Lund University vs Universidad de Puerto Rico - UPR vs University of Bayreuth vs University of Puerto Rico Rio Piedras vs Akaki Tsereteli State University
Side-by-side comparison from 62 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality education and expert faculty
- +Vibrant student life and diverse community
- +Supportive and welcoming environment
- +Diverse, high-quality academic programs and career opportunities
- +Supportive faculty and a strong sense of community and personal growth
- +Open, inclusive, and professional campus environment
- +excellent support for international students
- +outstanding campus services
- +welcoming atmosphere
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Well-prepared teaching staff and continuous training
- +Excellent facilities and positive environment
- +Affordable tuition costs and high educational standards
- +International recognition and diverse student body
- +Focus on English language programs
Nothing to show
- +High-quality, practical, hands-on teaching
- +Focus on professional tools and industry relevance
- -Discrimination and lack of opportunities post-graduation.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Ineffective teaching and poor curriculum structure lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Students face significant administrative hurdles and harassment from foreign office bureaucracy.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and unclear communication frustrate students.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
Student life emerges as the university's strongest area, boasting the highest rating. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other aspects like location, internationality, and facilities also scored well, with professors and value demonstrating solid, albeit slightly lower, marks.
This academic institution garners praise across multiple facets, with exceptional marks for **location** (4.88) and **professors** (4.56). Student life and overall value also receive strong scores around 4.44. The weakest area identified is **facilities**, rated at 3.5. Other positive aspects include accommodations and internationality, both scoring above 4.2.
The university garners strong ratings in its academic and campus offerings, with particularly high marks for professors and student life. Facilities and location also receive positive scores, indicating a well-rounded environment. However, areas like accommodation and internationality are rated more moderately, suggesting potential for improvement. Value for money is also rated at a similar level, indicating a balanced but not outstanding offering.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in several key areas, with perfect scores awarded for its professors, location, and student life. Internationality also receives a positive rating. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and accommodation, which are rated moderately well. Overall, the university offers strong value and excels in its academic and social offerings.
Remarkably high marks were awarded across several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Location, and Student Life all achieved a perfect score of 5. Areas such as Accomodation, Internationality, and Value were also well-regarded, each receiving a score of 4. This indicates a generally strong offering, with a few minor opportunities for improvement.
Nothing to show
Offering a prime location, this institution scores exceptionally well in that regard, alongside strong marks for professors, student life, and internationality. However, accommodation presents a significant weakness, receiving the lowest rating. Facilities and value are rated moderately.
With a 4.41 average rating, ~98% of reviews are positive, praising high-level education, great student life, and community. A very small amount of negative feedback mentioned racism and time/money waste.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.55/5. Students highlight excellent faculty, diverse programs, and a supportive environment for personal and professional growth. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 3/5, student feedback is split, with positive mentions of campus services and international student support, while negative reviews highlight significant difficulties with the foreign office.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 2 reviews, the university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight supportive and knowledgeable professors, along with excellent facilities and a positive environment. No negative feedback was provided.
This university receives a perfect 5/5 rating based on one review. The feedback highlights the institution's state funding, international recognition, and affordable tuition, offering a high standard of education and prioritizing English language programs. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this program is overwhelmingly positive. Students praise high-quality, practical teaching with a hands-on approach. There is minimal negative feedback.
The university is beautiful, there is no doubt about that. Although it is one of the most multicultural campuses in the world, the course I took was not inclusive for foreign students. The course was advertised as a course designed specifically for foreigners, with classes in English. In practice, many of the classes on the syllabus were actually in Swedish, and the ones that were in English gave exercises or texts in Swedish. I even had a disagreement with one of the professors who, although he was teaching a class that was supposed to be entirely in English, brought slides in Swedish and spoke exclusively in Swedish. When I asked during the break if the class shouldn't be in English, he ridiculed me in front of the class and said that if I was uncomfortable, I should have said so beforehand. The universitys advisors were very understanding, but in the end, I had to give up many of the assigned subjects and replace them with subjects that had nothing to do with my field, just because they were, in fact, taught in English.
Nothing to show
the university is located in a city where the foreign office makes the life so difficult for people that a visit to the auslandersamt is all they think about, almost all my classmates left the university after the harassment by the auslandersamt(foreign office) however race has nothing to do it as a few of my white American friends also had to drop out of their studies due to the harassment. Irrespective of how good the studies are or how beautiful the city is, it doesn't matter when the foreign office destroys your career. A good scenery won't bring back years you wasted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
