Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila - UAdeC vs Universidad Politecnica de Ramos Arizpe - UPRA vs Universidad politécnica de la region Laguna - UPRL vs Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro - UAAAN vs Instituto de Comunicación Gráfica del Norte - ICN
Side-by-side comparison from 30 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent preparation and industry-relevant programs.
- +High-quality teachers with real-world experience.
- +Strong reputation and global opportunities.
Nothing to show
- +Well-equipped labs and specialized engineering programs
- +High-quality faculty with advanced degrees
Nothing to show
- +Talented, professional teachers offering guidance and freedom.
- +Valuable industry insights through guest professionals and workshops.
Nothing to show
- +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
- +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
- +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and in need of improvement.
- -Lack of clarity and communication regarding academic matters is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often perceived as inadequate.
Nothing to show
- -Lack of clear communication and organization from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unresponsive or unhelpful instructor support.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
This institution receives excellent marks for its **Location**, achieving a perfect score. **Facilities** are also a notable strength. Conversely, **Internationality** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Other aspects like **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value** fall within a moderate range, while **Accomodation** scores slightly below average.
Nothing to show
Across all evaluated aspects, this university received a rating of 0 for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. Consequently, no specific areas can be highlighted as strongest or weakest. The university's performance is uniformly assessed at the lowest possible mark across every category surveyed.
Nothing to show
Across all surveyed categories, the university received ratings of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses in any area, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. The consistent zero score suggests a uniform absence of positive or negative performance metrics.
Nothing to show
Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.
Most reviews praise excellent teachers and infrastructure, highlighting good preparation and regional reputation. A small percentage mention minor concerns about some teachers' knowledge or course relevance to industry.
Nothing to show
The sole review is overwhelmingly positive (100%), praising prepared professors and well-equipped engineering labs. The average rating is 4/5.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight talented teachers offering creative freedom and professional workshops for a broader career perspective. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
