectively. The weakest areas, though still positive, are **accommodation** and **internationality**, both rated at 4, and professors and value, which are rated at approximately 4.14.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.08/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~77%). Students praise the university for a strong academic and social balance, supportive lecturers, and valuable learning resources. No negative feedback was provided.

About 70% of feedback is positive, highlighting supportive teaching staff and a good learning environment. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 2/5, negative feedback (~67%) dominates. Students express dissatisfaction with the grading system, citing unfairness and suspicion. One positive comment highlights valuable professional experience and helpful professors.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.29/5, ~86% of student reviews are positive, highlighting superb education, supportive tutors, and flexible online programs. A small amount of negative feedback (~14%) cites concerns about study quality.

Rating distribution
5★
31%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
71%
4★
46%
50%
0%
0%
33%
0%
14%
3★
23%
30%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
67%
0%
14%
Most useful review
Most liked
Good

Academicaly is excellent. Administratively bad. Accomodation has very good prices for students and some are new. Facilities need changes. The location of the university is the best part though students have problems with the parking area.

Excellent

A renounced and progressive university that offers student with the best education and goes beyond and over to help students achieve excellence in their respective departments. An environment that supports and encourages student to strive .

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Worst Diploma Thesis Experience

I had the worst possible experience during my diploma thesis grading, plus the overall grading system works in a very suspicious way and is totally unfair. My 1st degree is from an Engineering university (5years - integrated master) thus I had high expectations which were proven to be false. Throughout the thesis process, I was repeatedly assured that everything was progressing well. My supervisor gave me the impression that my work met all expectations and that my performance was strong. However, I was surprised and disheartened to receive a final thesis grade of 8/10, which was significantly lower than my average course grades, typically around 9/10. This discrepancy brought down my final degree average to 8.6, which does not reflect the overall quality and consistency of my academic performance. In higher level universities, you are supposed to get your best grade in your best project, which is your thesis, but not on Neapolis Pafos University apparently. Regarding my work, please note that even at my presentation everyone was thrilled about my work (I also answered every question with great success as they mentioned). All 3 supervisors congratulated me and then gave me an 8. I wanted some feedback, and I tried to call my supervisor but he rejected every single one of my calls!! Hilarious. The lack of alignment between the supervisor’s feedback and the final grade raises concerns about fairness and consistency in the grading system.

Nothing to show

the educaton

the education and support given is superb. They have tutor on standby to help. The facilities and the online education is top class, actually world class. I was very impressed with how the lecturers are supportive also

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close