Johan Cruyff Institute vs University of Amsterdam - UvA vs Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs Duisenberg School of Finance vs ONCAMPUS Global
Side-by-side comparison from 289 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Specialized sports management content and expert professors
- +Valuable industry connections and networking opportunities
- +Welcoming atmosphere and excellent staff support
- +Approachable and supportive professors
- +Well-designed, up-to-date curriculum and academic programs
- +Good student support and facilities
- +Engaging academics and strong program content
- +Vibrant international and multicultural community
- +Opportunities for practical application and personal growth
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Holistic learning approach
- +Positive overall experience
- +Strong recommendation
- +Practical, hands-on learning with industry-relevant lecturers
- +Broad program offering diverse career paths post-graduation
- +Engaging real-world business case applications
- -Poor quality of instruction and unengaging student discussions.
- -Ineffective project management and lack of professional experience among peers.
- -Lack of student support and care.
- -Poor program value and teaching effectiveness.
- -Administrative and communication issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources impede learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are significant drawbacks.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Ineffective teaching and unsupportive instructors.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated systems and administrative issues
- -Poor quality and unreliable teaching delivery
- -Lack of practical application and outdated facilities
Across several key areas, the institution receives commendable ratings. Its strongest performances are noted in Value and Internationality, both achieving near-perfect scores. Professors also garnered exceptionally high marks. The weakest area is Location, which, while still positive, is rated lower than other aspects. Student Life, Accomodation, and Facilities all fall within a strong middle range.
A mixed performance is evident across the surveyed categories. The university excels in **Location** (4.59) and **Internationality** (4.49), with **Facilities** (4.27) also receiving high marks. **Professors** (4.11) and **Student Life** (4.07) are rated favorably, as is **Value** (4.07). However, **Accomodation** stands out as a significantly weaker area, scoring considerably lower than other aspects.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas, notably Internationality, which earned a high score. Professors and Location also received very positive feedback. The university's performance in Student Life and Value is also solid. However, Accomodation stands out as a weaker area, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Facilities also received a moderate rating.
Nothing to show
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
This institution receives top marks in key areas, including its professors, international outlook, and overall value. Conversely, it scores zero in facilities, location, student life, and accommodation. These extreme ratings suggest a university that excels in academic and global aspects, but has significant shortcomings in its physical campus and student experience offerings.
This university demonstrates a solid performance in its **facilities and professors**, both scoring a respectable 3.67. The **student life and value** also receive a decent rating of 3.33. However, the **accommodation and location** stand out as weaker areas, receiving the lowest scores. Internationality is rated moderately at 3.0.
University students largely praise the insightful sports management content, quality professors, and valuable networking opportunities, with a ~96% positive sentiment. A small fraction of feedback (~4%) mentions issues with academic support variability or program depth.
~96% of 179 reviews are positive, highlighting good quality education, approachable professors, and improving courses. A small fraction of feedback mentions issues with program value and student support.
With a ~100% positive sentiment and an average rating of 4.3/5, students praise the multicultural environment, strong academic programs with practical applications, and supportive faculty. They also highlight engaging extracurriculars and a positive campus experience.
Nothing to show
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students praise the learning experience and highly recommend the university.
Two out of three reviews are positive, highlighting hands-on learning and practical lecturers. One negative review mentions outdated systems and unreliable lectures. The average rating is 3/5.
A perfect synergy between theoretical knowledge, practical application, and high-quality networking. After completing the Master in Sport Management at Johan Cruyff Institute, I took a major step forward in my career in the sports industry. What truly sets this institution apart is the closeness and support of the professors and staff, as well as the enriching experiences shared with fellow students. Without a doubt, it has been one of the most transformative decisions of my life.
The costs for EU students are ok. Housing is still crazy and you are lucky if you get assistance with that, but when you do, it's very good for the money. The classes are a bit big but we manage. I feel the curriculum is complete and up to date and theres nothing missing from my education
As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I’ve been studying at AMSIB for 3 years now. Almost 2 years were online studying due to COVID so I will share my experience considering most of the study up till now was online. I did start this year going to campus again. The program overall is pretty general. That makes the program pretty attractive to anybody because you can go to so many different fields after graduating. There is a possibility to do a major and to specialise in a field you like. However, the selection is pretty small (only 6 different majors) so that could be a point for improvement. The building of the school is located pretty far from the city centre and is placed next to a shopping area. As a result, there is not a lot to do around so most students just go home after. It’s a shame cause socialising is very important for us students. The school itself does not initiate a lot of social activities/ events which I think is a shame as well. The quality of the classes and the range of courses are pretty good. Some courses I would have to preferred to skip but most courses are a good pick. I really feel after 3 years that I gained so much knowledge about the business world and everything around it. The communication between students and teachers should be better. The communication goes through email and is very slow. Teachers should be more involved in my opinion. Diversity and inclusivity are also pretty impressive. However, the students should be more spread out between classes cause many classes are mostly Dutch students which counteracts the whole international environment idea. To finish, I would recommend the program as students gain enough knowledge by the time they want to choose a major which makes more students pursue their desired career path. I feel the school is working a lot on improving itself and its courses so I think it’s on the right path.
