Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa - UNSA vs Universidad Católica de Santa María - UCSM vs University of Hohenheim vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs School of Hospitality and Tourism Porto - ESHT

Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.60)
Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa - UNSA: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Católica de Santa María - UCSM: wins 0/7 categories
University of Hohenheim: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 2/7 categories
School of Hospitality and Tourism Porto - ESHT: wins 5/7 categories
Universidad Católica San Pablo - UCSP: wins 0/7 categories
Telkom University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Stuttgart, Germany
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Best programme: Hospitality Management
Bandung, Indonesia
4.40
Read more reviews
13 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.40
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.36
Location
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.70
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.62
Professors
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.60
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.15
Internationality
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.60
Win
4.50
Not rated
4.15
Student life
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.90
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.31
Value
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.90
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.54
Accommodation
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.38
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +University offers personal growth and opportunity discernment.
  • +Free tuition and a sense of belonging are appreciated.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
  • +Excellent and attentive teachers and a welcoming atmosphere.
  • +Comprehensive and well-designed courses preparing for the job market.
  • +Positive interactions with colleagues and a sensational overall experience.

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging professors and effective course content
  • +Abundant laboratory facilities and strong alumni network
  • +Clean campus and dedicated educators
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
  • -The curriculum often feels irrelevant, unengaging, or poorly structured.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
  • -Disorganized and uncommunicative administration.
  • -Insufficient resources and support.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor communication and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Lack of up-to-date facilities and resources.
  • -Inconsistent or unengaging teaching quality.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a well-rounded profile, with particularly strong ratings in **Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accommodation**, all receiving a score of 4 out of 5. The university also scores well on **Value**. In contrast, **Internationality** is its weakest area with a rating of 3, while **Professors** received a solid 3.5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

This institution excels across several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and value. Internationality is also a significant strength, rated at 4.5. The only area receiving a slightly lower, though still strong, rating is location, scoring a 4. Overall, the university presents a highly positive profile with exceptional strengths in student experience and academic quality.

Nothing to show

This institution performs exceptionally well in several key areas, with its **Value** and **Accomodation** receiving the highest marks. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also stand out as significant strengths. Conversely, the university's **Location** is rated comparatively lower than other aspects. Overall, it presents a strong offering, particularly in terms of student experience and perceived worth.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Two out of three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 3.67/5. Students highlight opportunities for personal growth and value the university's legacy, though one notes a decline in academic standards.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, university reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight excellent teachers, a welcoming atmosphere, and enriching course experiences. All feedback is positive.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.38/5 from 13 reviews, ~85% of students praise professors and the course. No negative feedback was reported.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
0%
60%
50%
0%
54%
4★
67%
0%
0%
40%
50%
0%
31%
3★
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
15%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Tradicional University

San Agustín de Arequipa University is the most important university in Arequipa city. The reason? A lot of famous people were in that house of studies. Personally, I think that nowadays the university keeps their essence but not the academic level to the modern world. Anyway, studying there is free and is not bad to start! I feel agustina!

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close